Cargando…

Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri /

In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of confli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Al-Azem, Talal (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2017]
Colección:Islamicate intellectual history.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000008i 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn959552374
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 160927t20172017ne ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2016044570 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c DLC  |d YDX  |d N$T  |d IDEBK  |d OCLCF  |d UAB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d EBLCP  |d IDB  |d ESU  |d U3W  |d OCLCO  |d AGLDB  |d G3B  |d IGB  |d STF  |d LEAUB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d UKSSU  |d CUV  |d INT  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 962447631  |a 962800699  |a 964400436 
020 |a 9789004323292  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9004323295  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9789004322837  |q (hardback) ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 9004322833  |q ((hardback) ;  |q alk. paper) 
035 |a (OCoLC)959552374  |z (OCoLC)962447631  |z (OCoLC)962800699  |z (OCoLC)964400436 
037 |a 4734086  |b Proquest Ebook Central 
042 |a pcc 
050 1 0 |a KBP440.43.I264 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 101000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 044000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 052000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 071000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 098000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 079000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 340.5/9  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Al-Azem, Talal,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition :  |b Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri /  |c by Talal Al-Azem. 
263 |a 1712 
264 1 |a Leiden ;  |a Boston :  |b Brill,  |c [2017] 
264 4 |c ©2017 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Islamicate Intellectual History ;  |v v. 2 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. 
505 0 |a ‎Contents; ‎Preface; ‎List of Figures; ‎Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; ‎Introduction; ‎Chapter 1. Authors; ‎1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; ‎1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; ‎2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; ‎2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; ‎Chapter 2. History; ‎1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; ‎2. Periodisation; ‎2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; ‎2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References] 
505 8 |a ‎2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]‎2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; ‎2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; ‎2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; ‎3. Historical Geographical Patterns; ‎4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); ‎Chapter 3. Theory; ‎1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; ‎2. Analysis of the Topics; ‎2.1. Definitions; ‎2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; ‎2.3. Judicial Discretion 
505 8 |a ‎3. Arguments for Binding Precedent‎3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; ‎3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; ‎3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; ‎3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; ‎3.5. The Argument from Predictability; ‎3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; ‎4. Historical Developments; ‎4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; ‎4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); ‎4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; ‎4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions 
505 8 |a ‎5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāya‎Chapter 4. Practice; ‎1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; ‎2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; ‎2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; ‎2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; ‎2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; ‎2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; ‎2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; ‎3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; ‎3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); ‎3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya) 
505 8 |a ‎3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic‎3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; ‎3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; ‎3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; ‎3.7. Justifications from Context; ‎3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; ‎3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; ‎3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; ‎4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; ‎5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; ‎Conclusion; ‎Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī 
520 |a In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
600 1 0 |a Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh,  |d 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475. 
600 1 0 |a Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad,  |d 972 or 973-1037.  |t Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. 
600 1 7 |a Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh,  |d 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475  |2 fast 
630 0 7 |a Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī (Qudūrī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad)  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Islamic law  |x Interpretation and construction. 
650 0 |a Hanafites. 
650 6 |a Droit islamique  |x Interprétation. 
650 6 |a Hanafites. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x General Practice.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Jurisprudence.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Paralegals & Paralegalism.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Practical Guides.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Hanafites  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Islamic law  |x Interpretation and construction  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Al-Azem, Talal.  |t Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition.  |d Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016]  |z 9789004322837  |w (DLC) 2016043463 
830 0 |a Islamicate intellectual history. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4734086  |z Texto completo 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL4734086 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1414519 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis36850281 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13259083 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP