Cargando…
Judicial reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act /
A collection of essays examining the judicial decision-making process under the Human Rights Act 1998.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , , |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge, UK ; New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2007.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- 1. Judicial Reasoning and the Human Rights Act 1998 Helen Fenwick, Roger Masterman and Gavin Phillipson
- Part I. The Interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998: 2. The System of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act: The View from the Outside Colin Warbrick
- 3. Aspiration or Foundation? The Status of Strasbourg Jurisprudence and the 'Convention Rights' in Domestic Law Roger Masterman
- 4. Institutional Roles and Meanings of 'Compatibility' under the Human Rights Act 1998 David Feldman
- 5. Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v Mendoza Aileen Kavanagh
- 6. Clarity postponed? Horizontal Effect after Campbell and Re. S. Gavin Phillipson
- 7. The Standard of Judicial Review and Legal Reasoning after the Human Rights Act Ian Leigh
- 8. Principles of Deference under the Human Rights Act Sir David Keene
- Part II. The Human Rights Act and Substantive Law: 9. The Common Law, Privacy and the Convention Gavin Phillipson
- 10. Judicial Reasoning in Clashing Rights Cases Helen Fenwick
- 11. Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Restraint or Revolution? Sonia Harris-Short
- 12. Article 14: A Protector, Not a Prosecutor Aaron Baker
- 13. Criminal Procedure, The Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act Paul Roberts
- 14. Concluding remarks Ian Leigh.