Cargando…

Overruled? : legislative overrides, pluralism, and contemporary court-Congress relations /

Since the mid-1970s, Congress has passed hundreds of overrides--laws that explicitly seek to reverse or modify judicial interpretations of statutes. Whether front-page news or not, overrides serve potentially vital functions in American policy-making. Federal statutes--and court cases interpreting t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Barnes, Jeb
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 2004.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 EBSCO_ocm55848536
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu|||unuuu
008 040706s2004 caua ob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  2003023971 
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e pn  |c N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d TUU  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d REDDC  |d BAKER  |d DKDLA  |d OCLCE  |d E7B  |d ADU  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d NLGGC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d AZK  |d COCUF  |d MOR  |d CCO  |d PIFBR  |d OCLCQ  |d WY@  |d U3W  |d LUE  |d STF  |d WRM  |d VTS  |d NRAMU  |d INT  |d VT2  |d OCLCQ  |d REC  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d TKN  |d AGLDB  |d G3B  |d HS0  |d UWK  |d UKCRE  |d BOL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d VLY  |d MHW  |d SGP  |d OCLCQ  |d IOY  |d OCLCQ  |d INARC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 70724860  |a 149299993  |a 478274828  |a 607138003  |a 609175123  |a 614749927  |a 722257409  |a 961647207  |a 961695202  |a 962573435  |a 962684600  |a 975044205  |a 975212369  |a 988462077  |a 992106667  |a 992109844  |a 1017996873  |a 1037734121  |a 1038597358  |a 1043607329  |a 1045506005  |a 1053057946  |a 1055404831  |a 1065005561  |a 1109306362  |a 1110364116  |a 1114345533  |a 1119085610  |a 1119087824  |a 1153512752  |a 1162439508  |a 1162686018  |a 1182012986  |a 1193148226  |a 1228618659  |a 1392321472 
020 |a 1417519452  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781417519453  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0804748837  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |a 9780804748834  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |a 0804767203 
020 |a 9780804767200 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000066757545 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043063045 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 422381977 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 14234719 
035 |a (OCoLC)55848536  |z (OCoLC)70724860  |z (OCoLC)149299993  |z (OCoLC)478274828  |z (OCoLC)607138003  |z (OCoLC)609175123  |z (OCoLC)614749927  |z (OCoLC)722257409  |z (OCoLC)961647207  |z (OCoLC)961695202  |z (OCoLC)962573435  |z (OCoLC)962684600  |z (OCoLC)975044205  |z (OCoLC)975212369  |z (OCoLC)988462077  |z (OCoLC)992106667  |z (OCoLC)992109844  |z (OCoLC)1017996873  |z (OCoLC)1037734121  |z (OCoLC)1038597358  |z (OCoLC)1043607329  |z (OCoLC)1045506005  |z (OCoLC)1053057946  |z (OCoLC)1055404831  |z (OCoLC)1065005561  |z (OCoLC)1109306362  |z (OCoLC)1110364116  |z (OCoLC)1114345533  |z (OCoLC)1119085610  |z (OCoLC)1119087824  |z (OCoLC)1153512752  |z (OCoLC)1162439508  |z (OCoLC)1162686018  |z (OCoLC)1182012986  |z (OCoLC)1193148226  |z (OCoLC)1228618659  |z (OCoLC)1392321472 
042 |a dlr 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF425  |b .B37 2004eb 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040030  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 062000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 012000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.73/12  |2 22 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Barnes, Jeb. 
245 1 0 |a Overruled? :  |b legislative overrides, pluralism, and contemporary court-Congress relations /  |c Jeb Barnes. 
260 |a Stanford, Calif. :  |b Stanford University Press,  |c 2004. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xi, 219 pages) :  |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
340 |g polychrome.  |2 rdacc  |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003 
347 |a data file 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Background. The questions, debate, and overview ; Overrides in contemporary U.S. policy-making : promise and current understanding -- pt. I. Do overrides matter? assumptions and hypotheses ; Data, methods, and findings -- pt. II. What patterns of court-Congress relations underlie the override process? A typology of override scenarios -- Operationalization of typology, findings, and discussions -- Under what conditions ...? patterns and hypotheses -- Conclusion. Broader implications and avenues for future inquiry -- Appendix: summary of overrides analyzed. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
506 |3 Use copy  |f Restrictions unspecified  |2 star  |5 MiAaHDL 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b [Place of publication not identified] :  |c HathiTrust Digital Library,  |d 2010.  |5 MiAaHDL 
538 |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.  |u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212  |5 MiAaHDL 
583 1 |a digitized  |c 2010  |h HathiTrust Digital Library  |l committed to preserve  |2 pda  |5 MiAaHDL 
546 |a English. 
520 |a Since the mid-1970s, Congress has passed hundreds of overrides--laws that explicitly seek to reverse or modify judicial interpretations of statutes. Whether front-page news or not, overrides serve potentially vital functions in American policy-making. Federal statutes--and court cases interpreting them--often require revision. Some are ambiguous, some conflict, and others are obsolete. Under these circumstances, overrides promise Congress a means to repair flawed statutes, reconcile discordant court decisions, and reverse errant judicial interpretations. Overrides also allow dissatisfied litigants to revisit issues and raise concerns in Congress that courts have overlooked. Of course, promising is one thing and delivering is quite another. Accordingly, this book asks: Do overrides, in fact, effectively clarify the law, reverse objectionable judicial statutory interpretations, and broaden deliberation on contested issues? The answers provide new insights into the complex role of overrides in U.S. policy-making and in the politics of contemporary court-Congress relations. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Statutes  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial review  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Interpretation and construction. 
650 0 |a Political questions and judicial power  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Statuts  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Droit  |z États-Unis  |x Interprétation. 
650 6 |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Legal Services.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Civil Procedure.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Judicial review  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Law  |x Interpretation and construction  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Political questions and judicial power  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Statutes  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Barnes, Jeb.  |t Overruled?.  |d Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 2004  |z 0804748837  |w (DLC) 2003023971  |w (OCoLC)53369347 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=110076  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Baker & Taylor  |b BKTY  |c 52.00  |d 52.00  |i 0804748837  |n 0004362470  |s active 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10056569 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 110076 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2349501 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 3319740 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n overruledlegisla0000barn 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP