Cargando…
Condition assessment for wastewater pipelines : synthesis report /
The research results presented in this report were compiled to provide a clearer understanding of the state of the technology for wastewater pipeline condition assessment methodologies and technologies, focusing primarily on the geographic regions of the U.S.A. An extensive literature review was per...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Alexandria, VA : London :
WERF ; IWA Publishing,
2013.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Copyright; Acknowledgments; Abstract and Benefits; Table of Contents; List of Tables; List of Figures; List of Abbreviations and Acronyms; Executive Summary; Chapter 1.0: Introduction; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Water Infrastructure Database (WATERiD); 1.3 Condition Assessment of Wastewater Pipelines; 1.4 Methodology Overview; 1.5 Synthesis Report Objectives; Chapter 2.0: Analysis and Synthesis of Literature and Practice; 2.1 Analysis and Synthesis; 2.2 Definition of Condition Assessment; 2.3 Technology Use; 2.3.1 Analysis of Pipe Characteristics
- 2.3.2 Analysis of Condition Assessment Techniques Used2.3.3 QA/QC; 2.3.4 Geographical Trends; 2.4 Practices Related to Condition Assessment; 2.4.1 Drivers for Condition Assessment Technique Selection; 2.4.2 Data Management; 2.5 Cost; 2.6 Gaps Between Needs and Available Technologies; 2.7 Key Lessons and Tips for Success; Chapter 3.0: Recommendations and Standard Data Structure; 3.1 Proposed Standard Data Structure; 3.2 Need for Standard Data Structure; 3.3 Proposed Data Structure Parameters; 3.3.1 Utility Name; 3.3.2 Utility Location; 3.3.3 Utility Population Served
- 3.3.4 Project Location Description3.3.5 Project Start Date and Project End Date; 3.3.6 Total Project Cost; 3.3.7 Pipeline Material; 3.3.8 Pipeline Internal Diameter; 3.3.9 Pipeline Installation Year; 3.3.10 Pipeline Length; 3.3.11 Pipeline Type; 3.3.12 Consultant; 3.3.13 Contractor; 3.3.14 Technology Vendor; 3.3.15 Technology Used; 3.3.16 Product Used; 3.3.17 Defects Found; 3.3.18 Known Environmental Characteristics; 3.3.19 Success of Project; 3.3.20 Comments; 3.4 Benefits of Use of the Standard Data Structure; 3.4.1 Usefulness at Different Managerial Levels within a Utility
- 3.4.2 Usefulness for Detecting Broad TrendsChapter 4.0: Conclusions and Recommendations; 4.1 Conclusions; 4.2 Recommendations and Future Work; Appendix A: Pipeline Condition Assessment; Appendix B: State-of-the-Art Literature Review; Appendix C: State-of-the-Art Practice Review; Appendix D: Technological and Geographical Utility Practice Data Gap Analysis; Appendix E: Example of a Technology Profile in WATERiD; Appendix F: Example Technology Data Sheet; Appendix G: Example Case Study; Appendix H: Table of Reports and Literature Sources Reviewed; References