|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 4500 |
001 |
EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn954284806 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20240329122006.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr |n||||||||| |
008 |
160730s2016 pau o 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d OCLCQ
|d IDB
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d IDEBK
|d OCLCQ
|d MERUC
|d OCLCQ
|d K6U
|d OCLCO
|d UKAHL
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCL
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781628251463
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1628251468
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000062695761
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a DEBBG
|b BV043895089
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)954284806
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a HD69.P75
|b .S994 2016eb
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 658.4/04
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Szwed, Paul S.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Expert Judgment in Project Management.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Newtown Square, PA :
|b Project Management Institute,
|c 2016.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (95 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Title Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Background; 1.2. Problem Statement; 1.3. Objectives and Scope; 1.4. Methodology; 1.4.1. Phase 1; 1.4.2. Phase 2; 1.4.3. Phase 3; 1.5. Data Analysis; 1.6. Organization of Report; 2. State of the Art/Science; 2.1. Theory-Practice Gap; 2.2. Method; 2.3. Data and Sample; 2.4. Analysis and Results; 2.4.1. Planning the Elicitation; 2.4.2. Selecting the Experts; 2.4.3. Training Experts; 2.4.4. Eliciting Judgments; 2.4.5. Analyzing and Aggregating Judgments.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 2.5. Findings and Implications3. State of the Practice; 3.1. Method; 3.2. Data and Sample; 3.3. Analysis and Results; 3.4. Limitations; 3.4.1. Population; 3.4.2. Sample Randomness; 3.4.3. Sample Size; 3.4.4. Self-Reported Data; 3.4.5. Scope of Study; 3.5. Findings and Implications; 4. Closing the Gap; 4.1. Critical Thinking Experiment; 4.1.1. Participants; 4.1.2. Protocol; 4.1.3. Method; 4.1.4. Results; 4.2. Numeracy and Fluency Experiment; 4.2.1. Participants; 4.2.2. Protocol; 4.2.3. Method; 4.2.4. Results; 4.3. Findings and Implications; 5. Discussion; 5.1. Summary; 5.2. Key Findings.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 5.2.1. State of the Art/Science is Established and Growing5.2.2. State of the Practice in Project Management is Informal and Emergent; 5.2.3. Expert Judgment Elicitation in Project Management can Mature; 5.3. Suggested Practices; 5.3.1. Use a Generic Process; 5.3.2. Frame the Problem; 5.3.3. Plan the Elicitation; 5.3.4. Select Experts; 5.3.5. Train Experts; 5.3.6. Elicit Judgments Using Appropriate Methods; 5.3.7. Analyze Judgments and Combine (If Desired); 5.3.8. Document Results and Communicate; Appendix A; Appendix B; Appendix C; References.
|
590 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b Ebook Central Academic Complete
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Project management.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Expertise.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Specialists.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Gestion de projet.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Savoir-faire.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Spécialistes.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a experts (qualified people)
|2 aat
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a specialists.
|2 aat
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Expertise
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Project management
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Specialists
|2 fast
|
758 |
|
|
|i has work:
|a Expert judgment in project management (Text)
|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGYyBXCrjt68CtgKx9p4C3
|4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Szwed, Paul S.
|t Expert Judgment in Project Management: Narrowing the Theory-Practice Gap.
|d Newtown Square, PA : Project Management Institute, ©2016
|z 9781628251166
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4603817
|z Texto completo
|
936 |
|
|
|a BATCHLOAD
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH40471437
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBL - Ebook Library
|b EBLB
|n EBL4603817
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection
|b IDEB
|n cis37939738
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|