Justice for Crimes Against Humanity.
This book assesses developments in international law and seeks to end impunity by bringing to justice those accused of crimes against humanity.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
London :
Bloomsbury Publishing,
2003.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Half Title Page
- Half Title verso
- Title Page
- Title verso
- Preface
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Introduction
- HUMAN RIGHTS, THE LAWS OF WAR AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMES
- THE CASE OF SENATOR PINOCHET
- ONE LAW FOR ONE WORLD?
- THE POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE
- WHAT IS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE FOR?
- INTERNATIONAL LAW AFTER PINOCHET AND MILOŠEVIĆ
- Part I: Atrocity, Impunity, Justice
- 1. From Nuremberg to Rome: A Personal Account
- PRELUDE TO NUREMBERG
- THE TRIALS AT NUREMBERG
- THE EINSATZGRUPPEN TRIAL.
- COMPENSATING VICTIMS OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
- ESTABLISHING INTERNATIONAL NORMS
- THE SECURITY COUNCIL ACTS: THE NEW AD HOC TRIBUNALS
- A PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
- 2. Univesrsal Jurisdiction: New Uses for an Old Tool
- FIVE TYPES OF GEOGRAPHIC JURISDICTION
- NATIONAL LAW RESTRICTIONS ON THE SCOPE OF UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
- A SHORT HISTORY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
- PRACTICAL REASONS FOR UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
- LEGAL, PHILOSOPHICAL AND MORAL RATIONALES FOR UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
- ANSWERS TO CRITICISMS OF UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION.
- NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE
- OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
- CONCLUSION: PROSPECTS FOR UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION
- 3. Immunities for Heads of State: Where Do We Stand?
- RELEVANT CONCEPTS
- LIMITS TO IMPUNITY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND HEADS OF STATE BEFORE INTERNATIONAL COURTS
- LIMITS TO IMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND HEADS OF STATE BEFORE THE NATIONAL COURTS OF THEIR OWN STATE
- LIMITS TO IMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND HEADS OF STATE BEFORE THE NATIONAL COURTS OF FOREIGN STATES
- THE QUESTION OF IMMUNITY IN THE PINOCHET CASE.
- THE QUESTION OF IMMUNITY IN THE DRC V BELGIUM CASE
- CONCLUSION
- 4. Their Atrocities and Our Misdemeanours: The Reticence of States to Try Their 'Own Nationals for International Crimes'
- CIRCUMSTANCES CONDUCIVE TO DOMESTIC TRIALS OFOWN NATIONALS
- DOMESTIC TRIALS BY STATES IN POLITICAL TRANSITION
- DOMESTIC TRIALS INFLUENCED BY INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS
- DOMESTIC TRIALS FOR SERIOUS BREACHES OF MILITARY DISCIPLINE
- CONCLUSION
- Part II: Justice in International and Mixed Law Courts
- 5. The International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.
- ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA
- JURISDICTION OF THE ICTY
- EARLY JURISPRUDENCE OF THE ICTY
- EVALUATION OF THE TRIBUNALS' RECORD TO DATE
- KEY CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE
- THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA
- CONCLUSION
- 6. The Collection and Admissibility of Evidence and the Rights of the Accused
- AGE OF THE EVIDENCE
- SCOPE OF THE TRIALS
- ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
- THE EXTENT OF RELAXATION
- WITNESS PROTECTION
- COLLECTION OF EVIDENCE FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES AND ORGANISATIONS
- CONCLUSION.