Cargando…

Law and Practice of the Common Commercial Policy The First 10 Years after the Treaty of Lisbon.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Hahn, Michael
Otros Autores: Van der Loo, Guillaume
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Boston : BRILL, 2020.
Colección:Studies in EU External Relations Ser.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Half Title
  • Series Information
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Contents
  • Acknowledgements
  • Forewords
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes on Contributors
  • Introduction: 10 Years Common Commercial Policy Since the Treaty of Lisbon
  • 1 A Bird's Eye Perspective on the EU's Trade and Investment Policies Since the Treaty of Lisbon
  • 2 Outline of the Book
  • 3 Outlook: Priorities for the EU's ccp in the Next Decade
  • Part 1 The Scope of the ccp
  • Chapter 1 Mixity and the Common Commercial Policy after Opinion 2/15: An Overview
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Union External Competence: a Categorisation
  • 3 The Enlarged Scope of the ccp
  • 4 Exclusivity by Virtue of Article 3(2) tfeu
  • 5 The cfsp
  • 6 Conclusion: When Are Union-only Agreements Legally Necessary or Legally Possible?
  • Chapter 2 Defining the Scope of the Common Commercial Policy
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Defining the Field of Action
  • 3 Regulatory Measures and the ccp
  • 3.1 Governing the Adoption and Implementation of Regulatory Measures
  • 3.2 Establishing Regulatory Standards
  • 4 The ccp and Non-commercial Purposes
  • 5 Some Concluding Observations
  • Part 2 The EU's Investment Policies
  • Chapter 3 The First 10 Years of the European Union's Policy on Investment Dispute Settlement: From Initial Reforms to the Multilateral Investment Court
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Setting the Scene: the Framework Created by the Treaty of Lisbon and the EU's Framework Legislation
  • 2.1 The Initial Understanding of the Treaty framework
  • 2.2 The Grandfathering Regulation (Regulation EU No. 1219/2012)
  • 2.3 The Financial Responsibility Regulation (Regulation EU No. 912/2014) and the Respondent Mechanism
  • 3 Opinion 2/15 on the Singapore fta
  • 4 Initial Policy Approaches: the 2010 Communication and the Initial Treaties with 3rd Countries
  • 4.1 The 2010 Communication on Investment Policy
  • 4.2 The Initial Approach in ceta and the Agreements with Singapore and India
  • 4.3 The uncitral Transparency Rules and the Mauritius Convention
  • 5 The Policy Shift to the Investment Court System
  • 5.1 The Initial Traces in the 2010 Communication on Investment Policy
  • 5.2 The 2015 Concept Paper/ttip Proposal
  • 5.3 ceta and the Agreements with Singapore, Vietnam and Mexico
  • 6 The Multilateral Investment Court
  • 6.1 The 2015 Concept Paper and ceta
  • 6.2 The EU's Negotiating Directives (March 2018)
  • 6.3 uncitral Discussions
  • 7 Conclusion: the Next 10 Years?
  • Acknowledgement
  • Chapter 4 Opinion 1/17: Legitimising the EU's Investment Court System but Raising the Bar for Compliance with EU Law
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Opinion 1/17: a Legal Analysis
  • 2.1 The Compatibility of ceta's ics with the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order
  • 2.1.1 The ecj's Autonomy Criteria and Belgium's Doubts about the ics
  • 2.1.2 Constitutional Principles