Evidence in international criminal trials : confronting legal gaps and the reconstruction of disputed events /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

In Evidence in International Criminal Trials Mark Klamberg compares procedural activities relevant for international criminal tribunals and the International Criminal Court, including evaluation, collection, disclosure, admissibility and presentation of evidence. The author analyses what objectives...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Klamberg, Mark
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Leiden : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013.
Colección:International criminal law series.
Temas:
International Criminal Court.
International Criminal Court
Evidence, Criminal (International law)
Criminal procedure (International law)
Preuve (Droit pénal international)
Procédure pénale (Droit international)
LAW > Criminal Law > General.
International criminal courts and tribunals.
Evidence.
International criminal procedure.
Bevis (juridik)
Internationell straffrätt.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Machine generated contents note: 1.1. Aim
  • 1.2. Structure of Analysis
  • 1.3. Definitions
  • 1.4. Legal Theory and Methodology
  • 1.4.1. Theory of Interests
  • 1.4.2. Identifying and Making Objectives Operational
  • 1.4.3. Interpretation
  • 1.4.4. Applicable Law
  • 1.4.4.1. General Principles of Law
  • 1.4.4.2. The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent
  • 1.4.4.3. Human Rights Law
  • 1.4.5. The Hybrid Nature of International Criminal Procedure
  • 1.5. Inventory of Objectives Pressing for Recognition in International Criminal Procedure
  • 1.5.1. Crime Control
  • 1.5.2. Fair Trial
  • 1.5.3. Expeditious Proceedings
  • 1.5.4. Truth
  • 1.5.5. Victims' Participation and Protection
  • 1.5.6. State Sovereignty
  • 2.1. Statutory Framework
  • 2.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 2.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 2.1.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 2.1.4. Implied and Inherent Powers
  • 2.2. Actors in the Proceedings
  • 2.2.1. The Historical Tribunals 8i
  • 2.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 2.2.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 2.3. Procedural Stages
  • 2.3.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 2.3.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 2.3.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 2.4. Conclusions
  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.1.1. Facts in Issue and Evidentiary Facts
  • 3.1.2. Regulated or Free Adjudication of Evidence
  • 3.1.3. Crime Base Evidence and Linkage Evidence
  • 3.2. Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Proof
  • 3.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 3.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 3.2.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 3.3. Standard of Proof
  • 3.3.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 3.3.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and, the Internationalized Courts
  • 3.3.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 3.4. The Relationship between Evaluation of Evidence and Collection of Evidence
  • 3.4.1. Acquittal through a Summary Judgment
  • 3.4.2. Authority to Order the Parties to Submit Additional Evidence
  • 3.4.3. Robustness and the Standard of an Adequate Investigation
  • 3.5. The Process of Fact-Finding
  • 3.5.1. The Absence of Formal Rules
  • 3.5.2. In Search of a Method of Evaluating Evidence
  • 3.5.3. How to Approach Probability
  • 3.5.3.1. Pascalian Approach to Probability and Bayes' Theorem
  • 3.5.3.2. Baconian Approach to Probability
  • 3.5.3.3. Narrative Evidence Theory
  • 3.5.4. Analytical Steps to Be Taken in a Systematic Evaluation of Evidence
  • 3.5.4.1. What Elements and Facts in Issue Need to Be Established?
  • 3.5.4.2. Structuring the Evidence
  • 3.5.4.3. Determining Probative Value and Weight
  • 3.5.4.3.1. The Difference between Reliability and Credibility
  • 3.5.4.3.2. The Probative Value and Weight of Each Fact in Issue
  • 3.5.4.3.3. Corroboration
  • 3.5.4.4. Does the Probative Value and Weight of the Evidence Meet the Standard of Evidence?
