Cargando…

The Cambridge controversies in capital theory : a study in the logic of theory development /

"A controversy in capital theory dominated economics in the 1960s and 1970s. Economists based in Cambridge, England detected flaws in the production model of neoclassical economics, associated with Cambridge, America. This debate established that the aggregate measure K for capital could not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Birner, Jack, 1951-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: London ; New York : Routledge, 2002.
Colección:Routledge studies in the history of economics ; 47.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 EBSCO_ocm50679332
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 020926s2002 enka ob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  00047059  
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e pn  |c N$T  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCG  |d OCLCQ  |d TUU  |d OCLCQ  |d TNF  |d BTCTA  |d VVN  |d NIALS  |d CUSER  |d E7B  |d MERUC  |d FVL  |d TULIB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d N$T  |d OCLCF  |d CRCPR  |d OCLCQ  |d TYFRS  |d OCLCQ  |d SUR  |d UAB  |d Z5A  |d PIFBR  |d OTZ  |d AGLDB  |d COCUF  |d OCLCQ  |d ICG  |d WY@  |d K6U  |d U3W  |d LUE  |d D6H  |d STF  |d VNS  |d WRM  |d OCLCQ  |d VTS  |d CEF  |d VT2  |d INT  |d TOF  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d YDX  |d OCLCQ  |d LEAUB  |d CNTRU  |d MT4IT  |d UKMGB  |d UKCRE  |d VLY  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d TUHNV  |d SFB  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d INARC  |d OCLCQ 
015 |a GBA218728  |2 bnb 
015 |a GBB974792  |2 bnb 
015 |a GBA1-Z9807 
016 7 |a 017499867  |2 Uk 
016 7 |a 0415073480  |2 Uk 
019 |a 50724655  |a 50799774  |a 326982448  |a 503051144  |a 559548733  |a 646907406  |a 728056649  |a 779911267  |a 790745258  |a 961607721  |a 962724413  |a 984853480  |a 987641802  |a 992115533  |a 994815023  |a 1000436723  |a 1004366417  |a 1037750277  |a 1038686019  |a 1044355957  |a 1048236794  |a 1053383448  |a 1055358029  |a 1056412622  |a 1081273306  |a 1086530095  |a 1153544692  |a 1162520636  |a 1228597859  |a 1243608119  |a 1286902339  |a 1290063965  |a 1300543360  |a 1391287990 
020 |a 0203416686  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9780203416686  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781134906543  |q (e-book ;  |q PDF) 
020 |a 1134906544 
020 |a 9781134906499  |q (e-book ;  |q Mobi) 
020 |a 1134906498 
020 |a 9781134906536  |q (e-book ;  |q ePub) 
020 |a 1134906536 
020 |a 9781138006614  |q (paperback) 
020 |a 1138006610 
020 |a 0429231261 
020 |a 9780429231261 
020 |a 1280321105 
020 |a 9781280321108 
020 |z 0415073480 
020 |z 9780415073486 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9780203416686  |2 doi 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000051553940 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 493042288 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 11633188 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 13368805 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 13657616 
029 1 |a UKMGB  |b 017499867 
035 |a (OCoLC)50679332  |z (OCoLC)50724655  |z (OCoLC)50799774  |z (OCoLC)326982448  |z (OCoLC)503051144  |z (OCoLC)559548733  |z (OCoLC)646907406  |z (OCoLC)728056649  |z (OCoLC)779911267  |z (OCoLC)790745258  |z (OCoLC)961607721  |z (OCoLC)962724413  |z (OCoLC)984853480  |z (OCoLC)987641802  |z (OCoLC)992115533  |z (OCoLC)994815023  |z (OCoLC)1000436723  |z (OCoLC)1004366417  |z (OCoLC)1037750277  |z (OCoLC)1038686019  |z (OCoLC)1044355957  |z (OCoLC)1048236794  |z (OCoLC)1053383448  |z (OCoLC)1055358029  |z (OCoLC)1056412622  |z (OCoLC)1081273306  |z (OCoLC)1086530095  |z (OCoLC)1153544692  |z (OCoLC)1162520636  |z (OCoLC)1228597859  |z (OCoLC)1243608119  |z (OCoLC)1286902339  |z (OCoLC)1290063965  |z (OCoLC)1300543360  |z (OCoLC)1391287990 
037 |a 9781134906536  |b Ingram Content Group 
050 4 |a HB501  |b .B526 2002eb 
072 7 |a BUS  |x 027000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 332/.041  |2 21 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Birner, Jack,  |d 1951- 
245 1 4 |a The Cambridge controversies in capital theory :  |b a study in the logic of theory development /  |c Jack Birner. 
