Oral argument and amicus curiae /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

"Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub., 2012.
Colección:Law and society (New York, N.Y.)
Temas:
United States. > Supreme Court > Decision making.
États-Unis. > Supreme Court > Prise de décision.
United States. > Supreme Court
Amici curiae > United States.
Forensic orations > United States.
Political questions and judicial power > United States.
Public interest law > United States.
Débats judiciaires > États-Unis.
Politique et pouvoir judiciaire > États-Unis.
LAW > Government > Federal.
Amici curiae
Decision making
Forensic orations
Political questions and judicial power
Public interest law
United States
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Listening to friends
  • Amici : who and when
  • Influence on case outcomes
  • Conclusions and implications.

Ejemplares similares