  • 3.5.4.6. Testing Alternative Hypotheses in International Criminal Proceedings
  • 3.5.4.5.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 3.5.4.5.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 3.5.4.5.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 3.6. Conclusions
  • 3.6.1. General Principles of Law
  • 3.6.2. Objectives Relevant for Determining the Burden of Proof and Standard of Proof
  • 3.6.3. Relationship between Adversarial and Inquisitorial Influences
  • 3.6.4. How to Facilitate Systematic Evaluation of Evidence
  • 4.1. Duties and Powers of the Parties
  • 4.1.1. The Prosecutor
  • 4.1.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.1.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.1.1.3. The ICC
  • 4.1.2. The Defence
  • 4.1.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.1.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.1.2.3. The ICC
  • 4.1.3. Victims
  • 4.2. Judicial Intervention
  • 4.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.2.3. The ICC
  • 4.3. State Cooperation
  • 4.3.1. The Duty of States to Co-Operate
  • 4.3.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.1.3. The ICC
  • 4.3.2. Binding Orders to a State
  • 4.3.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.2.3. The ICC
  • 4.3.3. Binding Orders to Individuals
  • 4.3.3.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.3.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.3.3. The ICC
  • 4.3.4. Binding Orders to Other Entities
  • 4.3.4.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.4.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.4.3. The ICC
  • 4.3.5. On-Site Investigations
  • 4.3.5.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.5.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.5.3. The ICC
  • 4.3.6. National Security Privilege
  • 4.3.6.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.6.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.6.3. The ICC
  • 4.3.7. The Consequences of Non-Compliance
  • 4.3.7.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 4.3.7.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 4.3.7.3. The ICC
  • 4.4. Conclusions
  • 4.4.1. General Principles of Law
  • 4.4.2. Objectives Relevant to the Collection of Evidence
  • 4.4.3. Relationship between Adversarial and Inquisitorial Influences
  • 4.4.4. How Collection of Evidence May Facilitate the Systematic Evaluation of Evidence
  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.1.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.2. Disclosure by the Prosecutor
  • 5.2.1. Statements of the Accused and Prosecution Witnesses
  • 5.2.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.2.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.2.1.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.2.2. Inspection
  • 5.2.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.2.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.2.2.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.2.3. Exculpatory Evidence
  • 5.2.3.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.2.3.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.2.3.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.3. Disclosure by the Defence
  • 5.3.1. Statements, Witnesses, Defence of Alibi and Special Defences
  • 5.3.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.3.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.3.1.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.3.2. Inspection
  • 5.3.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.3.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.3.2.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.4. Confidential Material and Restrictions on Disclosure
  • 5.4.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.4.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.4.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.5. Disclosure Inter Partes and Communication of Evidence to the Chamber
  • 5.5.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 5.5.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 5.5.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 5.6. Disclosure Obligations and Rights of Victims
  • 5.7. Conclusions
  • 5.7.1. General Principles of Law
  • 5.7.2. Objectives Relevant to Disclosure
  • 5.7.3. Relationship between Adversarial and Inquisitorial Influences
  • 5.7.4. How Disclosure May Facilitate the Systematic Evaluation of Evidence
  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.1.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.2. The Best Evidence Rule and the Principle of Immediacy
  • 6.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals, the Internationalized Courts and the International Criminal Court
  • 6.3. Relevance and Probative Value
  • 6.3.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.3.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.3.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.4. Reliability
  • 6.4.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.4.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.4.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.5. The Right to Challenge the Admissibility and Relevance of Evidence
  • 6.5.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.5.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.5.3. The International Criminal.
  • Court
  • 6.6. Admissibility and Evaluation of Certain Categories of Evidence
  • 6.6.1. The Principle of Orality
  • 6.6.1.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.1.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.1.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.2. Hearsay Evidence
  • 6.6.2.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.2.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.2.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.3. Documentary Evidence
  • 6.6.3.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.3.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.3.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.3.4. Depositions
  • 6.6.3.4.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.3.4.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.3.4.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.3.5. Affidavits
  • 6.6.3.5.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.3.5.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.3.5.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.3.6. Transcripts from Related Trials
  • 6.6.3.6.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.3.6.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.3.6.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.3.7. Statements of Deceased Witnesses
  • 6.6.3.7.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.3.7.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.3.7.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.4. Summary Evidence
  • 6.6.4.1. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.4.2. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.5. Illegally or Improperly Obtained Evidence
  • 6.6.5.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.5.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.5.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.6. Evidence in Cases of Sexual Assault
  • 6.6.6.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.6.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts
  • 6.6.6.3. The International Criminal Court
  • 6.6.7. Circumstantial Evidence
  • 6.6.7.1. The Historical Tribunals
  • 6.6.7.2. The ad hoc Tribunals and the Internationalized Courts.

Ejemplares similares