Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • AIR POLLUTION AND SHIP EMISSIONS
  • AIR POLLUTION AND SHIP EMISSIONS
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • Chapter 1 AIR POLLUTION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS
  • SUMMARY
  • INTRODUCTION
  • MARPOL ANNEX VI
  • Provisions of Annex VI
  • Implementing Legislation (P.L. 110-280)
  • Amendments to Annex VI
  • EPA Regulations
  • OTHER LEGISLATION
  • FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL MEASURES
  • EPA Regulations
  • Category 3 Engines
  • Category 1 and 2 Engines
  • California Emission Reduction Measures
  • Low Sulfur Fuels
  • Emission Controls
  • Alternative Power
  • Grants
  • GREENHOUSE GASES
  • International Efforts to Address GHGs
  • Shipping vs. Other Transport Modes
  • Measures to Reduce Ships' GHG Emissions
  • CONCLUSION
  • End Notes
  • Chapter 2 EMISSION CONTROL AREA PROPOSAL FOR SHIPS FACT SHEET
  • REGULATORY ANNOUNCEMENT: PROPOSAL OF EMISSION CONTROL AREA DESIGNATION FOR GEOGRAPHIC CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS
  • EPA-420-F-09-015, March 2009
  • Overview
  • The Need to Reduce Emissions from Engines on Ships
  • Emission Control Area Standards
  • Costs
  • Benefits
  • Next Steps
  • End Notes
  • Chapter 3 EPA NEEDS TO IMPROVE ITS EFFORTS TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS AT U.S. PORTS
  • ABBREVIATIONS
  • WHY WE DID THIS REVIEW
  • BACKGROUND
  • WHAT WE FOUND
  • WHAT WE RECOMMEND
  • ACTION REQUIRED
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • Purpose
  • Background
  • Sources of Emissions
  • Impacts of Air Pollution from Port Activities
  • Projected Port Growth and Impacts
  • EPA's Multipronged Approach to Reducing Emissions at U.S. Ports
  • EPA Regulatory Authority
  • Key EPA Voluntary Strategies
  • Clean Ports USA Program, SmartWay Transport Partnership, and Regional Diesel Collaboratives
  • EPA's Work with the International Maritime Organization
  • Noteworthy Achievements
  • Scope and Methodology.
  • 2. RECENT AGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL ACTIONS HAVE POTENTIAL TO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE HARMFUL EMISSIONS FROM OCEANGOING VESSEL ENGINES
  • Air Emissions from Large Oceangoing Vessel Engines Have Been Essentially Unregulated by EPA
  • NOx
  • PM and SOx
  • CO, HC, and Air Toxics
  • EPA Has Chosen to Defer Taking a Position on Whether It Has Authority to Regulate Foreign-Flagged Vessel Engine Emissions
  • EPA Stated a Need to Regulate Foreign-Flagged Vessel Engine Emissions in 2002
  • Agency Efforts Have Only Recently Resulted in an International Agreement Which Could Achieve Substantial Emission Reductions
  • Proposed Revisions to MARPOL Annex VI Adopted
  • Comparing the IMO Agreement and the U.S. Proposal
  • Importance of IMO Emission Control Areas
  • Next Steps in the IMO Process
  • EPA's Delay in Controlling Oceangoing Vessel Engine Emissions May Have Long-Term Effects
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
  • Agency Comments and OIG Evaluation
  • 3. IMPLEMENTING EPA'S APPROACH TO REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS AT U.S. PORTS NEEDS IMPROVING
  • EPA's Approach Is Incomplete
  • Limited Data to Verify Results of Voluntary Actions
  • Voluntary Initiatives Have Not Been Implemented at Many U.S. Ports
  • Opportunities Exist to Improve Participation in Regional Diesel Collaboratives
  • EPA Verified Technologies Are Major Component of Voluntary Emission Reduction Efforts, But Funding is Limited
  • Limited Resources for Implementing EPA's Efforts to Reduce Port Emissions
  • EPA's New Strategy for Sustainable Ports Lacks a Transformation Plan
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendation
  • Agency Comments and OIG Evaluation
  • STATUS OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND POTENTIAL MONETARY BENEFITS
  • APPENDIX A. PROJECTED GROWTH OF U.S. PORTS DUE TO CONTAINER SHIPPING
  • APPENDIX B. KEY EPA REGULATIONS FOR FIVE MAJOR SOURCES OF PORT EMISSIONS
  • Oceangoing Vessels
  • Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks.
