Cargando…

Judicial reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act /

A collection of essays examining the judicial decision-making process under the Human Rights Act 1998.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, Masterman, Roger
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • 1. Judicial Reasoning and the Human Rights Act 1998 Helen Fenwick, Roger Masterman and Gavin Phillipson
  • Part I. The Interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998: 2. The System of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act: The View from the Outside Colin Warbrick
  • 3. Aspiration or Foundation? The Status of Strasbourg Jurisprudence and the 'Convention Rights' in Domestic Law Roger Masterman
  • 4. Institutional Roles and Meanings of 'Compatibility' under the Human Rights Act 1998 David Feldman
  • 5. Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v Mendoza Aileen Kavanagh
  • 6. Clarity postponed? Horizontal Effect after Campbell and Re. S. Gavin Phillipson
  • 7. The Standard of Judicial Review and Legal Reasoning after the Human Rights Act Ian Leigh
  • 8. Principles of Deference under the Human Rights Act Sir David Keene
  • Part II. The Human Rights Act and Substantive Law: 9. The Common Law, Privacy and the Convention Gavin Phillipson
  • 10. Judicial Reasoning in Clashing Rights Cases Helen Fenwick
  • 11. Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Restraint or Revolution? Sonia Harris-Short
  • 12. Article 14: A Protector, Not a Prosecutor Aaron Baker
  • 13. Criminal Procedure, The Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act Paul Roberts
  • 14. Concluding remarks Ian Leigh.