246 3 0 |a Controversies in capital theory 
260 |a London ;  |a New York :  |b Routledge,  |c 2002. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xviii, 206 pages) :  |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a data file 
490 1 |a Routledge studies in the history of economics ;  |v 47 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 188-201) and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 0 |t The K that wouldn't go away --  |t The sleepwalker effect --  |t Levels and problems --  |t Idealizations and the method of economics: some historical background --  |t The way forward --  |t A brief exposition of reswitching and capital reversing --  |t The model --  |t Characteristic propositions of neoclassical production theory --  |t Perversities and anomalies --  |t The background of the debate: some history --  |t Robinson's research programme --  |t Discontinuities in the recent history of economic thought --  |t Clouds in the neoclassical sky --  |t Robinson defines the problem --  |t Champernowne's solution --  |t Robinson returns to the problem --  |t Taking methodological stock (I) --  |t The Polish idealization model --  |t Back to the capital theory debate --  |t Correspondence and factualization --  |t An excursion into the philosophy of science --  |t Better roughly right than precisely wrong? --  |t An example of correspondence --  |t Triumph and crisis of the neoclassical production model --  |t Neoclassical triumph --  |t Crisis for the neoclassical model --  |t Taking methodological stock (II) --  |t The antipodean idealization model --  |t Aiming at a complete model of idealizations --  |t From curiosum to issue --  |t A little theorem with big consequences --  |t The symposium --  |t Neoclassical reactions --  |t Hicks hunts the snark --  |t Brown pursues the trail --  |t More neoclassical resources are mobilized --  |t Taking methodological stock (III) --  |t Tactics and moves --  |t Strategies and likelihoods --  |t AIM and PIM reconsidered --  |t Weapons --  |t The role of mathematics --  |t Mathematics as a neutral instrument. 
520 1 |a "A controversy in capital theory dominated economics in the 1960s and 1970s. Economists based in Cambridge, England detected flaws in the production model of neoclassical economics, associated with Cambridge, America. This debate established that the aggregate measure K for capital could not be used except in very special cases despite its still common usage in real business cycle theory today." 
520 8 |a "The Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory discusses the main contributions to the controversy in a series of case studies. It gradually develops a methodological model of idealizations that explains both the process of the debate and the historical ironies surrounding it, revealing that the surrounding confusion was due to the internal dynamics of the debate rather than to ideological differences. Economists were mainly engaged in attempts to solve local problems, often of a highly technical nature. This, plus the use of mathematics, led them to confuse different kinds of idealizations and to drift away from the global problems that were at stake. 
520 8 |a The main methodological result is a model describing the development of theories by a particular type of generalization: correspondence. The direction in which theories are expanded is ruled by the logical presupposition relationship between the core of a research programme and its corresponding models. This framework is used to assess Cartwright's account of scientific explanation, to solve Friedman's problem of assumptions and the problem of methodological pluralism." "This book will be of use to academics and advanced students with an interest in theoretical economics, history of economic thought, economic methodology and the philosophy of science."--Jacket 
546 |a English. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Capital. 
650 0 |a Neoclassical school of economics. 
650 6 |a École néoclassique d'économie politique. 
650 7 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS  |x Finance.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Capital.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00846272 
650 7 |a Neoclassical school of economics.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01035763 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Birner, Jack, 1951-  |t Cambridge controversies in capital theory.  |d London ; New York : Routledge, 2002  |z 0415073480  |w (DLC) 00047059  |w (OCoLC)45002220 
830 0 |a Routledge studies in the history of economics ;  |v 47. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=71389  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n BDZ0005808230 
938 |a Baker and Taylor  |b BTCP  |n BK0008764891 
938 |a CRC Press  |b CRCP  |n RUT00RU4872PDF 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 71389 
938 |a Taylor & Francis  |b TAFR  |n RUT00RU4872PDF 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 15927474 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2285233 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n cambridgecontrov0000birn 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP