Tabla de Contenidos:
  • ""CURBING GRIDLOCK""; ""Copyright""; ""Preface""; ""Contents""; ""Contents""; ""Executive Summary""; ""BACKGROUND""; ""CONCLUSIONS ABOUT CONGESTION PRICING""; ""Congestion pricing would cause some motorists to change their behavior.""; ""Congestion pricing would result in a net benefit to society.""; ""Congestion pricing is technically feasible.""; ""Institutional issues are complex but can be resolved.""; ""All income groups can come out ahead given an appropriate distribution of revenues.""; ""Some motorists would lose.""; ""Congestion pricing would reduce air pollution and save energy.""
  • ""The political feasibility of congestion pricing is uncertain.""""Evaluation of early projects is crucial.""; ""An incremental approach is appropriate.""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""Federal Government""; ""Congress should extend the pilot program when ISTEA is reauthorized in 1997.""; ""Public officials (state, local, or regional depending on who has authority) should be given discretion regarding the use ofâ€?""; ""Congress should allow congestion pricing on urban Interstates or other federal-aid routes if called for in stateâ€?""
  • ""The federal government should provide additional incentives to encourage pricing on more than just single facilities byâ€?""""In cases where high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes on federal-aid facilities have clearly failed to induce ridesharing, or inâ€?""; ""Because of the unique opportunities offered by congestion pricing projects to learn about behavioral responses to variableâ€?""; ""Matching project development grants should be made available to local governments, states, toll authorities, andâ€?""
  • ""Federal law should treat the tax-exempt status of parking and transit subsidies equally and should require employers whoâ€?""""State and Local Governments""; ""State governments should adopt statutes similar to the California law that requires “cashing outâ€? employee parking.""; ""RESEARCH PRIORITIES""; ""1 Introduction""; ""IMPETUS FOR CONGESTION PRICING""; ""Congestion""; ""Efficiency""; ""Restrictions on Expanding Highway Capacity""; ""Advances in Technology""; ""Making the Automobile User Pay""; ""RESISTANCE TO CONGESTION PRICING""; ""OUTLINE OF REPORT""; ""REFERENCES""
  • ""ABBREVIATIONS""""2 Theory and Experience ""; ""THEORY""; ""APPLICATION""; ""EXPERIENCE""; ""Singapore""; ""France""; ""Hong Kong""; ""Norway""; ""Other Nations""; ""U.S. Proposals""; ""REFERENCES""; ""3 Possible Effects ""; ""IMPACT ON TRAVEL""; ""NET BENEFITS""; ""DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS""; ""COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC""; ""AIR QUALITY""; ""ENERGY""; ""URBAN FORM""; ""SUMMARY""; ""REFERENCES""; ""ABBREVIATIONS""; ""4 Technical and Political Feasibility ""; ""TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY""; ""Available Technologies""; ""Privacy""; ""Enforcement""; ""Administration""; ""POLITICAL FEASIBILITY""