Cargando…
Judicial deliberations : a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy /
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Oxford ; New York :
Oxford University Press,
2009.
|
| Colección: | Oxford studies in European law.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Title Page; Copyright Page; Preface to the Paperback Edition; General Editors' Preface; Dedication; Acknowledgements; Contents; Epigraphs; 1. Introduction; PART I The Three Courts-Raw Analysis; 2. The French Bifurcation; 3. The American Unification; 4. The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited; PART II Bifurcation; 5. Similarity and Difference; 6. France: How is the Discursive Bifurcation Maintained?; 7. The ECJ: The French Bifurcation Reworked; PART III Comparison; 8. The Sliding Scales; 9. Apples and Oranges; 10. On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability.
- 11. On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy12. Concluding Postscript; Bibliography; Index; Notes.