A Bridge over Troubled Waters Dispute Resolution in the Law of International Watercourses and the Law of the Sea.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Otros Autores: | , , |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Boston :
BRILL,
2020.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Half Title
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 'Traditional' Methods of Dispute Settlement
- Chapter 1 The icj Judgment in the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project Case and Its Aftermath: Success or Failure?
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Planned and the Realised Projects
- a Short Description
- 3 A Possible Reading of the icj Judgment
- 3.1 The Hungarian Objectives and the icj Judgment
- 3.1.1 Harmony between the Judgment and the Hungarian Goals
- 3.1.1.1 Nagymaros and Peak Operation
- 3.1.1.2 Gabčíkovo Operating in an Environmentally Sustainable Manner and Adequate Water Quantity and Dynamics Assured in the Main Riverbed and the Side Arms
- 3.1.1.3 Hungary Is Entitled to Its Sovereign Share in the Water Flow, Ensuring Reasonable and Equitable Access
- 3.1.1.4 Variant C Remains Illegal until Settlement of the Dispute and All Its Resulting Damages Must Be Compensated for by Slovakia
- 3.1.1.5 The Unilateral Operation of the Existing System Must Be Replaced with a System Based on the Agreement of the Parties (Not Necessarily a Common Operation)
- 3.1.2 Hungarian Goals Not Achieved
- 3.1.2.1 The Return of All the Water Flow into the Main Riverbed (Stopping Gabčíkovo) and the Return of International Navigation into the River Forming the Border between the Two Countries
- 3.1.2.2 The Acceptance of the Suspension and Later Stop of Works at Nagymaros and Elsewhere in 1989
- 3.1.2.3 The Formal Termination of the 1977 Treaty
- 3.2 Balance: the Judgment and the Hungarian Objectives
- 4 Bilateral Interactions 1997-2018
- 4.1 The Betrayal of the Judgment (1997 September-1998 April)
- 4.2 The "period of limited hope and growing hopelessness" (1998 April-2010 April)
- 4.2.1 A Non-Archaic Torso: the Fate of the Request for an Additional Judgment
- 4.2.2 The Period of Hope (1998-2001)
- 4.2.3 Growing Hopelessness 2002-2010
- 4.3 The Period of Stagnation, Secrecy and an Effort to Rekindle (2010-Present (2018))
- 5 Enigma or Just the New Normal? An Attempt to Interpret
- Bibliography
- Chapter 2 Third-Party Intervention and Involvement in Inter-State Arbitration
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Dispute Settlement under Part xv of unclos
- 3 History of Intervention in International Proceedings
- 4 Annex vii Arbitration
- A A Tribunal May Have the Power, under Annex vii of unclos, to Permit Intervention
- B Factors Relevant to the Exercise of an Annex vii Tribunal's Powers in Respect of Intervention
- C The Procedures and Grounds for Intervention
- D Conclusion as to the Power of an Annex vii Tribunal
- 5 South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China)
- 6 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Chapter 3 Choice of Forum for Settlement of Law of the Sea Disputes