Cargando…
Alternative enforcement of competition law /
Competition authorities are known for imposing enormous fines on companies that have infringed the law. However, most authorities are equally active in educating, deliberating, influencing or preventing, to which end they have different enforcement instruments at their disposal. Imposing a fine thro...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Utrecht :
Eleven International,
2016.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Title page; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; CONTENTS; LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS; Part I INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT; Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION; 1. PRESENTATION OF THE RESEARCH TOPIC; 2. CONTEXT: DRIVERS OF CHANGE IN COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT; 2.1 Driver 1: Decentralisation; 2.1.1 Background of the Modernisation; 2.1.2 Interaction with Alternative Enforcement Practice; 2.2 Driver 2: Debate on the Goals of Competition Law; 2.2.1 Possible Goals of Competition Law; 2.2.2 Goals as a Driver of Alternative Enforcement; 2.3 Driver 3: Expectations of the 'Good Authority'
- 2.3.1 Effect on National Competition Authorities2.3.2 Expectations as a Driver of Alternative Enforcement; 3. DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVE ENFORCEMENT; 3.1 Alternatives to a Fully Adversarial Procedure; 3.2 Classification and Delineation; 4. RESEARCH QUESTION AND DELINEATION; 4.1 Research into National Enforcement Practice; 4.2 Relevance; 5. STRUCTURE OF THIS THESIS; Chapter 2 INSTITUTIONS AND LEGAL BACKGROUND; 1. INTRODUCTION; 2. THE NETHERLANDS; 2.1 Development of Competition Law and Enforcement; 2.2 Competition Law Enforcement by the ACM; 2.2.1 Institutional Set-Up and Accountability.
- 2.2.2 Tools, Output and Strategy2.3 Decision-Making Process and Legal Particularities; 3. FRANCE; 3.1 Development of Competition Law and Enforcement; 3.2 Competition Law Enforcement by the Autorité; 3.2.1 Institutional Set-Up and Accountability; 3.2.2 Tools, Output and Strategy; 3.3 Decision-Making Process and Legal Particularities; 4. UNITED KINGDOM; 4.1 Development of Competition Law and Enforcement; 4.2 Competition Law Enforcement by the UK CMA; 4.2.1 Institutional Set-Up and Accountability; 4.2.2 Tools, Output and Strategy; 4.3 Decision-Making Process and Legal Particularities.
- 5. FINAL REMARKSChapter 3 NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK; 1. INTRODUCING THE FRAMEWORK; 1.1 Factors Influencing the Normative Framework; 1.2 Functions of Public Economic Law; 1.3 Legitimacy as a Connecting Principle; 1.4 Presentation of the Framework; 1.5 Set-Up of the Chapter; 2. INSTRUMENTALITY; 2.1 Effectiveness; 2.1.1 Outcome Effectiveness; 2.1.2 Effectiveness as a Principle of Union Law; 2.1.3 Legal Approximation of Effectiveness; 2.1.4 Effective Enforcement; 2.2 Efficiency; 2.3 Flexibility; 3. SAFEGUARDS; 3.1 Legality; 3.2 Legal Certainty; 3.3 Proportionality; 3.4 Independence.
- 3.5 Accountability and Transparency3.6 Rights of Defence; 3.6.1 The Protection of Fundamental Rights in General; 3.6.2 Right to Be Heard; 3.6.3 Protection against Self-Incrimination; 3.6.4 Equality of Arms; 4. SYNTHESIS AND LEVELS OF ENFORCEMENT; 4.1 Instrumentality Requirements; 4.2 Safeguards; 4.3 Tensions between the Two and the Function of Legitimacy; 4.4 Interplay with Other Levels Relevant to Enforcement; 5. FINAL REMARKS; Part II NATIONAL PRACTICE AND COMPARISON; Chapter 4 NEGOTIATED PROCEDURES; 1. INTRODUCTION; 1.1 Negotiated Procedures on a European Level; 1.2 Delineation and Set-Up.