Constitutional Law.

"This title was first published in 2000: This volume of essays explores a number of fundamental constitutional law questions in a variety of historical and jurisdictional contexts. The contributions focus on the role to be played by courts and legal principles in the resolution of major politic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Loveland, Ian D.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Milton : Taylor and Francis, 2018.
Colección:Routledge revivals.
Temas:
Constitutional law > Great Britain.
Droit constitutionnel > Grande-Bretagne.
Constitutional law
Great Britain
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Contents; Acknowledgements; Series Preface; Introduction; PART I: GENERAL PRINCIPLES; 1 Joseph Raz (1977), â#x80;#x98;The Rule of Law and its Virtueâ#x80;#x99;, Law Quarterly Review; 1. The Basic Idea; 2. Some Principles; 3. The Value of the Rule of Law; 4. The Rule of Law and its Essence; 5. Some Pitfalls; 2 Herbert Wechsler (1959), â#x80;#x98;Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Lawâ#x80;#x99;, Harvard Law Review, ; I. The Basis of Judicial Review; II. The Standards of Review; III. Some Appraisals of Review; PART II: ON SLAVERY.
  • 3 Edward S. Corwin (1911), â#x80;#x98;The Dred Scott Decision, in the Light of Contemporary Legal Doctrinesâ#x80;#x99;, American Historical Review4 William M. Wiecek (1974), â#x80;#x98;Somerset: Lord Mansfield and the Legitimacy of Slavery in the Anglo-American Worldâ#x80;#x99;, University of Chicago Law Review; i; II; Ill; IV; V; VI; VII; PART III: ON SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS PRIOR TO THEKEYNESIAN ORTHODOXY; 5 Roscoe Pound (1909), â#x80;#x98;Liberty of Contractâ#x80;#x99;, Yale Law Journal; 6 Harold J. Laski (1926), â#x80;#x98;Judicial Review of Social Policy in Englandâ#x80;#x99;, Harvard Law Review.
  • PART IV: ON THE LIBERTY OF THE PERSON IN TIME OF WAR7 Eugene V. Rostow (1945), â#x80;#x98;The Japanese American Cases
  • A Disasterâ#x80;#x99;, Yale LawJournal, ; I; II; Ill; IV; V; 8 R.F.V. Heuston (1970), â#x80;#x98;Liversidge v. Anderson in Retrospectâ#x80;#x99;, Law QuarterlyReview; PART V: THE SOUTH(ERN) AFRICAN CRISIS OF THE 1890s AND 1950s; 9 L.M. Thompson (1954), â#x80;#x98;Constitutionalism in the South African Republicsâ#x80;#x99;, Butterworths South African Law Review, ; INTRODUCTION; THE ORANGE FREE STATE8; THE SOUTH AFRICAN REPUBLIC; CONCLUSION.
  • 10 Denis V. Cowen (1953), â#x80;#x98;The Entrenched Sections of the South Africa Act: TwoGreat Legal Battlesâ#x80;#x99;, South African Law Journal, The Genesis of the Entrenched Sections; Rex V. Ndobe; The Vote Case; PART VI: CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THEUNITED KINGDOM PARLIAMENT; 11 H.W.R. Wade (1955), â#x80;#x98;The Basis of Legal Sovereigntyâ#x80;#x99;, Cambridge Law Journal; 12 P.P. Craig (1991), â#x80;#x98;Sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament after Factortame', Yearbook of European Law, ; I. Introduction; A. THE CONTENDING ARGUMENTS; B. THE CONTENDING ARGUMENTS: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES.
  • III. Sovereignty: reasons and conclusionsA. BLACKSTONE AND THE BALANCED CONSTITUTION; B. DICEY AND THE SELF-CORRECTING CONSTITUTION; C. AUSTIN AND THE ANALYTICAL ARGUMENT; IV. Sovereignty and the EEC; A. THE CASE-LAW PRIOR TO FACTORTAME; B.F AC TO RTAM E: THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND; C. THE FIRST FACTORTAM E CASE; D. THE SECOND FAC TO RTAM E CASE; V. Future implications; PART VII: CANADA: A VIA MEDIA BETWEEN BRITISH AND AMERICANPRINCIPLE?; 13 T.R.S. Allan (1986), â#x80;#x98;Law, Convention, Prerogative: Reflections Prompted by theCanadian Constitutional Caseâ#x80;#x99;, Cambridge Law Journal,

Ejemplares similares