Cargando…

Taxpayer participation in tax treaty dispute resolution /

"When taxpayers go global, can disputes and dispute resolution remain local? Unilateral administrative measures and domestic judicial systems will continue to be used for the resolution of international tax disputes, but the inherent limits of one-sided solutions to multi-sided problems are bou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Perrou, Katerina (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: [Amsterdam, The Netherlands] IBFD, 2014.
Colección:IBFD Doctoral Series vol. 28
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn909315775
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |nu---auuuu
008 150519t20142015ne ob 000 0 eng
040 |a AU@  |b eng  |e rda  |c AU@  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d YDX  |d OCLCA  |d DIBIB  |d OCLCO  |d N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 1259284177 
020 |a 9087222262 
020 |a 9789087222260  |q (electronic bk.) 
029 0 |a AU@  |b 000054780673 
035 |a (OCoLC)909315775  |z (OCoLC)1259284177 
050 4 |a K4475 
082 0 4 |a 343.0526  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Perrou, Katerina,  |e author.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Taxpayer participation in tax treaty dispute resolution /  |c Katerina Perrou. 
264 1 |a [Amsterdam, The Netherlands]  |b IBFD,  |c 2014. 
264 4 |c ©2015 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a IBFD Doctoral Series  |v vol. 28 
500 |a Part of the IBFD tax research platform. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
505 0 |a International tax dispute resolution: past, present and future -- Diplomatic protection and international tax disputes: an awkward cohabitation of two strangers -- International double taxation disputes as disputes between the State(s) and the taxpayer(s) -- A comparative perspective: private parties in international law disputes -- "Access to an effective remedy" and international tax disputes -- the creation of positive obligations for the States -- "Access" to an "effective remedy": the Domestic Courts option -- "Access" to an "effective remedy": the international route -- Direct taxpayer access to international tax dispute resolution mechanisms -- Redesigning the international tax dispute resolution mechanism -- Taxpayer participation in DTC dispute resolution in a nutshell. 
520 |a "When taxpayers go global, can disputes and dispute resolution remain local? Unilateral administrative measures and domestic judicial systems will continue to be used for the resolution of international tax disputes, but the inherent limits of one-sided solutions to multi-sided problems are bound to lead us to unsatisfactory results. Closer international cooperation becomes a sine qua non for the establishment of an international dispute resolution system that will possess all the fair trial guarantees of domestic judicial systems, but also cure its limited effectiveness, which does not extend beyond the geographical borders of one state. The striking discrepancy between domestic judicial systems and the international one (MAP and arbitration) is the phenomenon of the absent taxpayer. This may be explained, but at the current level of development of international (economic) law and human rights law it can no longer be justified. This analysis develops on two axes: (i) the access of private parties to international law remedies from the perspective of public international law; and (ii) the access of private parties to international law remedies from a human rights law perspective. A comparative analysis reveals that MAP as a form of diplomatic protection is not appropriate for international tax disputes. On the other hand, traditional public international law doctrine prohibiting the participation of private parties in international dispute resolution mechanisms has progressively shrunk. At the same time, prohibiting taxpayers direct access to MAP and arbitration procedures renders the tax treaty dispute resolution mechanism not compatible with the fair trial guarantees. 
520 8 |a "The study concludes that certain amendments to the current MAP and arbitration procedures are required: the proposed enhanced dispute resolution system should provide for (i) direct taxpayer participation; (ii) functional multiparty proceedings; and (iii) administrative procedures (MAP) followed by judicial ones (arbitration)."--Extracted from the publisher website on May 19, 2015. 
588 |a Title from title screen, current to 30 August 2013 (viewed on May 19, 2015) 
546 |a English. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Double taxation  |x Treaties. 
650 0 |a Arbitration (International law) 
650 0 |a Dispute resolution (Law) 
650 6 |a Double imposition  |x Traités. 
650 6 |a Règlement de conflits. 
650 7 |a Arbitration (International law)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Dispute resolution (Law)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Double taxation  |2 fast 
655 0 |a Electronic books. 
655 7 |a Treaties  |2 fast 
710 2 |a International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation,  |e publisher.  |4 pbl 
758 |i has work:  |a Taxpayer participation in tax treaty dispute resolution (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFBmcPh7qQmkD7yxxF7Rw3  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Perrou, Katerina  |t Taxpayer participation in tax treaty dispute resolution  |z 9789087222253  |w (OCoLC)876706232 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=30459277  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL30459277 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 14695099 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1553359 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP