Cargando…
Civil-Military 'Legal' Relations : the Civilian Courts and the Military in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Boston :
BRILL,
2018.
|
| Colección: | International Humanitarian Law Ser.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro; Civil-Military 'Legal' Relations:Where to from Here?: The Civilian Courts and the Military in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; Glossary; 1 Civil-Military 'Legal' Control; 1 Control of Power; 2 Militarisation of the Civil; 3 The Civil-Military Gap-Changing Institutional Roles; 4 Employment Rights and Recruitment Issues; Conclusion; 2 Civil-Military 'Power' Relations; 1 Civil-Military Evaluative Theories in Certain Democratic Societies; 1.1 Professionalisation of the Military; 1.2 Civilianisation of the Military.
- 1.3 Hybrid Theories2 The Theory Hiatus-No Courts; 3 The Courts' Role; Conclusion; 3 The United Kingdom; 1 Historical Overview of the UK Military; 1.1 The Beginnings; 1.2 Parliamentary Control; 1.3 Types of Military Tribunals; 2 Overview of UK Courts; 2.1 Independence of the Judiciary; 2.2 Deference; 2.3 Human Rights in the United Kingdom; 3 Interrelations between the Courts and the Military; Conclusion; 4 Discipline of Soldiers for Actions in an Occupation Zone; 1 Background; 2 UK Military Discipline; 3 Al-Skeini-the Decisions; 3.1 Divisional Court [2004]; 3.2 Court of Appeal [2005].
- 3.3 House of Lords [2007]3.4 Grand Chamber [2011]; 4 The Courts' Justifications; 4.1 Prescriptive Jurisdiction; 4.2 State Practice, Derogations and Declarations; 4.3 Precedent; 5 Absurdities: Limiting Universal Rights-Territorially and Culturally; 5.1 Territorially; 5.2 Culturally; 6 Consequences for the Civil-Military Relationship; 6.1 Separation of Powers; 6.2 Lawyers and the Military; 6.3 The Civil-Military Gap: Morals/Values; 6.4 Resistance to Change; 6.5 The Court's Changing Response; Conclusion; 5 US Institutions of Government; 1 Overview of the US Military.
- 1.1 Early Military Discipline1.2 WWI and WWII; 1.3 Uniform Code of Military Justice; 2 Differences between Civil and Military Systems; 3 Overview of the Supreme Court; 3.1 Role of the Supreme Court; 3.2 Pre-Rehnquist Supreme Court Jurisprudence; 3.3 Rehnquist Era (1971-2005); 4 The Court's Influence on the Civil-Military Relationship; 4.1 The Separation of Powers; 4.2 Separate Society and the Civil-Military Gap; 4.3 Militarisation Creep; 4.4 Dissenters: Deontological Concerns; Conclusion; 6 Civilians in Combat; 1 The Congressional Response to PMCs-the Legislation.
- 1.1 Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act1.2 Uniform Code of Military Justice; 2 The Courts' Response-Case Law; 2.1 Civilian Prosecution of Military Persons; 2.2 Court-Martial of a Civilian Contractor: Case 1; a) The Facts; b) The Arguments; c) The Court's Reasoning; 2.3 Civilian Prosecution of PMCs: Case 2; 3 Consequences of the Court's Approach; 7 Australian Civil-Military Relations; 1 Reception of English Military Law in Australia; 2 Defence Force Discipline Act 1982; 3 High Court of Australia and the Military; 4 Types of Offences; 5 Parliament: Senate Inquiry 2005.