Cargando…

From a topical point of view : dialectic in Anselm of Canterbury's De Grammatico /

This study of Anselm of Canterbury's enigmatic work "De grammatico" provides a perspective both on Anselm's thought and the history of medieval dialectic immediately prior to the renaissance of dialectic in the 12th century. The first part of the book examines Anselm's notio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Boschung, Peter
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2006.
Colección:Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters ; Bd. 90.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • Contents
  • PREFACE
  • Chapter One ON INTERPRETING ANSELM8217;S DE GRAMMATICO
  • 1.1. Introduction
  • 1.2. The influence of De grammatico on medieval logic
  • 1.2.2. Fallacies and revisiting the theory of supposition
  • 1.3. Reinterpreting De grammatico
  • 1.4. The structure of De grammatico
  • 1.4.1. De grammatico as a proto-quaestio
  • 1.4.2. The structure of De grammatico
  • Chapter Two DIALECTIC
  • 2.1. Anselm8217;s background
  • 2.1.1. Introduction
  • 2.1.2. Anselm8217;s sources
  • 2.1.3. Weighing the sources
  • 2.2. ICT on the art of careful reasoning
  • 2.2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2.2. The two divisions of dialectic
  • 2.2.3. The basic notions
  • 2.3. Dialectic in De grammatico
  • 2.3.1. The basic terminology
  • 2.3.2. Some clarifications
  • 2.3.3. The distinction between the argument and the argumentation
  • 2.4. Conclusion
  • Chapter Three FALLACIES IN DE GRAMMATICO
  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. Anselm8217;s sources
  • 3.2.1. Sources for early medieval theory of fallacies
  • 3.2.2. De grammatico and the fallacy secundum accidens
  • 3.2.3. A fallacy 8216;secundum denominationem8217;?
  • 3.3. Fallacies Part I: Introducing the Methodology
  • 3.3.1. Preliminaries
  • 3.3.2. The first set of arguments contra (1a)
  • 3.3.3. The second argument contra (1a)
  • 3.3.4. The third set of arguments contra (1a)
  • 3.3.5. Transition to part 2
  • 3.4. Fallacies Part II: Developing a theory
  • 3.4.1. Introduction
  • 3.4.2. Anselm8217;s theory in a nutshell
  • 3.4.3. The first alternative to the theory (Fallacy 10)
  • 3.4.4. Clarifying the theory
  • 3.4.5. Usus loquendi in the 12th century
  • 3.4.6. Adapting the theory
  • 3.4.7. The second alternative to the theory
  • 3.4.8. Conclusion
  • 3.5. The Verstehensregel
  • 3.5.1. Introduction
  • 3.5.2. Boethian Topic as a source for the Verstehensregel
  • 3.5.3. Argument and Argumentation in the 12th century
  • 3.5.4. Garland on argumentum and argumentatio
  • 3.5.5. Reinterpreting the Verstehensregel
  • Chapter Four RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FALLACIES IN DE GRAMMATICO
  • 4.1. Fallacies concerned with the first argument
  • 4.1.1. Fallacy 1 and 2
  • 4.1.2. Fallacy 3
  • 4.1.3. Fallacy 4:
  • 4.1.4. Fallacy 5
  • 4.1.5. Fallacy 6
  • 4.1.6. Fallacy 7
  • 4.2. Transition into the second part of De grammatico
  • 4.3. The student8217;s alternative theory (Fallacy 10)
  • 4.3.1. First refutation of 10
  • 4.3.2. Second refutation of 10
  • 4.3.3. Third refutation of 10
  • 4.3.4. Fourth refutation of 10
  • 4.3.5. Fifth refutation of 10
  • 4.3.6. Fallacy 11, 12 and 13
  • 4.3.7. Fallacy 14
  • 4.3.8. Fallacy 15
  • 4.3.9. Fallacy 16, 17, and 18
  • 4.4. Conclusion
  • Chapter Five SIGNIFICATION AND PREDICATION: ANSELM8217;S SOURCES
  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. The problem of paronyms and derived words
  • 5.2.1. Conclusion
  • 5.3. Augustine on Signification
  • 5.4. Boethius on Signification
  • 5.4.1. The commentary on the Categories
  • 5.4.2. The second commentary on De interpretatione
  • 5.4.3. Discourse and Signification
  • 5.4.4. Predication in DDT and ICT
  • 5.4.5. Predication in the Theological Treatises
  • 5.4.6. Conclusion
  • 5.5. Priscian on Signification and Paronymy
  • 5.5.1. Priscian vs. Aristotle?
  • 5.5.2. The participle and theories of paronymy
  • 5.5.3. Signification and the parts of spee.