Cargando…
Demystifying legal reasoning /
"Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authori...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge ; New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2008.
|
| Colección: | Cambridge introductions to philosophy and law.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Part I. Law and its Function
- Settling Moral controversy
- Part II. Common Law Reasoning: Deciding Cases When Prior Judicial Decisions Determine the Law
- Ordinary reason applied to law: natural reasoning and deduction from rules
- The mystification of common-law reasoning
- Common law practice
- Part III. Reasoning from Canonical Legal Texts
- Interpreting statutes and other posited rules
- Infelicities of the intended meaning of canonical texts and norms constraining interpretation
- Non-intentionalist interpretation
- Is constitutional interpretation different? Why it isn't and is
- All or nothing.