Cargando…
Space in Tense : the interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality and speech acts in Korean.
This monograph explores the tense, aspect, mood, and evidentiality of Korean, which has a rich verbal inflectional system, and proposes novel treatments within the framework of compositional semantics. One of the major contributions is the demonstration that Korean has two types of deictic tense--si...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam/Philadelphia :
John Benjamins Publishing Company,
2012.
|
| Colección: | Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Space in Tense; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of contents; Acknowledgments; List of Tables; List of Figures; Abbreviations; Introduction; 1.1 Goals of the investigation; 1.2 Theoretical assumptions concerning tense, aspect, and eventuality; 1.2.1 Tense as deixis; 1.2.2 The referential theory of tense; 1.2.3 Reference time; 1.2.4 Eventualities and the event argument; 1.2.5 Aspect as operators; 1.2.6 Perfect as an operator tense denoting anteriority; 1.3 Predicative suffixes in Korean; 1.4 Organization of the book; Deictic and non-deictic tenses in korean.
- 2.1 The simple form -ess2.1.1 Previous analyses; 2.1.1.1 Perfective analyses; 2.1.1.2 Past tense approaches; 2.1.1.3 Ambiguous between past and perfect; 2.1.2 Ess as an anterior (perfect); 2.2 The Double Form -Essess; 2.2.1 Previous analyses; 2.2.1.1 Pluperfect approaches; 2.2.1.2 Past tense plus experiential-contrastive aspect; 2.2.1.3 Discontinuous past tense; 2.2.2 Essess as a past tense; 2.3 The semantics of -essess versus -ess: deictic versus non-deictic; 2.4 Conclusion; Semantics and pragmatics of the perfect (anterior); 3.1 Semantics of the perfect.
- 3.1.1 Different readings of the perfect3.1.2 The relation between the semantics of the perfect and the present; 3.2 Pragmatics of the perfect; 3.2.1 The perfect, discourse topic, and current relevance; 3.2.2 Current relevance and the presupposition of the perfect; 3.3 The present perfect puzzle; 3.3.1 Rethinking the P-Definiteness Constraint; 3.3.2 Another puzzle: Exceptions to the Deictic T-Adverbial Constraint; 3.4 Conclusion; Spatial deictic tense; 4.1 The suffix -te; 4.1.1 Past imperfective approaches; 4.1.2 Evidential approaches; 4.1.2.1 Constraints on '-te'
- 4.1.2.2 The suffix '-te' is not an evidential marker4.1.3 -Te as a spatial deictic tense; 4.1.3.1 Faller's (2004) speaker's perceptual field and spatio-temporal deictic tense; 4.1.3.2 The speaker of '-te' is a passive perceiver; 4.1.3.3 '-Te' is the spatial deictic past tense; 4.2 -Ney as the spatial deictic present tense; 4.3 Conclusion; Evidentials in Korean; 5.1 Evidential typology; 5.2 True evidentiality and quasi-evidentiality; 5.3 The spatial deictic tense and evidentials; 5.3.1 Evidentials: -ess, -keyss, and -Ø; 5.3.1.1 Defining the evidential meanings.
- 5.3.1.2 Implementing the evidential meanings5.3.1.3 Presupposition of the evidential; 5.3.2 Modal meanings of the inferential indirect evidentials; 5.3.2.1 Indirect evidentials and epistemic modality; 5.3.2.2 Izvorski's analysis of the indirect evidential; 5.3.2.3 Semantics of the indirect evidential; 5.3.3 Modality in the definition of evidentials; 5.4 Reportative evidentials; 5.4.1 Reportative forms: -tanta ( -tay) and -tatela ( -tatey); 5.4.1.1 N.-K. Kim's (2000) analysis; 5.4.1.2 Hearsay vs. Second-hand; 5.4.2 Reportative versus non-reportative evidentials.