The Right to Food and the World Trade Organization's Rules on Agriculture : Conflicting, Compatible, or Complementary?.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Boston :
BRILL,
2018.
|
Colección: | International Studies in Human Rights Ser.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro
- The Right to Food and the WorldTrade Organization's Rules onAgriculture
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
- Inter-American Court
- European Court of Human rights
- GATT
- International Court of Justice
- Permanent Court of International Justice
- WTO Cases
- Domestic Decisions
- India
- South Africa
- United Kingdom
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1.1 Rationale
- 1.2 Methodology
- 1.2.1 Scope
- 1.2.2 Approach to Analysis
- 1.3 Structure
- The Fragmentation of International Law
- the World Trade Organization and International Human Rights Regimes
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 What is Fragmentation?
- 2.2.1 Academic and Practitioner Concerns
- 2.2.2 Narratives
- 2.3 Characteristics of a Fragmented International Legal Order
- 2.3.1 Global Legal Pluralism
- 2.3.1.1 Regionalism
- 2.3.2 Voluntarism
- 2.3.3 Indeterminacy
- 2.3.4 Hierarchy, or the Absence Thereof
- 2.3.4.1 Jus Cogens Norms
- 2.3.4.2 The Charter of the United Nations
- United Nations Security Council Resolutions
- 2.3.4.3 Erga Omnes Obligations
- 2.3.5 Specialization
- 2.3.5.1 Self-Contained Regimes
- 2.4 Regimes of Relevance
- 2.4.1 World Trade Organization
- 2.4.1.1 The World Trade Organization and General International Law
- 2.4.1.2 The World Trade Organization and Other Special Law
- 2.4.2 International Human Rights Law
- 2.4.2.1 Interpretation of Human Rights Instruments
- Replacing or Filling in for General International Law
- 2.4.2.2 The Place of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Human Rights Law
- 2.5 Conclusion
- Conflict of Norms in International Law
- Theories and Practice
- 3.1 Introduction to Conflict of Norms
- 3.2 Defining Parameters
- 3.2.1 The Focus on Norms in International Law.
- 3.2.2 Legal Norms, Non-Legal Norms, and the Threshold of Legality
- 3.3 To Whom are Obligations Owed, and Why does it Matter to Norm Conflict Theories and Resolution Techniques?
- 3.3.1 'AB:AB' and 'AB:AC' Types of Conflicts
- 3.4 Apparent Versus Genuine Conflicts
- 3.5 Problematizing the Presumption Against Conflict
- 3.5.1 Strategic Conflicts
- 3.6 Defining Conflict of Norms
- 3.6.1 Logical Inconsistency as Conflict in Normative Systems
- 3.6.2 Narrow Definitions in International Law Doctrine
- 3.6.2.1 Problematizing Narrow Definitions
- 3.6.3 Broadening the Scope of Conflict
- 3.6.3.1 Clashes of Values as Norm Conflict
- 3.6.4 Conflict Definitions in Practice
- 3.7 Conflict Resolution
- the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Techniques
- 3.7.1 Limitations of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
- 3.7.1.1 Same Subject-Matter as a Criterion
- 3.7.1.2 Principle of Political Decision
- 3.7.2 Lex prior
- 3.7.3 Lex posterior
- 3.7.4 Lex specialis
- 3.8 Conclusion
- The Human Right to Adequate Food and Corresponding Obligations
- 4.1 Introduction to the Right to Adequate Food
- 4.2 The Right to Food as an Economic, Social, and Cultural Right
- 4.2.1 The Proliferation of Voluntary Instruments on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
- 4.3 Key Formal Source in International Law: ICESCR
- 4.3.1 Overarching Obligations
- 4.3.1.1 Progressive Realization
- 4.3.1.2 Available Resources
- Minimum Core
- 4.3.1.3 International Cooperation-Financial and Technical
- 4.3.1.4 Responsibility and Individual States
- 4.3.2 The Right to Food
- 4.3.2.1 Article 11.1
- 4.3.2.2 Article 11.2
- To Improve Methods of Production
- To Improve Conservation
- To Improve Distribution
- Making use of Technical and Scientific Knowledge
- Agrarian Reform.
- Addressing the Problems of Net Food-Importing and Net Food-Exporting Countries
- 4.4 Notes on the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and General Comment 12
- 4.5 Collective Responsibility
- 4.6 Concepts Related to the Right to Food
- 4.6.1 Food Security
- 4.6.2 Food Sovereignty
- 4.7 Conclusion
- Market Access
- 5.1 Introduction to Market Accessibility
- 5.2 Market Access in the Multilateral Trade System
- Divergent Opinions
- 5.2.1 Rationale for Reducing Barriers to Market Access in Light of the Right to Food
- 5.2.1.1 To Create an Enabling Environment
- 5.2.1.2 To Enhance Economic Access to Food for Producers
- 5.2.1.3 To Promote the Efficient use of Resources and Improved Production
- 5.2.1.4 To Promote the Availability of Food for Consumers
- 5.2.2 Rationale for Maintaining Regulatory Autonomy or Protectionist Measures Regarding Market Access in Light of the Right to Food
- 5.2.2.1 To Protect Producer Livelihoods
- 5.2.2.2 To Maintain Production Capacity and to Respect Current Levels of Food Access and Availability
- 5.2.2.3 To Ensure Food Quality, Safety, and Acceptability
- 5.2.2.4 Other Considerations with Respect to Regulatory Autonomy
- 5.3 Market Access Provisions Under the Agreement on Agriculture
- 5.3.1 Primary Source of the Obligation to Reduce Barriers to Market Access
- 5.3.2 Conversion of Barriers into Tariffs and the Prohibition of Non-Tariff Barriers
- 5.3.3 Special Safeguard Measures
- 5.3.4 Special Treatment
- 5.3.4.1 Issues Arising from Tariffication
- 5.4 Are the Elements of a Conflict of Norms Present Between the Right to Food and Market Access Provisions?