  • Cargo-Handling Equipment
  • Harbor Craft and Locomotives
  • APPENDIX C. DETAILS ON SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
  • Review of Management (Internal) Controls
  • Prior Reports
  • Prior GAO Reports
  • APPENDIX D. DETAILS ON EPA'S RATIONALE FOR NOT TAKING A POSITION ON WHETHER IT HAS AUTHORITY TO REGULATE FOREIGN-FLAGGED VESSELS
  • APPENDIX E. TIMELINE OF SELECTED EPA REGULATORY ACTIONS SINCE 1990 TO ADDRESS AIR EMISSIONS FROM PORT SOURCES
  • APPENDIX F. SUMMARY OF REVISED MARPOL ANNEX VI STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE IMO IN OCTOBER 2008
  • APPENDIX G. STATUS OF PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL DIESEL COLLABORATIVES FOR PORTS IN NONATTAINMENT AREAS
  • APPENDIX H. DETAILS OF EPA'S STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE PORTS
  • APPENDIX I. AGENCY RESPONSE TO DRAFT REPORT
  • Recommendations-Chapter 2
  • Recommendation-Chapter 3
  • General Comments and/or Clarifications
  • APPENDIX J. OIG EVALUATION OF AGENCY RESPONSE
  • APPENDIX K. DISTRIBUTION
  • End Notes
  • Chapter 4 FAQ ON EMISSION CONTROL AREA
  • WHAT ARE THE INTERNATIONAL MARINE STANDARDS AND WHY IS APPLICATION FOR AREA DESIGNATION NECESSARY?
  • WHO CAN APPLY FOR ECA DESIGNATION?
  • WHAT ARE THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF AN ECA APPLICATION?
  • WHAT IS THE EXPECTED TIMELINE FOR THE U.S. ECA APPLICATION TO THE IMO? WHEN AN APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED, WHAT ARE THE STEPS AND TIME-LINE FOR APPROVAL AND FOR IMPLEMENTATION?
  • HOW WOULD VESSEL OPERATORS BE AFFECTED?
  • ARE THERE ANY ECAS CURRENTLY IN EFFECT?
  • IS THE U.S. INTENDING TO SUBMIT A JOINT APPLICATION WITH CANADA AND/OR MEXICO?
  • HOW FAR OFF THE U.S. COASTLINE WILL THE ECA EXTEND? HOW WILL PRACTICALITIES LIKE THE SOVEREIGN WATERS OF ADJACENT NATIONS BE HANDLED IN THE APPLICATION?
  • WILL THE COASTS OF ALASKA AND HAWAII (AND OTHER U.S. TERRITORIES) BE INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION? IF NOT, CAN THEY BE INCLUDED IN THE FUTURE?
  • WILL DESIGNATION OF A U.S. ECA ENCOURAGE SHIPPING LINES TO DIVERT "DISCRETIONARY" SHIPMENTS AWAY FROM U.S. PORTS (IN FAVOR OF NEARBY PORTS NOT WITHIN THE DESIGNATED ECA)?
  • WILL THE LOW-SULFUR FUEL THAT MEETS THE ECA REQUIREMENTS BE AVAILABLE WHEN THE U.S. ECA GOES INTO FORCE? WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF THE FUEL IS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIME?
  • WHAT ARE THE PROJECTED HEALTH BENEFITS FROM A U.S. ECA DESIGNATION? PROJECTED ECONOMIC BENEFITS? HOW DO THESE OUTWEIGH THE DIFFERENTIAL FUEL COSTS?
  • HOW WOULD A U.S. ECA BE IMPLEMENTED AND ENFORCED UNDER U.S. LAW?
  • HOW DOES AN ECA FIT INTO EPA'S CLEAN AIR ACT PROGRAM?
