Cargando…

Bioethics, medicine, and the criminal law : the criminal law and bioethical conflict : walking the tightrope /

"Who should define what constitutes ethical and lawful medical practice? Judges? Doctors? Scientists? Or someone else entirely? This volume analyses how effectively criminal law operates as a forum for resolving ethical conflict in the delivery of health care. It addresses key questions such as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Alghrani, Amel (Editor ), Bennett, Rebecca, 1969- (Editor ), Ost, Suzanne (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge [UK] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Colección:Cambridge bioethics and law.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • Bioethics, Medicine and the Criminal Law Volume 1
  • Cambridge Bioethics and Law
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Contents
  • Contributors
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • 1 Introduction: When criminal law encounters bioethics: a case of tensions and incompatibilities or an apt forum for resolving ethical conflict?
  • Part I: Death, dying and the criminal law
  • Part II: Freedom and autonomy: when consent is not enough
  • Part III: Criminalising biomedical science
  • Part IV: Bioethics and criminal law in the dock
  • Themes and connections
  • Part I: Death, dying and the criminal law
  • 2 Euthanasia and assisted suicide should, when properly performed by a doctor in an appropriate case, be decriminalised
  • Introduction
  • The medical context
  • 'Decriminalisation´ and `legalisation´
  • Three scenarios of dying and their dangers
  • Scenario 1
  • Scenario 2
  • Scenario 3
  • The argument for decriminalisation
  • The argument for legalisation of euthanasia
  • The limitation to 'an appropriate case'
  • Conclusions
  • 3 Five flawed arguments for decriminalising euthanasia
  • Introduction
  • Hypocrisy of the criminal law
  • Autonomy, VAE and NVAE
  • The failure of the criminal law
  • Lessons from Dutch criminal law and medical practice
  • VAE for the `non-vulnerable´
  • Conclusions
  • 4 Euthanasia excused: between prohibition and permission
  • Introduction
  • Euthanasia: permitted or prohibited?
  • In that case
  • To prohibit or permit?
  • Euthanasia: excused
  • Why (not) compromise?
  • When to compromise
  • How to compromise
  • How to compromise on euthanasia
  • Conclusion
  • Part II: Freedom and autonomy: when consent is not enough
  • 5 Body Integrity Identity Disorder: a problem of perception?
  • Introduction
  • What is BIID?
  • Features of BIID (amputee form)
  • Aetiology.
  • Is it ever ethically and legally acceptable to amputate the healthy limb of someone with BIID?
  • The duty not to harm and the principle of respect for individual autonomy
  • Consent
  • Justice
  • Legal issues
  • The future
  • Conclusions
  • 6 Risky sex and `manly diversionsþ: contours of consent in HIV transmission and rough horseplay cases
  • Introduction
  • Ascertaining a victimþs consent: when is it presumptuous to presume?
  • Consent to grievous bodily harm inflicted through 'rough and undisciplined horseplay'
  • Consent in cases of reckless transmission of HIV through sexual intercourse
  • Three types of risky behaviour, three legal regimes: horseplay, HIV and 'vigorous' sex
  • Consent, gender and precedent: a historical view
  • Conclusion
  • 7 'Consensual' sexual activity between doctors and patients: a matter for the criminal law?
  • Introduction
  • Breaching sexual boundaries in the doctor-patient relationship
  • Can sexual activity between doctor and patient ever be truly consensual?
  • Sexual exploitation in the doctor-patient relationship and the limits of the criminal law
  • Conclusion
  • Part III: Criminalising biomedical science
  • 8 'Scientists in the dock': regulating science
  • Introduction
  • Regulating science: how and by whom?
  • Scientific responsibility: moral code, code of conduct?
  • Self-regulation: is it sufficient?
  • How does the law currently regulate science?
  • Research involving reproductive biomaterials
  • Criminal sanctions and the HFE Act
  • Research involving human tissue and organs
  • Criminal sanctions in the Human Tissue Act 2004
  • Is criminal law appropriate?
  • Criminal law as moral dictum
  • Hindering scientific progress
  • Discouraging research
  • Legal regulation and scientific freedom
  • Conclusions: moral controversy and criminal law
  • a symbolic role?
  • 9 Bioethical conflict and developing biotechnologies: is protecting individual and public health from the risks of xenotransplantation a matter for the (criminal) law?
  • Introduction
  • An overview of the risks
  • Xeno-surveillance
  • Compliance
  • Securing compliance
  • Civil law
  • contract
  • Criminal law
  • Conclusion: a new xenotransplantation statute
  • 10 The criminal law and enhancement: none of the law´s business?
  • Introduction
  • The drugs
  • The law
  • Regulatory reform and strategy
  • Access
  • Monitoring
  • Conclusion
  • 11 Dignity as a socially constructed value
  • Introduction
  • Foundations for human dignity
  • Dignity as a socially constructed value
  • Conclusion
  • Part IV: Bioethics and criminal law in the dock
  • 12 Can English law accommodate moral controversy in medicine? Lessons from abortion
  • Introduction
  • The role of the criminal law
  • Abortion: a muddled history
  • Science and certainty
  • The private domain?
  • Inconclusive conclusions
  • 13 The case for decriminalising abortion in Northern Ireland
  • Introduction
  • The consequences of criminalisation: abortion in Northern Ireland
  • Can law offer solutions?
  • What now?
  • Framing arguments for decriminalisation
  • Conclusion
  • 14: The impact of the loss of deference towards the medical profession
  • Introduction
  • The existence of deference in the civil courts
  • Deference in the criminal sphere
  • More recent cases in the criminal sphere
  • The loss of deference
  • Conclusion: the Human Tissue Act 2004
  • a blueprint for the future?
  • 15 Criminalising medical negligence
  • Introduction
  • 'Bad doctors'
  • A note on criminalisation
  • A note on gross negligence
  • Bolam and special treatment
  • Why are doctors different?
  • Level of blameworthiness
  • Fairness and liability
  • Conclusion
  • 16 All to the good? Criminality, politics, and public health.
  • Introduction
  • Public health: politics in a field without boundaries
  • Public health policy and criminal regulation
  • Public health, social responsibility, and health as the highest law
  • Conclusions
  • 17 Moral controversy, human rights and the common law judge
  • Index.