Cargando…

Electing justice : fixing the Supreme Court nomination process /

The nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices has, in recent years, become a battleground like no other. Bruising Senate confirmation hearings for failed nominee Robert Bork and successful nominee Clarence Thomas left the reputation of all branches of government in disarray and the parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Davis, Richard, 1955-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2005.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500
001 EBSCO_ocm77804667
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 070113s2005 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e pn  |c N$T  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCG  |d OCLCQ  |d MT4IT  |d E7B  |d OCLCQ  |d IDEBK  |d OCLCQ  |d NLGGC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d KIJ  |d OCLCQ  |d AGLDB  |d PIFAG  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d WY@  |d LUE  |d OCLCF  |d INARC  |d VTS  |d CEF  |d COCUF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d LHU  |d YOU  |d STF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d YDX  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 148810371  |a 252672092  |a 455977004  |a 646752649  |a 756883582  |a 776942338 
020 |a 9781429431033  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1429431032  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 0195181093  |q (Cloth) 
020 |z 9780195181098  |q (alk. paper) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000051577537 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043082509 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 422231509 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 14172660 
029 1 |a YDXCP  |b 2507207 
035 |a (OCoLC)77804667  |z (OCoLC)148810371  |z (OCoLC)252672092  |z (OCoLC)455977004  |z (OCoLC)646752649  |z (OCoLC)756883582  |z (OCoLC)776942338 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8742  |b .D383 2005eb 
055 1 3 |a KF8742  |b .D383 2005eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 039000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.73/2634  |2 22 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Davis, Richard,  |d 1955- 
245 1 0 |a Electing justice :  |b fixing the Supreme Court nomination process /  |c Richard Davis. 
260 |a Oxford ;  |a New York :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2005. 
300 |a 1 online resource (viii, 211 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Traditional versus new players -- The politics of judicial selection -- How the process broke : the transformation of the Supreme Court appointment process -- New roles for external players -- Today's nomination process : the battle over image -- Reforming the process. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a The nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices has, in recent years, become a battleground like no other. Bruising Senate confirmation hearings for failed nominee Robert Bork and successful nominee Clarence Thomas left the reputation of all branches of government in disarray and the participants - and the nation - exhausted. Even uncontroversial nominations such as those of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer have faced a protracted process. The Senate's constitutional prerogative to provide advice and consent to the president's nominations to the highest court in the land has given rise to political grandstanding and ideological battles. Less well known is how other players - interest groups, the news media, and, through their involvement, the general public - also affect the conduct and outcome of the Supreme Court nomination process. In Electing Justice, Richard Davis reveals how from the late 1960s on, the role of these other players grew in intensity to the point that the nomination process would be unrecognizable to its original devisers, the Framers of the Constitution. The path to the Supreme Court now includes live television coverage of Senate hearings, "murder boards" in preparation for those hearings, a flood of press releases, television and radio advertisements, and public opinion polls. Unlike earlier, more elite-governed processes, the involvement of outside groups has become highly public and their impact is now widely accepted. The general public too has become involved, as through the public campaigns waged by outside groups voters increasingly follow Supreme Court nominations and hold opinions about confirmation. How should we respond to this informal democratization of the selection process? The genie, Davis contends, cannot be put back into the bottle and we cannot return to a nonpolitical, elite-driven ideal. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |x Officials and employees  |x Selection and appointment. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court  |x Fonctionnaires  |x Sélection et nomination. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
610 1 7 |a USA  |b Supreme Court  |2 gnd 
610 2 7 |a USA; Supreme Court.  |2 idszbz 
650 0 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Juges  |x Sélection et nomination  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Government  |x Federal.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Judges  |x Selection and appointment  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Organisation  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Wahl  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Richter  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Richterwahl.  |2 idszbz 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Davis, Richard, 1955-  |t Electing justice.  |d Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2005  |z 0195181093  |w (DLC) 2004015898  |w (OCoLC)55960787 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=179942  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 20447382 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n electingjusticef0000davi 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10233596 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 179942 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n 84540 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n electingjusticef00davi 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2507207 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 7133301 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2856319 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP