Cargando…
Why dominant parties lose : Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective /
Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties t...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2007.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EBSCO_ocn173845401 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231017213018.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 071009s2007 nyua ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d UX0 |d OCLCQ |d E7B |d AU@ |d IDEBK |d REDDC |d OCLCQ |d COCUF |d CCO |d COO |d ICG |d UAB |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d VT2 |d OCLCQ |d LVT |d WYU |d OCLCQ |d A6Q |d INARC |d UKAHL |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO | ||
| 019 | |a 191925192 |a 271785116 |a 647660634 |a 896186384 |a 1055407621 |a 1066622585 |a 1228546103 |a 1245900053 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511335532 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0511335539 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0511333676 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511333675 | ||
| 020 | |a 0511334958 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511334955 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9780521877190 |q (hardback) | ||
| 020 | |z 0521877199 |q (hardback) | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000042830273 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000051560261 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000062551717 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a NZ1 |b 15735020 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)173845401 |z (OCoLC)191925192 |z (OCoLC)271785116 |z (OCoLC)647660634 |z (OCoLC)896186384 |z (OCoLC)1055407621 |z (OCoLC)1066622585 |z (OCoLC)1228546103 |z (OCoLC)1245900053 | ||
| 043 | |a n-mx--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a JF2051 |b .G75 2007eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 015000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 324.2 |2 22 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Greene, Kenneth F., |d 1969- | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why dominant parties lose : |b Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / |c Kenneth F. Greene. |
| 260 | |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2007. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xvi, 350 pages) : |b illustrations | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 311-331) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications. | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 520 | |a Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy. | ||
| 590 | |a eBooks on EBSCOhost |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a One-party systems. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Opposition (Political science) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Democratization |z Mexico. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Presidents |z Mexico |x Election |y 2000. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Comparative government. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Parti unique. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Opposition (Science politique) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Démocratisation |z Mexique. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Political Process |x Political Parties. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Comparative government |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Democratization |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a One-party systems |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Opposition (Political science) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Presidents |x Election |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Mexico |2 fast | |
| 648 | 7 | |a 2000 |2 fast | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Greene, Kenneth F., 1969- |t Why dominant parties lose. |d New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007 |z 9780521877190 |z 0521877199 |w (DLC) 2007018740 |w (OCoLC)126227679 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=206844 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH13420866 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10193799 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 206844 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n 104059 | ||
| 938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n whydominantparti0000gree | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 2716220 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 2770220 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||