Calling Power to Account : Law, Reparations, and the Chinese Canadian Head tax.
Calling Power to Account suggests that our legal systems can hope to play a part in responding to their own legacy of past injustice only when they recognize the full array of issues posed by the Head Tax Case.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Toronto :
University of Toronto Press,
2005.
|
Edición: | 2nd ed. |
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Context and History
- Mack v. Attorney General of Canada: Equality, History, and Reparation
- Litigating Injustice
- Legal Discrimination against the Chinese in Canada: The Historical Framework
- Can We Do Wrong to Strangers?
- The Head Tax Case and the Rule of Law: The Historical Thread of Judicial Resistance to 'Legalized' Discrimination
- Limits on Institutional Capacity to Address Injustice
- The Limits of Constitutionalism: Requiring Moral Behaviour from Government
- Delivering the Goods and the Good: Repairing Moral Wrongs
- Rights and Wrongs, Institutions and Time: Species of Historic Injustice and Their Modes of Redress
- Redress for Unjust State Action: An Equitable Approach to the Public/Private Distinction
- Legal Theory and Gross Statutory Injustice
- Gross Statutory Injustice and the Canadian Head Tax Case
- The Juristic Force of Injustice
- Private Right and Public Wrong
- The Timing of Injustice
- Mack v. Attorney General of Canada and the Structure of the Action in Unjust Enrichment
- A Brief History of Mass Restitution Litigation in the United States
- Time, Place, and Values: Mack and the Influence of the Charter on Private Law
- Appendix I: Appellants' Factum
- Appendix II: Mack v. Attorney General of Canada
- Judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal
- Index
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- W.