EU environmental law, international environmental law, and human rights law : the case of environmental responsibility /
In EU Environmental Law, International Environmental Law, and Human Rights Law: The Case of Environmental Responsibility, Armelle Gouritin offers a critical appraisal of EU environmental responsibility law and asserts a new rights-based approach to international environmental law. This book addresse...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Leiden :
Brill, Nijhoff,
2016.
|
Colección: | International Environmental Law Ser.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Executive Summary
- Chapter 1 Introduction. Methodology, Terminology, Basic Concepts and Tensions
- 1.1 What: Subject, Questions, Thesis and Hypothesis
- 1.2 How: The Comparative Approach Applied in the Book. A Particular Focus on the Human Rights Approach
- 1.3 Introduction to Environmental Responsibility
- 1.4 Foundational Difficulties Encountered by the EU Legislator that are Addressed in the Book
- Chapter 2 International Environmental Law and Human Rights Partially Conflict but Mainly Confirm the Anthropocentric Conceptions of the Directives
- 2.1 Gaps in the Directives: Definition of Damage and Harm. The Anthropocentric and Regulatory Approaches
- 2.2 Gaps in the Directives: The Grounds for Responsibility. Limits of the Public and Regulatory Approach
- 2.3 International Environmental Law Partially Conflicts with the Directives: Natural Resources vs. Biodiversity
- 2.4 International Environmental Law and Human Rights Confirm the Directives through Policy Diffusion: Damage and Harm to Natural Resources
- 2.5 Conclusion
- Chapter 3 Conflict with Human Rights: Deference to the International Civil Liability Frameworks that Applies to Oil Spills in Directive 2004/35
- 3.1 Limited Scope of Application of the Directive: The Exclusions of Responsibility Mechanisms
- 3.2 Deference to International Law Conflicts with Human Rights: The Case of the Exclusion of Oil-spill Damage
- 3.3 Conclusion
- Chapter 4 Human Rights and Procedural Limitations in the Directives: Complement and Conflict
- 4.1 Gaps in the Directives that have a Procedural Dimension
- 4.2 Impartiality and Independence Requirements and the Discretion of Public Authorities: A Complement Case.
- 4.3 The Obligation to Guarantee Access to Environmental Information on Risk and the Boundaries of the Development Risk Defence: A Complement Case
- 4.4 Access to Justice and Prescription: A Conflict Case
- 4.5 Conclusion
- Chapter 5 Conclusions
- 5.1 The First Hypothesis is Verified: Gaps in Directives 2004/35 and 2008/99
- 5.2 The Second Hypothesis is Partially Verified: International Environmental Law and Council of Europe Human Rights Law as Limited Gaps-fillers. In between Complement, Confirmation and Conflict
- 5.3 The Thesis is Not Verified: The Comparative Approach does not Help to Depart from the Cost-allocation Paradigm
- 5.4 Taking Stock of the Results
- Annex-Summary of the Findings: Complement, Confirmation and Conflict
- Bibliography
- Academic Works
- Case Law (Chronological Order)
- Legal Texts (Chronological Order)
- Reports and Press Releases (Chronological Order)
- Index.