Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Being polite is an effective way to facilitate interpersonal communication. One of the key issues is how the human cognitive system perceives verbal politeness and deals with the cases in which politeness principles are violated. By using event-related potentials (ERPs), we aim to address the nature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Terkourafi, Marina (Editor ), Defibaugh, Staci (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam ; Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015]
Colección:AILA applied linguistics series ; v. 14.
Temas:
Politeness (Linguistics)
Interpersonal communication.
Interpersonal relations.
Interdisciplinary approach in education.
Perspective (Linguistics)
Formules de politesse.
Communication interpersonnelle.
Interdisciplinarité en éducation.
Focus (Linguistique)
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Public Policy > Cultural Policy.
SOCIAL SCIENCE > Anthropology > Cultural.
SOCIAL SCIENCE > Popular Culture.
Interdisciplinary approach in education
Interpersonal communication
Interpersonal relations
Linguistik
Höflichkeit
Unhöflichkeit
Sprache
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness
  • Editorial page
  • Title page
  • LCC data
  • Table of contents
  • Introduction. Bridging theory and practice in im/politenessresearch
  • Part I. Self-reporting Studies
  • Introduction to Part I
  • References
  • Social deixis in motion
  • 1. Address terms: Social and pragmatic aspects of use
  • 2. Evolving address paradigms
  • 2.1 Russian
  • 2.2 Mandarin Chinese
  • 2.3 The failure of COMRADE as a social deictic
  • 2.4 Interim summary
  • 3. An empirical study of current means of formal address in Mandarin Chinese and Russian
  • 3.1 Elicited production task (Russian, Mandarin Chinese)
  • 3.2 Results
  • 3.2.1 Russian
  • 3.2.2 Mandarin Chinese
  • 3.3 Interim discussion
  • 3.4 Lexical and deictic functions of the token comrade: An acceptability judgment task and a follow-up questionnaire
  • 3.5 Acceptability judgment task (Russian): Results
  • 3.6 Follow up questionnaire (Mandarin Chinese): Results
  • 4. Discussion
  • 5. Conclusion
  • Etymological dictionaries of Russian:
  • Appendix 1
  • Appendix 2
  • The M-word
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Theoretical background
  • 2.1 The Banter principle and proposed extensions
  • 2.2 Types of implicature involved in banter
  • 3. The study: Metalinguistic judgments about re malaka
  • 3.1 Participants
  • 3.2 Materials and procedure
  • 3.3 Results
  • 3.3.1 Insulting vs. solidary senses
  • 3.3.2 Types of addressees
  • 3.3.3 Self-reported usage
  • 4. Discussion
  • References
  • Appendix
  • "There's not a lot of negotiation"
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Research questions
  • 3. Methods of data collection
  • 4. Results
  • 4.1 Classroom observations
  • 4.2 Focus group interviews
  • 4.2.1 Faculty focus groups participants' responses: Female faculty
  • 4.2.2 The second focus group: Male faculty
  • 4.2.3 Undergraduate focus groups
  • 4.2.4 Graduate student responses.
  • 5. Implications-applications
  • 6. Conclusion
  • References
  • Part II. Observational Studies
  • Introduction to Part II
  • References
  • Korean honorifics beyond politeness markers
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Korean honorifics
  • 3. Politeness and honorifics
  • 3.1 Honorifics as a negative politeness strategy
  • 3.2 Honorifics and speech style shifting
  • 3.3 Frame, footing, and honorifics
  • 4. Data
  • 5. Changing footing through speech style shift
  • 5.1 From public to private stance
  • 5.2 From onstage to offstage stance
  • 5.3 From serious to joking stance
  • 5.4 From conversational to soliloquizing stance
  • 5.5 From main storyteller to commentator stance
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Goading as a social action
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1 Impoliteness
  • 1.2 On using CA as an informing tool
  • 2. Email data collection
  • 2.1 The participants
  • 2.2 Short message email data
  • 2.3 Follow-up interviews
  • 2.4 Problems with quantifying response speed in email data
  • 2.5 Adjustment of data
  • 3. Goading
  • 3.1 Goadables
  • 3.2 Claim of being teased as a sanctionable
  • 3.3 Goading as solidarity work
  • 3.4 Goading displaying preference for alignment
  • 3.5 Threat-like syntax treated as a goadable
  • 3.6 Disalignment with goading
  • 4. Discussion and conclusion
  • References
  • Shaming, group face, and identity construction in a Russian virtual community for women
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1 Data collection and demographics
  • 1.2 Gender in the post-Soviet space
  • 1.3 A short overview of communal shaming
  • 2. Confessions, shaming, and support
  • 3. Mutual shaming
  • 4. Conclusions
  • References
  • Part III. Experimental Studies
  • Introduction to Part III
  • References
  • Interactional competence and politeness
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Review of literature
  • 2.1 Perception in politeness research.
  • 2.2 Development of interactional competence
  • 2.3 Collaborative talk
  • 3. The study
  • 4. Methods
  • 4.1 Participants
  • 4.2 Creation of experimental dialogue
  • 4.3 Instrument
  • 4.4 Procedure
  • 4.5 Coding and analysis
  • 5. Results
  • 6. Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix: Scenarios
  • Using eye-tracking to examine the reading of texts containing taboo words
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1 Eye-tracking methodology
  • 1.2 Cognition and taboo words
  • 1.3 Empirical research on (im)politeness
  • 2. Current study
  • 2.1 Participants
  • 2.2 Materials
  • 2.3 Procedure
  • 3. Results and discussion
  • 4. General discussion, conclusions and suggestions for future research
  • References
  • Appendix A: Three further examples of stimuli materials
  • Appendix B: Full list of taboo and non-taboo exclamations used in the study
  • Impoliteness electrified
  • 1. Impoliteness processing: Theoretical debates
  • 1.1 Respectful address in Mandarin Chinese
  • 1.2 (Im)politeness theories in debate
  • 2. Offline behavioral evidence on politeness processing and impoliteness processing
  • 3. Neuro-cognitive evidence on honorific processing
  • 4. Electrophysiological studies on processing disrespectful reference in Mandarin
  • 4.1 Overview of study design
  • 4.2 Hypothesis of ERP responses
  • 4.3 Materials generation
  • 4.4 Experimental procedure
  • 4.5 EEG recording, analysis and brain potentials of interest
  • 4.6 Eliciting disrespectfulness in referential expression using a simple scenario?
  • 4.7 Dealing with the violation of respectful constraints: A syntactic or semantic/pragmatic mechanism?
  • 4.8 Inter-individual differences in perceiving disrespectful reference?
  • 4.8.1 Gender effects
  • 4.8.2 Impact of the interpersonal reactive ability (fantasizing ability)
  • Acknowledgement
  • References.
  • Epilogue : The "How" and the "What" of (Im)politeness
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The "how"
  • 3. The "what"
  • 4. Concluding remarks
  • References
  • Index.

Ejemplares similares