Law and Practice of the Common Commercial Policy The First 10 Years after the Treaty of Lisbon.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Boston :
BRILL,
2020.
|
Colección: | Studies in EU External Relations Ser.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Half Title
- Series Information
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Forewords
- Abbreviations
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction: 10 Years Common Commercial Policy Since the Treaty of Lisbon
- 1 A Bird's Eye Perspective on the EU's Trade and Investment Policies Since the Treaty of Lisbon
- 2 Outline of the Book
- 3 Outlook: Priorities for the EU's ccp in the Next Decade
- Part 1 The Scope of the ccp
- Chapter 1 Mixity and the Common Commercial Policy after Opinion 2/15: An Overview
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Union External Competence: a Categorisation
- 3 The Enlarged Scope of the ccp
- 4 Exclusivity by Virtue of Article 3(2) tfeu
- 5 The cfsp
- 6 Conclusion: When Are Union-only Agreements Legally Necessary or Legally Possible?
- Chapter 2 Defining the Scope of the Common Commercial Policy
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Defining the Field of Action
- 3 Regulatory Measures and the ccp
- 3.1 Governing the Adoption and Implementation of Regulatory Measures
- 3.2 Establishing Regulatory Standards
- 4 The ccp and Non-commercial Purposes
- 5 Some Concluding Observations
- Part 2 The EU's Investment Policies
- Chapter 3 The First 10 Years of the European Union's Policy on Investment Dispute Settlement: From Initial Reforms to the Multilateral Investment Court
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Setting the Scene: the Framework Created by the Treaty of Lisbon and the EU's Framework Legislation
- 2.1 The Initial Understanding of the Treaty framework
- 2.2 The Grandfathering Regulation (Regulation EU No. 1219/2012)
- 2.3 The Financial Responsibility Regulation (Regulation EU No. 912/2014) and the Respondent Mechanism
- 3 Opinion 2/15 on the Singapore fta
- 4 Initial Policy Approaches: the 2010 Communication and the Initial Treaties with 3rd Countries
- 4.1 The 2010 Communication on Investment Policy
- 4.2 The Initial Approach in ceta and the Agreements with Singapore and India
- 4.3 The uncitral Transparency Rules and the Mauritius Convention
- 5 The Policy Shift to the Investment Court System
- 5.1 The Initial Traces in the 2010 Communication on Investment Policy
- 5.2 The 2015 Concept Paper/ttip Proposal
- 5.3 ceta and the Agreements with Singapore, Vietnam and Mexico
- 6 The Multilateral Investment Court
- 6.1 The 2015 Concept Paper and ceta
- 6.2 The EU's Negotiating Directives (March 2018)
- 6.3 uncitral Discussions
- 7 Conclusion: the Next 10 Years?
- Acknowledgement
- Chapter 4 Opinion 1/17: Legitimising the EU's Investment Court System but Raising the Bar for Compliance with EU Law
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Opinion 1/17: a Legal Analysis
- 2.1 The Compatibility of ceta's ics with the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order
- 2.1.1 The ecj's Autonomy Criteria and Belgium's Doubts about the ics
- 2.1.2 Constitutional Principles