Persecution, International Refugee Law and Refugees A Feminist Approach.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Crépin, Mathilde
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Milton : Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.
Colección:Law and Migration Ser.
Temas:
Political refugees > Legal status, laws, etc.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • Half Title
  • Series Page
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Table of Contents
  • Introduction
  • I.1 Background and context of thesis
  • I.2 Methodology
  • Sources used and scope of the research
  • Line of argumentation of the research
  • I.3 Outline of research
  • 1. The notion of persecution, historical background and interpretive challenges in the 21st century
  • 1.1 The emergence of the notion of persecution in international refugee law
  • 1.1.1 Legal developments and the progressive conceptualisation of who is a refugee in international law
  • 1.1.2 The emergence of the notion of persecution as a pivotal concept in the refugee definition
  • 1.1.3 Universalisation of the 1951 Convention
  • 1.2 A changing geopolitical context
  • 1.2.1 Interpreting the notion of persecution during the cold war polarity: a political understanding of the refugee definition
  • 1.2.2 Emerging trends of displacements in the 20th century
  • 1.3 Interpretive challenges
  • 1.3.1 The notion of persecution: a malleable notion?
  • 1.3.2 A need for consistent interpretations of the notion of persecution?
  • 1.3.3 Basis of definition
  • I Persecution akin to the non-refoulement principle?
  • ii The definition of persecution in international criminal law
  • 1.4 Concluding remarks
  • 2. Developing an interpretive framework for interpreting the notion of persecution: an assessment of the basic human rights interpretive model
  • 2.1 Legal and theoretical justifications for referring to human rights as interpretive benchmarks
  • 2.1.1 Teleological approach to refugee law: the 1951 Convention as a human rights instrument?
  • 2.1.2 International refugee law as a self-contained regime?
  • 2.1.3 The compromise: human rights as the orthodoxy?
  • 2.1.4 Concluding remarks
  • 2.2 The quantitative and qualitative aspects of persecution
  • 2.2.1 Qualitative aspect of persecution: basic human rights used as interpretive benchmarks
  • Serious harm: which human rights should be used as benchmarks?
  • Basic human rights approach: a framework that is too broad?
  • Basic human rights: vague notions?
  • (A) Shifting the interpretive exercise to an equally vague'discursive terrain'
  • (B) Human rights jurisprudence: a solution to preciseinterpretive guidance?
  • Basic human rights approach: a restrictive framework?
  • 2.2.2 Quantitative aspect of persecution
  • Sustained and systemic approach: a restrictive threshold?
  • The basic human rights approach: a formalist and uniform threshold
  • 2.3 The surrogacy principle as part of the persecution test?
  • 2.3.1 The notion of state protection wrongly equated with the test of persecution?
  • 2.3.2 Persecution: a bifurcated approach to the Internal Flight Alternative (IFA) test?
  • 2.4 Inconsistent applications of the basic human rights framework in national jurisdictions
  • 2.5 Conclusion

Ejemplares similares