  • End Notes
  • Chapter 5 INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION ADOPTS PROGRAM TO CONTROL AIR EMISSIONS FROM OCEANGOING VESSELS
  • WHAT DID THE IMO DO?
  • WHAT SHIPS ARE AFFECTED?
  • HOW DO OCEANGOING VESSELS HARM U.S. AIR QUALITY?
  • WHAT WILL THIS PROGRAM MEAN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT?
  • WHY IS THE IMO PROCESS IMPORTANT?
  • WHAT ARE THE NEW STANDARDS?
  • HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO EPA'S RECENT ADVANCE NOTICE ON REDUCING POLLUTION FROM OCEANGOING VESSELS?
  • Chapter 6 PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE ON EMISSION CONTROL AREA FOR NITROGEN OXIDES, SULPHUR OXIDES AND PARTICULATE MATTER
  • SUMMARY
  • INTRODUCTION
  • SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
  • Populations and Areas at Risk
  • Contributions from Ships to Adverse Impacts
  • Description of Area
  • Ship Traffic and Meteorological Conditions
  • Land-Based Emissions Controls
  • Estimated Costs
  • CONCLUSION
  • ACTION REQUESTED
  • ANNEX 1. INFORMATION RESPONDING TO THE CRITERIA IN APPENDIX III TO ANNEX VI
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. Countries Submitting this ECA Proposal
  • 1.2. Criteria for Designation of an Emission Control Area
  • 2. Description of Area Proposed for ECA Designation
  • 2.1. Proposed Area of Application
  • 2.2. Types of Emissions Proposed for Control
  • 2.2.1. SOX and PM
  • 2.2.2. NOX.
  • 2.2.3. Other Forms of Pollutants
  • 2.3. Populations and Areas at Risk from Exposure to Ship Emissions
  • 2.4. Conclusion
  • 3. CONTRIBUTION OF SHIPS TO AIR POLLUTION AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS
  • 3.1. Synopsis of the Assessment
  • 3.2. U.S. and Canadian Emissions Inventory Summary
  • 3.2.1. Emissions Inventory Modelling and Inputs for 2020 Current Performance Scenario
  • 3.2.2. Emissions Inventory Development for 2020 ECA Performance Scenario
  • 3.3. Ships' Contribution to Ambient Air Quality
  • 3.3.1. Overview of Air Quality Modelling
  • 3.3.2. Ships' Contribution to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone Air Pollution in the U.S.
  • 3.3.2.1. PM2.5 Contribution
  • 3.3.2.2. Ozone Contribution
  • 3.3.3. Ships' Contribution to Ambient Air Pollution in Canada
  • 3.3.4. Improvement of Ambient Air Quality in the U.S. with the ECA
  • 3.3.5. Improvement of Ambient Air Quality in Canada with the ECA
  • 3.3.6. Conclusions
  • 4. Impact of Emissions from Ships on Human Health
  • 4.1. Health Effects Related to Exposure to Air Pollutants
  • 4.1.1. Nature of PM Health Effects
  • 4.1.2. Nature of Ozone Health Effects
  • 4.2. Quantified Human Health Impacts from Exposure to Ship Emissions
  • 4.2.1. U.S. Human Health Impacts
  • 4.2.2. Canadian Human Health Impacts
  • 4.3. Conclusion
  • 5. Impact of Emissions from Ships on Ecosystems
  • 5.1. Overview of Deposition Resulting from Ship NOX, SOX and PM Emissions
  • 5.1.1. Environmental and Ecosystem Impacts and Areas at Risk
  • 5.1.2. U.S. Modelling Results for Sulphur and Nitrogen Deposition
  • 5.1.3. Canadian Modelling Results for Sulphur and Nitrogen Deposition
  • 5.1.4. Exceedances of Ecosystem Critical Deposition Loads in Canada Resulting from Ship Emissions
  • 5.2. Impacts Associated with Deposition of PM2.5 and Air Toxics
  • 5.3. U.S. Visibility Impacts
  • 5.4. Ozone Impacts on Forest Health
  • 5.5. Conclusion.