A Theory of Precedent : From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law.

Analytical jurisprudence has been mostly silent on the role of precedent in legal adjudication. What is the content of a judge''s precedent ideology, or the rule of precedent-recognition, by means of which the ratio of a case is to be distinguished from mere dicta? In this study, the autho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Siltala, Raimo
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: London : Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.
Temas:
Law > Philosophy.
Stare decisis.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn893331536
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 141018s2000 enk o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCL 
020 |a 9781847311504 
020 |a 1847311504 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000056022557 
035 |a (OCoLC)893331536 
050 4 |a K574 .S57 2000 
082 0 4 |a 340.1 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Siltala, Raimo. 
245 1 2 |a A Theory of Precedent :  |b From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law. 
260 |a London :  |b Bloomsbury Publishing,  |c 2000. 
300 |a 1 online resource (304 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Half Title Page; Title Page; Title verso; Acknowledgments; Abbreviated Contents; Contents; Part A: How to Do Things with Precedents; 1. Frame of Analysis; 1. WRÓBLEWSKI ON THE THREE IDEOLOGIES OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING; 2. ROSS ON A JUDGE'S NORMATIVE IDEOLOGY; 3. HART ON THE RULE OF RECOGNITION; 4. OBJECT OF INQUIRY: PRECEDENTS AND PRECEDENT-FOLLOWING; 5. OBJECT OF INQUIRY REDEFINED: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL PREMISES OF THE RATIO OF A CASE, AS DERIVED FROM THE MULTI-LEVEL STRUCTURE OF LAW; 6. LEGAL SYSTEMIC FRAME: PRECEDENTS IN THE CIVIL LAW AND COMMON LAW CONTEXT. 
505 8 |a 7. THEORETICAL FRAME OF REFERENCE: FROM ANALYTICAL POSITIVISM TO A POST-ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY OF LAW8. AUXILIARY FRAME OF REFERENCE: DERRIDA, THE CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND DECONSTRUCTION; 9. QUESTIONS ON METHOD: FROM ANALYTICAL MODEL CONSTRUCTION TO A RADICAL QUESTIONING OF THE ULTIMATE PREMISES OF LAW (". . . UP AGAINST THE LIMITS OF LANGUAGE"); 10. OBJECTIONS AND REFUTATIONS; 2. The Concept of a Legal Norm: Legal Rules and Principles; 1. THE IDEA OF STRONG AND WEAK LEGAL IMPUTATION; 2. DWORKIN'S CHALLENGE TO LEGAL POSITIVISM; 3. SUMMERS ON THE CATEGORIES OF LEGAL FORMALITY. 
505 8 |a 4. LEGAL PRINCIPLES REDEFINED AS NORMS WITH LOW LEGAL FORMALITY5. RULES, PRINCIPLES, AND BACKGROUND REASONS OF LAW; 6. LEGAL RULES AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES/POLICIES IN THE CONTEXT OF PRECEDENTS; 3. A Theory of Precedent Ideology; 1. TERMINOLOGICAL DEFINITIONS; 2. THE MODELS OF PRECEDENT IDEOLOGY; 3. THE REALM OF PREDETERMINED MEANINGS: JUDICIAL REFERENCE; 4. A LAWGIVER, DRESSED IN ROBE: JUDICIAL LEGISLATION; 5. IN SEARCH OF THE PRIOR COURT'S ORIGINAL INTENTIONS: JUDICIAL EXEGESIS; 6. AN INTERPLAY OF SIMILARITY AND DISSIMILARITY IN PRECEDENT-FOLLOWING: REASONING BY ANALOGY AND DISTINGUISHING. 
505 8 |a 7. SYSTEMIC CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERLYING REASONS FROM A PRIOR COURT DECISION OR LINE OF DECISIONS8. REJUDGING A PRIOR COURT DECISION: JUDICIAL REVALUATION; 9. AXIOLOGICAL AND TELEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND REASONS OF LAW: JUDICIAL CONSEQUENTIALISM AND RIGHTNESS REASONS IN JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING; 4. Confrontations; 1. OPERATIVE PRECEDENT-NORM CONCEPTION; 2. DEONTIC MODE: DEGREE OF LEGAL FORMALITY INVOLVED; 3. SYSTEMIC STATICS OF PRECEDENT-FOLLOWING: DEGREE OF SYSTEMATICITY IN A SET OF PRECEDENTS; 4. SYSTEMIC DYNAMICS OF PRECEDENT-FOLLOWING; 5. METHOD OF ARGUMENTATION ADOPTED IN A PRECEDENT IDEOLOGY. 
505 8 |a 6. TECHNIQUES OF DEPARTURE FROM A PRECEDENT7. THEORETICAL RATIONALE OF A PRECEDENT IDEOLOGY; 5. Theory and Practice of Precedent-Following; 1. JUDICIAL EXEGESIS WITH FORMALLY DEFINED RATIO DECIDENDI (UNITED KINGDOM); 2. A FLEXIBLE SYSTEM OF SUBSTANTIVE RULES UNDER LEGAL PRAGMATISM (UNITED STATES/STATE OF NEW YORK); 3. DIVERGENCE OF OFFICIAL ACTION AND PROFESSIONAL SELF-UNDERSTANDING OF THE JUDICIARY (FRANCE); 4. A FLOOD OF DISCORDANT PRECEDENTS UNDER MUTUALLY INCONSISTENT THEORETICAL PREMISES (ITALY). 
500 |a 5. a free-floating system of outweighable and formally binding reasons (federal republic of germany). 
520 |a Analytical jurisprudence has been mostly silent on the role of precedent in legal adjudication. What is the content of a judge''s precedent ideology, or the rule of precedent-recognition, by means of which the ratio of a case is to be distinguished from mere dicta? In this study, the author identifies six types of judicial precedent-ideology, among them judicial legislation, systemic construction of the underlying reasons of law in the Dworkinian sense, and a radical re-evaluation of the merits of a prior case in later adjudication, as envisioned by the American Realists. These competing mode. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 4 |a Law  |x Philosophy. 
650 4 |a Stare decisis. 
758 |i has work:  |a A Theory of Precedent (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCG7GWQCXWQv46RmJ3mK9Tb  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Siltala, Raimo.  |t A Theory of Precedent : From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law.  |d London : Bloomsbury Publishing, ©2000  |z 9781841131238 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1750715  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL1750715 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP 

Ejemplares similares