|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mu 4500 |
001 |
EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn923261099 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20240329122006.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr |n||||||||| |
008 |
151010s1900 dcu o 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d OCLCQ
|d MERUC
|d OCLCQ
|d ZCU
|d ICG
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d LVT
|d DKC
|d AU@
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCL
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780309586320
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0309586321
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a DEBBG
|b BV044106803
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)923261099
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a Q11.M24
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 507.9
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Staff, National Academy of Sciences.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington :
|b National Academies Press,
|c 1900.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (176 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a ""MAJOR AWARD DECISIONMAKING AT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION""; ""Copyright""; ""Preface""; ""Contents""; ""Executive Summary""; ""BACKGROUND""; ""FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""Clear Rules of the Game""; ""Primacy of Technical Merit""; ""Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff""; ""Public Documentation of Decisionmaking""; ""More Stringent Setting of Priorities""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards""; ""Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning""
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a ""Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria""""Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion""; ""Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion""; ""Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process""; ""Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload""; ""Recommendation 8: Planning the Review Process and Criteria""; ""Recommendation 9: More and Better Public Documentation of Award Decisions""; ""Recommendation 10: More Recompetitions""; ""1 Major Awards at NSF ""; ""OVERVIEW OF MAJOR AWARDS""; ""MAJOR AWARDS AND MERIT REVIEW""
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a ""MAJOR AWARDS AND THE NSB""""NSF ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING FOR MERIT REVIEW""; ""OVERALL CONCLUSIONS""; ""Clear Rules of the Game""; ""Primacy of Technical Merit""; ""Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff""; ""Public Documentation of Decisionmaking""; ""More Stringent Setting of Priorities""; ""2 Planning Major Projects ""; ""BACKGROUND: PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING AT NSF""; ""Long-Range Planning at NSF""; ""Annual Budget Process""; ""MAJOR PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING""; ""Capital Facilities Planning""; ""FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING AND BUDGETING""; ""Findings""
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a ""Recommendations""""Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards""; ""Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning""; ""3 Awarding Major Projects: Criteria and Review Procedures ""; ""BACKGROUND: THE MERIT REVIEW PROCESS AT NSF""; ""Current Review Criteria""; ""Review and Selection Criteria for Major Project Awards""; ""Findings and Recommendations on Criteria""; ""Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria""; ""Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion""
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a ""Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion""""NSF PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING PROPOSALS""; ""Proposal Review Process""; ""Peer Review Modes""; ""Selection of Reviewers""; ""Policies and Procedures for Dealing with Bias and Conflict of Interest""; ""Award Decisionmaking""; ""Findings and Recommendations on Review Procedures""; ""Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process""; ""4 Awarding Major Projects: NSB Role, Review Process Design, and Decision Documentation ""; ""NSB ROLE AND PROCEDURES""; ""Findings and Recommendations on the NSB Role""
|
500 |
|
|
|a ""Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload""
|
590 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b Ebook Central Academic Complete
|
610 |
2 |
0 |
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.)
|x Awards.
|
610 |
2 |
7 |
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.)
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Science
|x Awards
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Research grants
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Bourses de recherche
|z États-Unis.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Awards
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Research grants
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Science
|x Awards
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Staff, National Academy of Engineering.
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Staff, Institute of Medicine.
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Staff, National Academy of Sciences.
|t Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation.
|d Washington : National Academies Press, ©1900
|z 9780309050296
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3376093
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL3376093
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|