- 5.4.1 The Same Subject-Matter Criterion
- 5.4.2 Choice of Definitions
- Beginning with Narrow Definitions and the Test of Joint Compliance
- 5.4.3 Broadening the Scope of Definitions and the Test of Violation.
- 5.4.3.1 Subjectivity and 'Appropriate' Measures
- 5.4.4 Exemptions and Permissions
- 5.4.4.1 A Closer Look at the Exemptions and Flexibilities for Developing Countries in regard to Market Access Commitments
- 5.4.4.2 The Limitations of the Special Safeguard Measures
- 5.4.4.3 The Limitations of the Special Treatment Flexibilities
- 5.5 Conclusion
- Domestic and Export Subsidies
- 6.1 Introduction to Subsidies in the World Trade Regime
- 6.2 Agricultural Subsidies and the Right to Food
- 6.2.1 Rationale for the Provision of Support to Agriculture in Light of the Right to Food
- 6.2.1.1 To Improve Production in Relation to Need
- 6.2.1.2 To Protect Producer Livelihood
- 6.2.1.3 To Preserve of Rural Society and the Environment
- 6.2.1.4 To Encourage Development: R & D, Innovation, and New Industries
- 6.2.1.5 Political and Security Considerations
- 6.2.2 Rationale for Reducing or Ending Agricultural Subsidies in Light of the Right to Food
- 6.2.2.1 To Improve Market Function: Making Markets Fairer
- 6.2.2.2 To Promote the Efficient Use of Resources in Relation to Need
- 6.2.2.3 Capacity Needed for the Effective Use of Subsidies
- 6.2.2.4 Food aid
- 6.3 Subsidy Provisions Under the Agreement on Agriculture
- 6.3.1 Source of Commitments on Subsidies
- 6.3.2 Domestic Supports Provisions
- 6.3.2.1 Green Box and Other Measures Exempt from Commitments
- 6.3.2.2 Blue Box
- 6.3.2.3 Amber Box
- 6.3.2.4 Aggregate Measures of Support
- contradictions and complications
- 6.3.2.5 Proposed Amendments, Post-World Food Crisis
- 6.3.3 Export Subsidy Provisions
- 6.3.3.1 Export Subsidies Disguised as Aid and the Nairobi Package
- 6.4 Are the Elements of a Conflict of Norms Present Between the Right to Food and the Subsidies Provisions?
- 6.4.1 The Test of Joint Compliance
- 6.4.2 Test of Violation.
- 6.4.2.1 Does the Implementation of the World Trade Organization's Agriculture Rules Represent Retrogressive Measures?
- 6.4.2.2 The Effect of the Peace Clause
- 6.4.3 Revisiting the Indeterminacy of the Right to Food
- Human Rights as Counterweights to Trade Rules within the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
- 6.4.3.1 Evolutionary Interpretations of the Right to Food and Related Concepts in the WTO
- 6.4.3.2 Some Final Thoughts on the Concepts of Accumulation and Conflict
- 6.4.2.3 ICESCR Article 4: Limitations on the Right to food
- 6.5 Conclusion
- Locating Entryways for the Right to Food in wtoAgricultural Trade Rules
- Are Backdoor Exceptionsand Unilateral Conditions Enough to Transform theRelationship into one of Complementarity?
- 7.1 Introduction
- 7.2 The GATT Exceptions
- 7.2.1 Using GATT Article XX to Secure Respect for the Right to Food Extraterritorially
- 7.2.2 Are Human Rights Measure Necessary and the Least Trade Restrictive Options Available?
- 7.2.2.1 The Contested Applicability of GATT Article XX to Annexed Agreements
- 7.2.2.2 GATT Article XX in Recent Practice and the Case for Indigenous Peoplesʼ Livelhoods
- 7.2.3 GATT Article XXI
- 7.2.3.1 The Right to Food as a mere Exception
- 7.3 The Generalized System of Preferences
- 7.3.1 The GSP in the WTO
- 7.3.2 What do GSP Schemes Have to do with the Right to Food?
- 7.4 Transforming Agricultural Production and Trade
- 7.4.1 From Harmonious Interpretations to Promoting Genuine Complementarity
- 7.5 Conclusion
- Conclusion
- 8.1 Neither Conflict nor Compatibility
- 8.1.1 More Clarification, Stronger Legal Obligations, and Greater Accountability Needed for the Right to Food
- 8.1.2 A Clash of Values
- 8.2 Limitations of the Research and Looking Forward
- Bibliography
- Index.