Cargando…
Informal fallacies : towards a theory of argument criticisms /
The basic question of this monograph is: how should we go about judging arguments to be reasonable or unreasonable? Our concern will be with argument in a broad sense, with realistic arguments in natural language. The basic object will be to engage in a normative study of determining what factors, s...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam ; Philadelphia :
J. Benjamins Pub. Co.,
1987.
|
| Colección: | Pragmatics & beyond companion series ;
4. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EBSCO_ocn773755523 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231017213018.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 120124s1987 ne ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | |z 86027055 | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d OCLCE |d E7B |d OCLCQ |d OCLCF |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d AZK |d LOA |d OCLCO |d TOA |d OCLCO |d COCUF |d MOR |d PIFAG |d COO |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d OCLCA |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d AGLDB |d VT2 |d OCLCQ |d WYU |d CEF |d UX1 |d HS0 |d UWK |d ADU |d BOL |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d CNNOR |d REDDC |d M8D |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO | ||
| 019 | |a 571004110 |a 608927853 |a 935680162 |a 961688698 |a 962722645 |a 966233555 |a 974193096 |a 987449666 |a 987451796 |a 987452371 |a 987646302 |a 987672722 |a 988497948 |a 992038631 |a 1000442777 |a 1017999847 |a 1037794704 |a 1038679248 |a 1043662982 |a 1066418126 |a 1081216189 |a 1100829400 |a 1101715365 |a 1109308961 |a 1110408949 |a 1112891207 |a 1114342666 |a 1119009411 |a 1119107279 |a 1137104425 |a 1162395161 |a 1178538303 |a 1228603681 |a 1241757650 |a 1247716778 |a 1257351021 |a 1257380110 |a 1259086974 |a 1290109263 |a 1295332895 |a 1295376129 |a 1300639579 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789027278906 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9027278903 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1283358905 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781283358903 | ||
| 020 | |a 9786613358905 | ||
| 020 | |a 6613358908 | ||
| 020 | |z 1556190107 |q (U.S. ; |q alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781556190100 |q (U.S. ; |q alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 9027250057 | ||
| 020 | |z 9789027250056 | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000051597557 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBBG |b BV043070774 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBSZ |b 421488670 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a GBVCP |b 803863454 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a NZ1 |b 15332800 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)773755523 |z (OCoLC)571004110 |z (OCoLC)608927853 |z (OCoLC)935680162 |z (OCoLC)961688698 |z (OCoLC)962722645 |z (OCoLC)966233555 |z (OCoLC)974193096 |z (OCoLC)987449666 |z (OCoLC)987451796 |z (OCoLC)987452371 |z (OCoLC)987646302 |z (OCoLC)987672722 |z (OCoLC)988497948 |z (OCoLC)992038631 |z (OCoLC)1000442777 |z (OCoLC)1017999847 |z (OCoLC)1037794704 |z (OCoLC)1038679248 |z (OCoLC)1043662982 |z (OCoLC)1066418126 |z (OCoLC)1081216189 |z (OCoLC)1100829400 |z (OCoLC)1101715365 |z (OCoLC)1109308961 |z (OCoLC)1110408949 |z (OCoLC)1112891207 |z (OCoLC)1114342666 |z (OCoLC)1119009411 |z (OCoLC)1119107279 |z (OCoLC)1137104425 |z (OCoLC)1162395161 |z (OCoLC)1178538303 |z (OCoLC)1228603681 |z (OCoLC)1241757650 |z (OCoLC)1247716778 |z (OCoLC)1257351021 |z (OCoLC)1257380110 |z (OCoLC)1259086974 |z (OCoLC)1290109263 |z (OCoLC)1295332895 |z (OCoLC)1295376129 |z (OCoLC)1300639579 | ||
| 037 | |n Title subscribed to via ProQuest Academic Complete | ||
| 042 | |a dlr | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a BC175 |b .W34 1987eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PHI |x 011000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 165 |2 22 |
| 084 | |a 08.33 |2 bcl | ||
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Walton, Douglas N. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Informal fallacies : |b towards a theory of argument criticisms / |c Douglas N. Walton. |
| 260 | |a Amsterdam ; |a Philadelphia : |b J. Benjamins Pub. Co., |c 1987. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 336 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 340 | |g polychrome. |2 rdacc |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003 | ||
| 347 | |a data file | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Pragmatics & beyond companion series ; |v 4 | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 323-330) and indexes. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 506 | |3 Use copy |f Restrictions unspecified |2 star |5 MiAaHDL | ||
| 533 | |a Electronic reproduction. |b [Place of publication not identified] : |c HathiTrust Digital Library, |d 2010. |5 MiAaHDL | ||
| 538 | |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. |u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212 |5 MiAaHDL | ||
| 583 | 1 | |a digitized |c 2010 |h HathiTrust Digital Library |l committed to preserve |2 pda |5 MiAaHDL | |
