Peer Review in Environmental Technology Programs.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Staff, National Research Council
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington : National Academies Press, 1998.
Colección:The compass series Peer review in environmental technology development programs
Temas:
Radioactive waste sites > Research > Evaluation > Technological innovations > United States > Cleanup.
Peer review > United States.
Évaluation par des pairs > États-Unis.
Peer review
United States
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs
  • Copyright
  • Preface
  • Contents
  • Executive Summary
  • DEFINITION OF PEER REVIEW
  • BENEFITS OF PEER REVIEW
  • Improving Technical Quality
  • Improving the Credibility of the Decision-Making Process
  • PEER REVIEW PROCESS
  • USES OF PEER REVIEW
  • ASSESSMENT OF OST'S PEER REVIEW PROGRAM
  • Linkage of Peer Reviews to Management Decisions
  • Selection of Projects for Review
  • Review Criteria
  • Selection of Reviewers
  • Documentation for Peer Reviews
  • Openness of Peer Reviews
  • REDUCING THE BACKLOGEVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT MECHANISMS
  • POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF PEER REVIEW WITHIN OST
  • OST'S ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND LEADERSHIP
  • 1 Introduction
  • OST'S PEER REVIEW PROGRAM
  • CHARGE TO THE COMMITTEE
  • PARALLEL EFFORTS
  • STUDY PROCESS
  • REPORTS
  • 2 Elements of a Credible Peer Review Program
  • DEFINITION OF PEER REVIEW
  • BENEFITS OF PEER REVIEW
  • Improving Technical Quality
  • Improving the Credibility of the Decision-Making Process
  • PEER REVIEW PROCESS
  • Selection of Projects to be Reviewed
  • Definition of Review Objectives and Selection of Review CriteriaSelection of Reviewers
  • Qualifications
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Planning and Conducting the Review
  • Confidentiality of Technical Information
  • Anonymous Versus Open Peer Reviews
  • Use of Peer Review Results in Decision Making
  • 3 Uses of Peer Review
  • PROPOSAL EVALUATIONS
  • PROJECT MATURITY EVALUATIONS
  • Entrance into the Applied Research Stage
  • Entrance into Engineering Development
  • Entrance into the Demonstration Stage
  • Predeployment Reviews
  • PROGRAM BALANCE EVALUATIONSNEEDS DETERMINATIONS
  • 4 OST's Peer Review Program
  • TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT DECISION MODEL
  • ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
  • Peer Review Coordinator
  • Headquarters Peer Review Program Manager
  • FA/CC Program Managers
  • Principal Investigators
  • American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • ASME Peer Review Committee and its Executive Panel
  • Peer Review Panels
  • Institute for Regulatory Science
  • SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGIES TO BE REVIEWED
  • DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR REVIEW
  • TYPES OF REVIEWS
  • SELECTION OF REVIEWERS
  • Selection CriteriaPanel Formation
  • Conflict of Interest
  • REVIEW CRITERIA
  • REVIEW SESSION
  • REVIEW REPORTS
  • FEEDBACK OF PEER REVIEW RESULTS INTO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS
  • 5 Analysis of OST's Peer Review Program
  • DEFINITION OF PEER REVIEW
  • BENEFITS OF PEER REVIEW
  • PEER REVIEW PROCESS
  • Selection of Projects for Peer Review
  • Prioritizing Projects for Review
  • Timing of Reviews
  • Grouping Projects in a Single Review
  • Definition of Peer Review Objectives and Selection of Review Criteria
  • Peer Review Objectives

Ejemplares similares