Cargando…
The National Courts'' Mandate in the European Constitution.
The reform of the European Constitution continues to dominate news headlines and has provoked a massive debate, unprecedented in the history of EU law. Against this backdrop Monica Claes'' book offers a ""bottom up"" view of how the Constitution might work, taking the v...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
London :
Bloomsbury Publishing,
2006.
|
| Colección: | Modern studies in European law.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Half Title Page; Half Title verso; Title Page; Title verso; Acknowledgements; Contents; Table of Cases; Introduction: The Judge, his Mandate, the National Constitution and European Union Law; I. Setting the Stage; II. The Theoretical Framework; Part 1: The National Courts as Common Courts of European Law; 1. Introduction; 2. Before the West was Won: A Touch of Legal Archaeology; 2.1. THE GENERAL PICTURE; 2.2. THE NETHERLANDS; 2.3. FRANCE; 2.4. BELGIUM; 2.5. LUXEMBOURG; 2.6. GERMANY; 2.7. ITALY; 2.8. CONCLUSION; 3. The Creation of a Community Mandate for National Courts.
- 3.1. INTRODUCTION: NATIONAL COURTS AS COMMUNITY COURTS3.2. HINTS OF A ROLE FOR NATIONAL COURTS IN THE TREATIES; 3.3. THE COMMUNITY MANDATE OF THE NATIONAL COURTS; 4. The Duty to Review National Law: the ''Simmenthal Mandate''; 4.1. THE DOCTRINE OF DIRECT EFFECT; 4.2. THE DOCTRINE OF SUPREMACY; 4.3. DIRECT EFFECT AND SUPREMACY: THE 'SIMMENTHAL MANDATE'; 4.4. SUPREMACY BEYOND DIRECT EFFECT?; 4.5. CONCLUSION; 5. Refining the Mandate: Second Generation Issues; 5.1. THE PRINCIPLE OF PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY; 5.2. FROM A 'PRINCIPLE' OF STRUCTURAL SUPREMACY TO THE PRINCIPLE OF FULL EFFECTIVENESS.
- 5.3. THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION5.4. THE REQUIREMENT OF UNIFORM APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW; 5.5. INTERMEDIATE CONCLUDING REMARKS; 5.6. CHANGING THE PERSPECTIVE: THE CREATION OF NEW REMEDIES; 6. The ''Simmenthal Mandate'' Embraced; 6.1. INTRODUCTION; 6.2. GRADUAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE DUTY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW BY THE DOMESTIC COURTS: A BIRD'S EYE VIEW; 6.3 FINAL REMARKS; 7. About Legal Orders; 7.1. INTRODUCTION; 7.2. THE CLASSIC DICHOTOMY: MONISM AND DUALISM; 7.3. WHAT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY LAW: IN SEARCH OF A DOCTRINAL BASIS.
- 7.4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND NATIONAL LEGAL ORDER IN THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE7.6. DEFINING THE COMMUNITY LEGAL ORDER FROM THE NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; 7.7. CLOSING REMARKS; 8. The Constitutional Limits of the Judicial Function; 8.1. THE PLACE OF THE COURTS IN THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM; 8.2. THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE; 8.3. THE NATIONAL ANSWER; 9. Explaining Acceptance; 9.1. 'LEGALIST' EXPLANATIONS; 9.2. JUDICIAL DIALOGUE; 9.3. THE WIDER CONTEXT: NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON TREATIES.
- 9.4. THE WIDER CONTEXT: THE GENERAL INCREASEOF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW9.5. THE EMPOWERMENT THESIS; 9.6. THE INTER-COURT COMPETITION ARGUMENT; 9.7. CROSS-FERTILISATION; 9.8. NATIONAL LEGAL CULTURES; 9.9. LA DOCTRINE AND PERSONALITIES ON THE BENCH ... ; 9.10. ... AND BEYOND; 9.11. THE CASES AT HAND; 9.12. THE PROPORTION OF COMMUNITY LAW CASES IN DOMESTIC PROCEEDINGS; 9.13. FINAL REMARKS; 10. Excursion: The ''Costanzo Mandate'' of Administrative Authorities; 11. The ''Francovish Mandate'': Jurisdiction to Hold the State Liable for Breach of Community Law; 11.1. INTRODUCTION.