Cargando…
A nascent common law : the process of decisionmaking in international legal disputes between states and foreign investors /
In A Nascent Common Law, Frédéric Gilles Sourgens offers an account of the theoretical underpinnings of investor-state arbitration, a key growth field of international and transnational law.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Leiden, The Netherlands :
Koninklijke Brill,
2015.
|
| Colección: | International litigation in practice ;
Volume 9. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Preface; Table of Cases; Part 1 The Framework of Investor-State Arbitration; Chapter 1 Critical Mass: The Unique Role of Investor-State Arbitration in International Law; 1.1 Quantitative Explanation; 1.2 Qualitative Explanation; 1.3 Functional Explanation; 1.4 Consequence of Doctrinal Divergence; 1.5 Method; Chapter 2 Theoretical Underpinnings of the Adjudicatory Framework; 2.1 Beneath the Contract Law Analogy; 2.1.1 The Imperfections of the Contract Law Analogy; 2.1.2 The Virtues of the Contract Law Analogy; 2.2 Beneath the Treaty Analogy.
- 2.2.1 The Imperfections of the Treaty Analogy2.2.2 The Virtues of the Treaty Analogy; 2.3 Reconstructing Investor-State Arbitration through Unilateral Acts; Chapter 3 Stability of the Adjudicatory Framework; 3.1 The Offer and Acceptance Analogy and Denunciation of the ICSID Convention; 3.2 The Offer and Acceptance Analogy and the Termination of Standing Consent Instruments; 3.3 Denunciation and Modification under the Treaty Analogy; 3.4 Denunciation and Modification of Consents to Arbitration under the Unilateral Act Model; 3.5 Implications for the Process of Decisionmaking.
- Chapter 4 Iura Novit Curia4.1 Beneath Iura Novit Curia; 4.1.1 The Problems of Applying Iura Novit Curia in Investor-State Arbitration; 4.1.2 The Virtues of Iura Novit Curia; 4.2 Beneath the Terms of Reference; 4.2.1 The Problems of Limiting Applicable Law to the Pleadings; 4.2.2 The Virtues of Limiting Applicable Law to the Pleadings; 4.3 Reconstructing Iura Novit Curia as Urteilskraft; Part 2 Establishing Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration; Chapter 5 The Problem of Jurisdictional Judgment; 5.1 Burdens of Proof and Persuasion in Establishing Jurisdiction.
- 5.1.1 Existence and Scope of Consent5.1.2 Jurisdictional Facts; 5.2 The Shortcomings of Use of Burdens of Proof and Persuasion in the Jurisdictional Context; 5.3 Ex Officio Establishment of Jurisdiction; 5.4 The Shortcomings of Jurisdictional Decisionmaking Ex Officio; 5.5 Preliminary Reconciliation; Chapter 6 Proof of Consent; 6.1 The Function of Jurisdiction in International Law-Factory at Chorzów; 6.2 Application of the Factory at Chorzów Approach in Investor-State Arbitrations; 6.3 The Process of Jurisdictional Proof of Consent in Investor-State Arbitration.
- 6.4 Investor Reliance and Interpretation of Consent Instruments6.5 Clarity Presumptions are Inconsistent with the Factory at Chorzów Approach; 6.6 Reevaluating Jurisdictional Decisions in Light of the Proof of Law; Chapter 7 Establishment of Jurisdictional Facts; 7.1 A Level Playing Field-Proof of Jurisdictional Facts Before the International Court of Justice; 7.2 The Practice of Investment Tribunals; 7.3 De Facto Burdens of Production; 7.4 Burden of Production and Factual Presumptions; 7.5 Dispositive Use of Burdens Revisited; Chapter 8 The Inductive Process of Jurisdictional Decisionmaking.