The Perception of Nonverbal Behavior in the Career Interview.

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Walburga von Raffler-Engel takes a novel approach to compiling information about doctor-patient communication. She has surveyed popular literature around the world to gain a grass-roots' perception of this relationship in various cultures. Most of the contributions are by practicing physicians,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Raffler-Engel, Walburga von
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1983.
Colección:Pragmatics & beyond ; 4:4.
Temas:
Employment interviewing.
Body language.
Kinesics
Entretiens d'embauche.
Langage du corps.
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS > Human Resources & Personnel Management.
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS > Workplace Culture.
Body language
Employment interviewing
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • THE PERCEPTION OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR IN THE CAREER INTERVIEW; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; PREFACE; 0. INTRODUCTION; 1. THE BUSINESS TRANSACTION; 2. THE CAREER INTERVIEW; 3. THE ACADEMIC INTERVIEW; 4. THE INTERACTIONAL ELEMENT; 4 1. Instrument; 4.2. Subjects; 4.3. Analysis; 4.4. Results; 4.4.1. Non-interactional behavior; 4.4.2. Interactional behavior; 4.5. Conclusion; 5. HIERARCHICAL EVALUATION OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIORS; Abbreviations; 6. INTERVIEWING THE INTERVIEWER; 6.1. Literature search; 6.2. Manifestation and interpretation; 6.3. Proxemics; 6.4. Conclusion.
  • 7. THE SIMILAR-TO-ME EFFECT8. THE STRUCTURE OF THE CAREER INTERVIEW; 8.1. The structure of the interview; 8.2. Dominance; 8.3. Psychological tests; 8.4. Conclusion; 9. THE RELATIONSHIP OF NONVERBAL FEATURES TO VERBAL FEATURES IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS; 9.1. Research design; 9.2. Instrument; 9.3. Testing procedure; 9.4. Subjects; 9.5. Analysis; 9.6. Results; 9.7. Conclusions; 10. DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEPTION OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR AMONG STUDENTS AND NON-STUDENTS AND DEPENDING ON THE SEX AND THE AGE OF THE RAT; 10.1. Instrument; 10.2. Testing procedure; 10.3. Subjects; 10.4. Analysis.
  • 10.5. Results10.5.1. Age differences among interviewers; 10.5.2. Professionals versus students (see Chart I at end of chapter); 10.5.3. Comparison by sex
  • Professionals (See Chart II at end of chapter); 10.4.5. Comparison by sex
  • Students (See Chart III at end of chapter); 10.5.5. Comparison by sex
  • All males versus all females (See Charts IV, V, and VI at end of chapter); 10.6. Conclusion; 11. DIFFERENCES IN THE EVALUATION OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR DEPENDING ON THE SEX OF THE SENDER; 11.1. The rating of a female vs. a male candidate; 11.1.1. Instrument; 11.1.2. Subjects and testing procedure.
  • 11.1.3. Results: Rating of female vs. male candidate11.1.4. Conclusion: Rating of female vs. male candidate; 11.2. The evaluation of the female candidate depending on the sex of the rater; 12. THE MINORITY APPLICANT; 12.1. Employers' attitudes; 12.2. How the minority candidate perceives himself; 13. THE USE OF NONVERBAL CUES IN DETERMINING SKILL QUALIFICATIONS; CONCLUSION; APPEND I. XIPersonal Data; APPENDIX II. Performance Ratings; REFERENCES.

Ejemplares similares