Cargando…
Argumentation in the newsroom /
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam ; Philadelphia :
John Benjamins Publishing Company,
[2017]
|
| Colección: | Argumentation in context ;
v. 13. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro
- Argumentation in the Newsroom
- Editorial page
- Title page
- LCC data
- Epigraph
- Table of contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Acknowledgements
- 1. Newsmaking as an argumentative context
- 1.1 Newsroom decision-making
- 2. Newsmaking
- 2.1 Discourse analysis
- 2.2 Sociology
- 2.2.1 The gatekeeping theory
- 2.2.2 Newsmaking as routine work
- 2.3 Media linguistics
- 3. Argumentation theory
- 3.1 An overview of the discipline
- 3.2 Extended Pragma-Dialectics
- 3.3 On endoxa and enthymemes
- 3.4 The Argumentum Model of Topics
- 4. News values
- 4.1 News values: What we already know, and what still needs to be ascertained
- 4.2 News values as endoxa of newsmaking: A working hypothesis
- 5. Context
- 5.1 Studies on the context of argumentative practices
- 5.1.1 The pragma-dialectical notion of the activity type
- 5.1.2 The model of communication context
- 5.2 The argumentative dimension of activity types
- 5.3 The Swiss media landscape
- 5.3.1 The interaction field SRG SSR
- 5.3.1.1 Tagesschau
- 5.3.1.2 10vor10
- 5.3.1.3 Téléjournal
- 5.3.2 The interaction field Corriere del Ticino
- 6. Building a corpus
- 6.1 Progression Analysis
- 6.2 Corpus and data collection
- 6.3 Selecting cases for an argumentative analysis of newsroom practices: a rationale
- 6.3.1 Cases selected
- and now what?
- 7. Case studies
- 7.1 The editorial conference
- 7.1.1 Deliberative argumentative discussions in editorial conferences
- 7.1.2 Evaluative argumentative discussions in editorial conferences
- 7.1.3 Differences related to the medium
- 7.1.4 Broadcasting an item on a possible snowfall: The SNOW case
- 7.1.4.1 Should we broadcast an item on snow?
- 7.1.4.2 Subordinated issues
- 7.1.5 Choosing the front-page picture news: the LITF case.
- 7.1.6 Evaluating choices in a previous issue: the MALI case
- 7.1.7 Criticizing an established practice: the FORM case
- 7.2 The cutter-journalist discussion
- 7.2.1 Plane crash in Indonesia: the YOGI case
- 7.2.1.1 Who filmed the accident?
- 7.2.1.2 Are we allowed to say that this video was shot by a passenger?
- 7.2.1.3 Is the text "at risk of his life he switched on the camera" a journalistically adequate account of the event?
- 7.2.1.4 Is this video allowed by Téléjournal?
- 7.3 Collective decision-making and evaluation: What did we find out?
- 8. Case studies
- 8.1 Arguing with oneself in the literature
- 8.2 Annual results of BPS Suisse and UBS: the BANK case
- 8.2.1 Formulating a good title
- 8.2.2 Numbers are at the core of financial news
- 8.3 Irony as a means to convey a message indirectly: the RUMS case
- 8.4 Individual decision-making and evaluation: what did we find out?
- 9. Case studies
- 9.1 Editorials
- 9.2 Commenting on a speech by David Cameron: the CAME case
- 9.2.1 Cameron's argumentation
- 9.2.2 The journalist's argumentation
- 9.2.3 The journalist's reflection on his writing choices
- 9.2.3.1 The journalist arguing with himself
- live
- 9.3 Writing an editorial on a confused event: the RAID case
- 9.3.1 Israel seems to be best prepared to face a collapse of Al-Assad's regime
- 9.3.2 There is also a humanitarian red alert
- 9.3.3 The journalist's reflection on his writing choices
- 9.4 News products: what did we find out?
- 10. Findings and conclusions
- 10.1 Empirical findings
- 10.2 Results of the analysis
- 10.2.1 Rethinking gatekeeping and news values
- 10.2.2 Theoretical outcomes for argumentation theory
- 10.2.3 Newsmakers as an argumentative community
- 10.3 Coda: possible future development of the research
- 10.3.1 Designing argumentation in the newsroom.
- 10.3.2 Integrating argumentation in journalistic training
- References
- Subject index.