Cargando…
New asylum countries? : Migration control and refugee protection in an enlarged European Union.
How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU in conformity with international law in this area? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational op...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Leiden :
BRILL,
2002.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- TABLE OF CONTENTS; LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES; ABBREVIATIONS; INTRODUCTION; 1 WESTERN EUROPEAN ASYLUM POLICIES FOR EXPORT: THE TRANSFER OF PROTECTION AND DEFLECTION FORMULAS TO CENTRAL EUROPE AND THE BALTICS; 1.I: The EU Accession Process; 1.ll: Non-Admission and Non-Arrival Policies; 1. II. A: Various Types of Deflection of Asylum Seekers; 1.ll. B: Deflection Policies with a Particular Impact on Central European States; 1. II. C: Shifting Responsibility and Creating Safe Third Countries; 1.lll: Safe Third Country Practices; 1.lll. A: The Notion of a Safe Third Country.
- 1.lll. B: The Dublin Convention and EU Member States as Safe Third Countries1.lll. C: Harmonization and Safe Third Country Practices; 1.lll. D: Accession, Enlargement and Safe Third Country Practices; 1. IV: Reshuffling Protection Burdens; 2 THE CENTRAL LINK: GERMANY, POLAND AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC; 2.I: Germany; 2.I.A: Policy; 2.I.B: Practices; 2.I.C: Conclusion; 2. II: Poland; 2. II. 1 General Situation and Policy; 2. II. B: Changes in the Law; 2. II. C: Conclusions; 2. Ill: The Czech Republic; 2. III. A: Transit or Destination State?; 2. III. B: Legislative Practices; 2. III. C: Conclusion.
- 2. IV: Conclusions on the Central Link2. IV. A: The Proliferation of Strategies and Counter-Strategies; 2. IV. B: Numbers; 2. IV. C: The New Orbiters; 3 THE SOUTHERN LINK: AUSTRIA AND HUNGARY; 3.I: Austria; 3.I.A: Introduction; 3.I.B: Developments in Domestic Legislation; 3.I.C: Building a New Curtain; 3.I.D: Transposing the Acquis; 3.I.E: Austrian Policies Targeting Hungary; 3. II: Hungary; 3. II. A: Introduction: Notes on the History of Migratory Movements in Hungary; 3. II. B: Challenges Shaping Hungary's Role and Policy over the Last Decade; 3. II. C: The Challenge Posed by the EU.
- 3. II. D: The Practice in its Changing Form3. II. E: Conclusion; 3. Ill: Concluding Observations on the Southern Link; 4 THE NORTHERN LINK; 4.I Nordic Policy Responses to the Baltic Asylum Challenge; 4.I.A: Strategic Aspects of the Nordic-Baltic Relationship; 4.I.B: Political Self-Interests and Dependencies; 4.I.C: Cooperation and Coordination on Asylum and Migration Issues; 4.I.D: Protection vs. Exclusion as the Objective of Cooperation; 4. II: Lithuania; 4. II. A: Factors which Prompted Establishment of Asylum Systems; 4. II. B: Legislative Practice: Balancing Refugee Protection against Exclusion.
- 4. II. C: Policy Strategies4. Ill: Latvia; 4. III. A: Factors which Prompted Establishment of the Asylum System; 4. III. B: Legislative Practice: Balancing Refugee Protection against Exclusion; 4. III. C: Capacity Building; 4. IV: Estonia; 4. IV. A: Factors which Prompted the Establishment of Asylum Systems; 4. IV. B: Legislative Practices: Balancing Refugee Protection against Exclusion; 4. IV. C: Policy Strategies; 4.V: Concluding Observations on the Northern Link; 5 PROTECTION IN A SPIRIT OF SOLIDARITY?; 5.I: The Role of Burden-Sharing in the Enlargement Context; 5.I.A: The Objective of Burden-sharing.