Tabla de Contenidos:
  • The Lessons and The Legacy of the Pew Health Policy Program
  • Copyright
  • FOREWORD
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • CONTENTS
  • PART I. INTRODUCTION
  • THE BIRTH OF THE PEW HEALTH POLICY PROGRAM
  • RAND Corporation/University of California at Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA)
  • Boston University/Brandeis University (BU/Brandeis)
  • University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
  • University of Michigan
  • American Enterprise Institute (AEI)
  • Changes to the Programs
  • VAGUE GOALS THAT ALLOWED FOR REFLECTIVE ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING
  • HISTORY AND ORIGINS OF DEVELOPMENT
  • PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONSUniversity of California at San Francisco
  • University of Michigan
  • RAND/University of California at Los Angeles
  • Boston University/Brandeis University (BU/Brandeis)
  • THE ROLE OF THE IOM
  • NOTES ON PROGRAM STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
  • University of Michigan
  • RAND/University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Boston University/Brandeis University
  • COMMON THEMES
  • PART II. SUCCESSES AND FAILURES
  • CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
  • RECRUITMENT
  • Profiles and Targets
  • Program Champions
  • ""Finding the Best and Brightest""""MENTORING""; ""Access to Key People""; ""A Hands-on Approach""; ""COMMUNITY OF SCHOLARS""; ""Faculty Generosity""; ""EARLY FOCUS ON THE DISSERTATION""; ""Dissertation Seminars""; ""On-the-Job Training""; ""NETWORKING""; ""Shared Interests""; ""Fellowship Among Fellows""; ""MULTIDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION AND TRAINING""; ""Agents of Change""; ""LEADERSHIP ROLES""; ""Role of IOM""; ""Creating a Vision for a National Training Program""; ""A Transcendent Pew Identity""; ""Role of the Trusts""; ""THE ""PRICE"" OF INSTITUTIONALIZATIONâ€?FINANCING ISSUES""
  • University of MichiganUniversity of California, San Francisco
  • Brandeis University/Boston University
  • RAND/UCLA
  • PART III. DETERMINING THE LEGACY
  • WHERE ARE THE PEW FELLOWS TODAY?
  • Career Trajectories
  • Professional Distribution
  • Movement Between Professional Fields
  • IMPORTANCE OF DOCTORAL PROGRAM COMPLETION
  • Doctoral Completion Rates
  • Effect of Program Noncompletion
  • Other Comments About Doctoral Program Completion
  • UNCOVERING THE PHPP LEGACY
  • Informants' Reflections on the Meaning of Legacy
  • Legacy as Bridging Theory and PracticeLegacy in Terms of Scale and Scope
  • Legacy as Information Processing and Dissemination
  • Legacy as Professionalization of Health Policy
  • Legacy as Offering New Conceptual Models
  • Legacy as the Future Impact
  • The Legacy in Summary
  • ANSWERING FUTURE NEEDS AND OFFERING ADVICE
  • PART IV. SUMMARIZING THE LEGACY: SOME CONCLUSIONS AND THOUSAND FOR THE FUTURE
  • A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING THE PHPP EXPERIENCE: BASIC AND INTEGRATIVE ELEMENTS
  • DEVELOPING STRATEGIC PROGRAM VISIONS: BASIC ELEMENTS