| 505 | 0 | |a INFORMAL FALLACIES Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Acknowledgements; Table of contents; CHAPTER 1: A NEW MODEL OF ARGUMENT; 1. Introduction to the Fallacies; 2. Some More Fallacies; 3. Fallacies Combined in Realistic Dialogues; 4. What is an Argument?; 5. Criticism as Challenge and Response; 6. Basic Categories of Argument Study; NOTES; CHAPTER TWO: HOT RHETORIC AND ARGUMENT; 1. Appeals to Popular Sentiment; 2. Appeals to Force; 3. Appeals to Pity; 4. Overly Personal Argumentation; 5. The Rhetorical Debate | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 6. Case Study: Parliamentary Debate1. THE ECONOMY MEASURES TO MAINTAIN EMPLOYMENT; 2. BANKS AND BANKING; 7. Conclusion; NOTES; CHAPTER 3: THE LOGIC OF PROPOSITIONS; 1. Deductive Validity; 2. Formal Logic; 3. Classical Propositional Calculus; 4. Applying Deductive Logic to Arguments; 5. Invalidity and Fallaciousness; 6. Relevance and Validit; 7. Subject-Matter Relatedness; 8. Relatedness Logic; 9. Semantics and Pragmatics; 10. What is a Fallacy?; NOTES; CHAPTER 4: LOGICAL DIALOGUE-GAMES; 1. Different Approaches to Formal Dialogues; 2. The Ad Ignorantiam Fallacy; 3. Fallacies of Question-Asking | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4. The Fallacy of Many Questions5. Demanding Direct Answers to Questions; 6. Misconception of Refutation; 7. Case Studies of Political Debates; 8. A Game with Dark-Side Commitments; NOTES; CHAPTER 5: ENTHYMEMES; 1. The Tradition of Enthymemes; 2. The Objectives of Dialogue; 3. Veiled Commitment-Sets; 4. Strategy and Plausibility; 5. The Problem Resolved; 6. Order of the Premisses; 7. Multiple Premisses in Complex Arguments; NOTE; CHAPTER 6: LONGER SEQUENCES OF ARGUMENTATION; 1. Sequences of Argumentation; 2. Graphs of Arguments; 3. Case Study: Argument on Sex Education | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4. Case Study: Circular Argumentation5. Plausibility Conditions on Arguments; 6. The Missing Links; 7. Conclusions on Circular Arguments; NOTES; CHAPTER 7: FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FROM AUTHORITY; 1. How Appeals to Authority Can Go Wrong; 2. Plausible Argument; 3. Where Experts Disagree; 4. Expertise and Legal Dialogue; 5. Dialogue and Expertise; 6. Conclusions; NOTE; CHAPTER 8: VARIOUS FALLACIES; 1. Inductive Fallacies; 2. Deductive and Inductive Arguments; 3. Post Hoc Arguments; 4. Slippery Slope; 5. Equivocation; 6. Amphiboly; 7. Composition and Division | |
| 505 | 8 | |a CHAPTER 9: ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE PERSON1. Poisoning the Well; 2. The Sportsman's Rejoinder; 3. Evaluating Ad Hominem Disputations; 4. Four Types of Circumstantial Ad Hominem; 5. Rhetorical Context of Ad Hominem Attacks; 6. Positional Defensibility; 7. Conclusion; NOTES; CHAPTER 10: EQUIVOCATION; 1. What is Equivocation?; 2. Vagueness and Criticisms of Equivocality; 3. The Problem of Subtle Equivocations; 4. Deep Deception and Equivocal Dialogue; 5. Many-Valued Logic for Equivocators; 6. Priest's System LP; 7. Applying LP to the Fallacy of Equivocation; 8. R-Mingle as a Logic for Equivocators | |
| 520 | |a The basic question of this monograph is: how should we go about judging arguments to be reasonable or unreasonable? Our concern will be with argument in a broad sense, with realistic arguments in natural language. The basic object will be to engage in a normative study of determining what factors, standards, or procedures should be adopted or appealed to in evaluating an argument as "good," "not-so-good," "open to criticism," "fallacious," and so forth. Hence our primary concern will be with the problems of how to criticize an argument, and when a criticism is reasonably justified | ||
| 590 | |a eBooks on EBSCOhost |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Fallacies (Logic) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Logic. | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Logic | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sophismes. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Logique. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a logic. |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHILOSOPHY |x Logic. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fallacies (Logic) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Logic |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fehlschluss |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Argumentation |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rationalität |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Argument |2 gnd | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Walton, Douglas N. |t Informal fallacies. |d Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : J. Benjamins Pub. Co., 1987 |z 9781556190100 |w (OCoLC)608927853 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Pragmatics & beyond companion series ; |v 4. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=408326 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10515881 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 408326 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 7274143 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||