Cargando…

Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Staff, National Academy of Sciences
Otros Autores: Staff, National Academy of Engineering, Staff, Institute of Medicine
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington : National Academies Press, 1900.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mu 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn923261099
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 151010s1900 dcu o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d ZCU  |d ICG  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d LVT  |d DKC  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
020 |a 9780309586320 
020 |a 0309586321 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044106803 
035 |a (OCoLC)923261099 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a Q11.M24 
082 0 4 |a 507.9 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Staff, National Academy of Sciences. 
245 1 0 |a Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. 
260 |a Washington :  |b National Academies Press,  |c 1900. 
300 |a 1 online resource (176 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a ""MAJOR AWARD DECISIONMAKING AT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION""; ""Copyright""; ""Preface""; ""Contents""; ""Executive Summary""; ""BACKGROUND""; ""FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""Clear Rules of the Game""; ""Primacy of Technical Merit""; ""Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff""; ""Public Documentation of Decisionmaking""; ""More Stringent Setting of Priorities""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards""; ""Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning"" 
505 8 |a ""Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria""""Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion""; ""Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion""; ""Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process""; ""Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload""; ""Recommendation 8: Planning the Review Process and Criteria""; ""Recommendation 9: More and Better Public Documentation of Award Decisions""; ""Recommendation 10: More Recompetitions""; ""1 Major Awards at NSF ""; ""OVERVIEW OF MAJOR AWARDS""; ""MAJOR AWARDS AND MERIT REVIEW"" 
505 8 |a ""MAJOR AWARDS AND THE NSB""""NSF ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING FOR MERIT REVIEW""; ""OVERALL CONCLUSIONS""; ""Clear Rules of the Game""; ""Primacy of Technical Merit""; ""Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff""; ""Public Documentation of Decisionmaking""; ""More Stringent Setting of Priorities""; ""2 Planning Major Projects ""; ""BACKGROUND: PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING AT NSF""; ""Long-Range Planning at NSF""; ""Annual Budget Process""; ""MAJOR PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING""; ""Capital Facilities Planning""; ""FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING AND BUDGETING""; ""Findings"" 
505 8 |a ""Recommendations""""Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards""; ""Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning""; ""3 Awarding Major Projects: Criteria and Review Procedures ""; ""BACKGROUND: THE MERIT REVIEW PROCESS AT NSF""; ""Current Review Criteria""; ""Review and Selection Criteria for Major Project Awards""; ""Findings and Recommendations on Criteria""; ""Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria""; ""Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion"" 
505 8 |a ""Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion""""NSF PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING PROPOSALS""; ""Proposal Review Process""; ""Peer Review Modes""; ""Selection of Reviewers""; ""Policies and Procedures for Dealing with Bias and Conflict of Interest""; ""Award Decisionmaking""; ""Findings and Recommendations on Review Procedures""; ""Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process""; ""4 Awarding Major Projects: NSB Role, Review Process Design, and Decision Documentation ""; ""NSB ROLE AND PROCEDURES""; ""Findings and Recommendations on the NSB Role"" 
500 |a ""Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload"" 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
610 2 0 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.)  |x Awards. 
610 2 7 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.)  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Science  |x Awards  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Research grants  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Bourses de recherche  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a Awards  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Research grants  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Science  |x Awards  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq 
700 1 |a Staff, National Academy of Engineering. 
700 1 |a Staff, Institute of Medicine. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Staff, National Academy of Sciences.  |t Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation.  |d Washington : National Academies Press, ©1900  |z 9780309050296 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3376093  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL3376093 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP