|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mu 4500 |
001 |
EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn893332224 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20240329122006.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr |n||||||||| |
008 |
141018s2006 enk o 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d OCLCO
|d DEBSZ
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCL
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781847312181
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1847312187
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a DEBSZ
|b 431756368
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000062568886
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)893332224
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a KJE3666 .C55 2014
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 342.24
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Claes, Monica.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The National Courts'' Mandate in the European Constitution.
|
260 |
|
|
|a London :
|b Bloomsbury Publishing,
|c 2006.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (818 pages).
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Modern Studies in European Law
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Half Title Page; Half Title verso; Title Page; Title verso; Acknowledgements; Contents; Table of Cases; Introduction: The Judge, his Mandate, the National Constitution and European Union Law; I. Setting the Stage; II. The Theoretical Framework; Part 1: The National Courts as Common Courts of European Law; 1. Introduction; 2. Before the West was Won: A Touch of Legal Archaeology; 2.1. THE GENERAL PICTURE; 2.2. THE NETHERLANDS; 2.3. FRANCE; 2.4. BELGIUM; 2.5. LUXEMBOURG; 2.6. GERMANY; 2.7. ITALY; 2.8. CONCLUSION; 3. The Creation of a Community Mandate for National Courts.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 3.1. INTRODUCTION: NATIONAL COURTS AS COMMUNITY COURTS3.2. HINTS OF A ROLE FOR NATIONAL COURTS IN THE TREATIES; 3.3. THE COMMUNITY MANDATE OF THE NATIONAL COURTS; 4. The Duty to Review National Law: the ''Simmenthal Mandate''; 4.1. THE DOCTRINE OF DIRECT EFFECT; 4.2. THE DOCTRINE OF SUPREMACY; 4.3. DIRECT EFFECT AND SUPREMACY: THE 'SIMMENTHAL MANDATE'; 4.4. SUPREMACY BEYOND DIRECT EFFECT?; 4.5. CONCLUSION; 5. Refining the Mandate: Second Generation Issues; 5.1. THE PRINCIPLE OF PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY; 5.2. FROM A 'PRINCIPLE' OF STRUCTURAL SUPREMACY TO THE PRINCIPLE OF FULL EFFECTIVENESS.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 5.3. THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION5.4. THE REQUIREMENT OF UNIFORM APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW; 5.5. INTERMEDIATE CONCLUDING REMARKS; 5.6. CHANGING THE PERSPECTIVE: THE CREATION OF NEW REMEDIES; 6. The ''Simmenthal Mandate'' Embraced; 6.1. INTRODUCTION; 6.2. GRADUAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE DUTY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW BY THE DOMESTIC COURTS: A BIRD'S EYE VIEW; 6.3 FINAL REMARKS; 7. About Legal Orders; 7.1. INTRODUCTION; 7.2. THE CLASSIC DICHOTOMY: MONISM AND DUALISM; 7.3. WHAT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY LAW: IN SEARCH OF A DOCTRINAL BASIS.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 7.4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND NATIONAL LEGAL ORDER IN THE CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE7.6. DEFINING THE COMMUNITY LEGAL ORDER FROM THE NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; 7.7. CLOSING REMARKS; 8. The Constitutional Limits of the Judicial Function; 8.1. THE PLACE OF THE COURTS IN THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM; 8.2. THE COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE; 8.3. THE NATIONAL ANSWER; 9. Explaining Acceptance; 9.1. 'LEGALIST' EXPLANATIONS; 9.2. JUDICIAL DIALOGUE; 9.3. THE WIDER CONTEXT: NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON TREATIES.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 9.4. THE WIDER CONTEXT: THE GENERAL INCREASEOF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW9.5. THE EMPOWERMENT THESIS; 9.6. THE INTER-COURT COMPETITION ARGUMENT; 9.7. CROSS-FERTILISATION; 9.8. NATIONAL LEGAL CULTURES; 9.9. LA DOCTRINE AND PERSONALITIES ON THE BENCH ... ; 9.10. ... AND BEYOND; 9.11. THE CASES AT HAND; 9.12. THE PROPORTION OF COMMUNITY LAW CASES IN DOMESTIC PROCEEDINGS; 9.13. FINAL REMARKS; 10. Excursion: The ''Costanzo Mandate'' of Administrative Authorities; 11. The ''Francovish Mandate'': Jurisdiction to Hold the State Liable for Breach of Community Law; 11.1. INTRODUCTION.
|
500 |
|
|
|a 11.2. state liability for breach of community law before francovich.
|
520 |
|
|
|a The reform of the European Constitution continues to dominate news headlines and has provoked a massive debate, unprecedented in the history of EU law. Against this backdrop Monica Claes'' book offers a ""bottom up"" view of how the Constitution might work, taking the viewpoint of the national courts as her starting point, and at the same time returning to fundamental principles in order to interrogate the myths of Community law. Adopting a broad, comparative approach, she analyses the basic doctrines of Community law from both national constitutional perspectives as well as the more usual Eur.
|
590 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b Ebook Central Academic Complete
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Constitutional courts
|x European Union countries.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Constitutional law
|x European Union countries.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Courts
|x European Union countries.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Jurisdiction
|x European Union countries.
|
758 |
|
|
|i has work:
|a The national courts' mandate in the European constitution (Text)
|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFFqjwPcMV3JJvgtFpJjQ3
|4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Claes, Monica.
|t National Courts'' Mandate in the European Constitution.
|d London : Bloomsbury Publishing, ©2006
|z 9781841134765
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Modern studies in European law.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1772718
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL1772718
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|