Cargando…

Expert Judgment in Project Management.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Szwed, Paul S.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Newtown Square, PA : Project Management Institute, 2016.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn954284806
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 160730s2016 pau o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d IDB  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d IDEBK  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
020 |a 9781628251463 
020 |a 1628251468 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000062695761 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043895089 
035 |a (OCoLC)954284806 
050 4 |a HD69.P75  |b .S994 2016eb 
082 0 4 |a 658.4/04  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Szwed, Paul S. 
245 1 0 |a Expert Judgment in Project Management. 
260 |a Newtown Square, PA :  |b Project Management Institute,  |c 2016. 
300 |a 1 online resource (95 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Title Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Background; 1.2. Problem Statement; 1.3. Objectives and Scope; 1.4. Methodology; 1.4.1. Phase 1; 1.4.2. Phase 2; 1.4.3. Phase 3; 1.5. Data Analysis; 1.6. Organization of Report; 2. State of the Art/Science; 2.1. Theory-Practice Gap; 2.2. Method; 2.3. Data and Sample; 2.4. Analysis and Results; 2.4.1. Planning the Elicitation; 2.4.2. Selecting the Experts; 2.4.3. Training Experts; 2.4.4. Eliciting Judgments; 2.4.5. Analyzing and Aggregating Judgments. 
505 8 |a 2.5. Findings and Implications3. State of the Practice; 3.1. Method; 3.2. Data and Sample; 3.3. Analysis and Results; 3.4. Limitations; 3.4.1. Population; 3.4.2. Sample Randomness; 3.4.3. Sample Size; 3.4.4. Self-Reported Data; 3.4.5. Scope of Study; 3.5. Findings and Implications; 4. Closing the Gap; 4.1. Critical Thinking Experiment; 4.1.1. Participants; 4.1.2. Protocol; 4.1.3. Method; 4.1.4. Results; 4.2. Numeracy and Fluency Experiment; 4.2.1. Participants; 4.2.2. Protocol; 4.2.3. Method; 4.2.4. Results; 4.3. Findings and Implications; 5. Discussion; 5.1. Summary; 5.2. Key Findings. 
505 8 |a 5.2.1. State of the Art/Science is Established and Growing5.2.2. State of the Practice in Project Management is Informal and Emergent; 5.2.3. Expert Judgment Elicitation in Project Management can Mature; 5.3. Suggested Practices; 5.3.1. Use a Generic Process; 5.3.2. Frame the Problem; 5.3.3. Plan the Elicitation; 5.3.4. Select Experts; 5.3.5. Train Experts; 5.3.6. Elicit Judgments Using Appropriate Methods; 5.3.7. Analyze Judgments and Combine (If Desired); 5.3.8. Document Results and Communicate; Appendix A; Appendix B; Appendix C; References. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Project management. 
650 0 |a Expertise. 
650 0 |a Specialists. 
650 6 |a Gestion de projet. 
650 6 |a Savoir-faire. 
650 6 |a Spécialistes. 
650 7 |a experts (qualified people)  |2 aat 
650 7 |a specialists.  |2 aat 
650 7 |a Expertise  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Project management  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Specialists  |2 fast 
758 |i has work:  |a Expert judgment in project management (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGYyBXCrjt68CtgKx9p4C3  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Szwed, Paul S.  |t Expert Judgment in Project Management: Narrowing the Theory-Practice Gap.  |d Newtown Square, PA : Project Management Institute, ©2016  |z 9781628251166 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4603817  |z Texto completo 
936 |a BATCHLOAD 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH40471437 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL4603817 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis37939738 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP