Cargando…
Proximization : the pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing /
This book proposes a new theory ("proximization theory") in the area of political/public legitimization discourse. Located at the intersection of Pragmatics, Cognitive Linguistics and critical approaches, the theory holds that legitimization of broadly consequential political/public polici...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam :
John Benjamins Pub. Company,
2013.
|
| Colección: | Pragmatics & beyond ;
new ser. v. 232. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Proximization; Editorial page ; Title page ; LCC data ; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Project overview; 1.2 A brief history of proximization ; 1.3 Direct goals; 1.4 Theoretical environment and theoretical implications as indirect goals; 1.5 Chapter overview; 2. Proximization as a (linguistic) concept; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Paul Chilton: From "representational proximising" in "geopolitical spaces" to Deictic Space Theo; 2.2.1 The 2004 approach: 3-d positioning and representations of the Kosovo war; 2.2.2 Discourse Space Theory or Deictic Space Theory?
- 2.3 Piotr Cap: Proximization for legitimization in search of quantifiable evidence; 2.3.1 The conceptual and "qualitative" stage; 2.3.2 The "qualitative-quantitative" stage; 2.4 Christopher Hart: Proximization and/within coercion, predication, metaphor; 2.5 Patricia Dunmire: Proximization across political genres; 2.6 Other approaches; 2.7 Approaches to proximization versus traditional accounts of deixis and perspective; 2.8 Summary; 3. Proximization and legitimization; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Legitimization: A multi-level phenomenon.
- 3.2.1 Perspectives from cognitive science, socio-political theory and social psychology3.2.2 Perspectives from linguistic pragmatics, text linguistics and critical discourse studies; 3.3 Legitimization through proximization, proximization for legitimization; 3.3.1 A sample analysis; 3.3.2 Maintaining the (AEI) legitimization: Changes in proximization strategies; 3.3.3 Interventionist discourses; 3.4 Beyond the war-on-terror; 4. Conceptual structure of the (S)patial-(T)emporal-(A)xiological model of proximization ; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Spatial proximization.
- 4.2.1 Threat construal through the ODC characterization4.2.2 Threat construal through the ODC impact speed; 4.2.3 Threat construal through the ODC impact consequences; 4.3 Temporal proximization; 4.3.1 "A September morning"; 4.3.2 Towards more quantifiable markers; 4.4 Axiological proximization; 4.4.1 Axiological proximization with high and explicit impact probability; 4.4.2 Axiological proximization with low(er) and implicit impact probability; 4.5 Conclusions; 5. The STA model and the 2001-2010 decade of the anti-terrorist discourse: Methodology and data; 5.1 Introduction.
- 5.2 Three frameworks of proximization5.2.1 The spatial proximization framework; 5.2.1.1 Category assignment of spatial proximization items; 5.2.2 The temporal proximization framework; 5.2.2.1 Category assignment of temporal proximization items; 5.2.3 The axiological proximization framework; 5.2.3.1 Category assignment of axiological proximization items; 5.3 The corpus and the sub-corpora; 5.4 Counts from the proximization frameworks; 5.4.1 Counts from the spatial framework; 5.4.2 Counts from the temporal framework; 5.4.3 Counts from the axiological framework; 5.5 Conclusion.