The management of scientific integrity within academic medical centers /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

The Management of Scientific Integrity within Academic Medical Centers discusses the impact scientific misconduct has in eight complex case studies. Authors look at multifaceted mixtures of improper behavior, poor communication, cultural issues, adverse medical/health issues, interpersonal problems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: Snyder, Peter J., 1964- (Autor), Mayes, Linda C. (Autor), Smith, William E. (William Edward), 1959- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam : Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier, [2015]
Temas:
United States. > Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. > Office of Research Integrity.
United States. > Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. > Office of Research Integrity
Medicine > Research > Corrupt practices.
Academic medical centers > Corrupt practices.
Medicine > Research > Moral and ethical aspects.
Fraud in science.
Academic medical centers.
Scientific Misconduct
Academic Medical Centers
Biomedical Research > ethics
Case Reports
Science > ethics
Médecine > Recherche > Pratiques déloyales.
Centres hospitaliers universitaires > Pratiques déloyales.
Médecine > Recherche > Aspect moral.
Fraude scientifique.
Centres hospitaliers universitaires.
MEDICAL > Research.
Fraud in science
Academic medical centers
Medicine > Research > Corrupt practices
Medicine > Research > Moral and ethical aspects
Case studies
Case studies.
Études de cas.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Front Cover; The Management of Scientific Integrity within Academic Medical Centers; Copyright; DEDICATIONS; CONTENTS; FOREWORD; ABOUT THE AUTHORS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; Chapter 1
  • Introduction: Research Misconduct in Biomedical Research Institutions; REFERENCES; Chapter 2
  • Research Integrity: The Legal and Regulatory Landscape; 1. INTRODUCTION; 2. THE INSTITUTIONAL AND AGENCY PROCESS; 3. OTHER LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR RESEARCHERS ENGAGING IN RESEARCH MISCONDUCT; 4. PROCESS-BASED CHALLENGES; 5. OTHER TYPES OF CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF INSTITUTIONAL PROCEEDINGS; 6. LITIGATION OVER RECORDS; END NOTES.
  • Part I
  • CASE STUDIESA NOTE ON THE PRESENTATION OF NINE RESEARCH INTEGRITY CASE STUDIES; Chapter 3
  • Question of Data Manipulation in Failure to Replicate Findings in Published Manuscript; 1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT; 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY; 3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 6. RESOLUTION; 7. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCES; Chapter 4
  • Violation of Institutional and Public Health Service Policies Governing the Care and Use of Animals in Research: Cultural Barriers in the Academic Workplace; 1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT.
  • 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 6. RESOLUTION; 7. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCE; Chapter 5
  • Research Assistants Coming Forward with Concerns about Perceived Behavior of Principal Investigator; 1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT; 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY; 3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 6. RESOLUTION; 7. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCES; Chapter 6
  • Questionable Mentorship and Oversight of Federal Grant Funding.
  • 1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY; 3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 6. RESOLUTION; 7. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCE; Chapter 7
  • Submission of Fraudulent Data to a Peer-Review Journal: What Is the Role of the Lab Head/Mentor?; 1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT; 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY; 3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. INTERVIEW WITH DR ALATAS; 6. INTERVIEW WITH DR PERKASA; 7. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 8. RESOLUTION; 9. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCES.
  • Chapter 8
  • Plagiarism versus Data Shared between Junior and Senior Investigators1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT; 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY; 3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 6. RESOLUTION; 7. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCES; Chapter 9
  • Misappropriation and Use of Data from a Multisite and Multi-investigator Study; 1. PRESENTING COMPLAINT; 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY; 3. RELEVANT EVIDENCE; 4. CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADJUDICATION; 5. SYNTHESIS AND FORMULATION; 6. RESOLUTION; 7. COMMENTARY; QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION; REFERENCES.
  • Chapter 10
  • Determining the Extent of Data Fabrication Following an Apparent Single Incident.

Ejemplares similares