Cargando…
Reading Nietzsche through the Ancients : an Analysis of Becoming, Perspectivism, and the Principle of Non-Contradiction.
Nietzsche's work was heavily influenced by ancient Greek philosophy. Meyer shows how Nietzsche attempted to revive the Heraclitean-Protagorean position that is critically analyzed by both Plato and Aristotle in the Theaetetus and Metaphysics IV, and establishes Nietzsche as a naturalist who bel...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Boston :
De Gruyter,
2014.
|
| Colección: | Monographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Preface and Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Contents; Introduction; Reading Nietzsche's Philosophy; Reading Nietzsche's Published and Unpublished Writings; Reading Nietzsche's Project through the Ancient Greeks; Chapter One. Becoming, Being, and the Problem of Opposites in Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Tragic Philosophy in The Birth of Tragedy; 1.3 A Turn to Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks; 1.4 Nietzsche's Doctrine of Heraclitean Becoming in the Secondary Literature; 1.4.1 Christoph Cox on Heraclitean Becoming.
- 1.4.2 John Richardson on Heraclitean Becoming1.5 Heraclitean Becoming in Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks; 1.6 The Response of Nietzsche's Parmenides to Nietzsche's Heraclitus; 1.7 A Rebirth of Antiquity?; Chapter Two. Aristotle's Defense of the Principle of Non-Contradiction in Metaphysics IV; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Nietzsche's Critique of Logic; 2.3 An Overview of Aristotle's Defense of the Principle of Non-Contradiction; 2.4 Three Formulations of the Principle of Non-Contradiction in Metaphysics IV; 2.5 Aristotle's Elenctic Defense.
- 2.6 The Devastating Consequences of Denying PNC-Ontological2.7 Empiricism, Naturalism, and the Denial of PNC-Ontological; 2.8 Aristotle's Critique of the Heraclitean-Cratylean Theory of Change; 2.9 Aristotle's Critique of Protagoras on Perception; 2.10 Some Concluding Remarks; Chapter Three. Naturalism, Becoming, and the Unity of Opposites in Human, All Too Human; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Maudemarie Clark on the Falsification Thesis; 3.3 Natural Science, Heraclitean Ontology, and the Falsification Thesis; 3.4 Natural Science and Heraclitean Ontology in The Pre-Platonic Philosophers.
- 3.5 A Turn to Human, All Too Human3.6 Natural Science and Heraclitean Ontology in Human, All Too Human 1-2; 3.7 Heraclitean Ontology and the Falsification Thesis in Human, All Too Human; 3.8 The Tragic Philosophy of Human, All Too Human; 3.9 Human, All Too Human and the Development of the Free Spirit; Chapter Four. Heraclitean Becoming and Protagorean Perspectivism in Plato's Theaetetus; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Justifying the Turn to Plato's Theaetetus; 4.3 Knowledge is Perception and the Four Theses; 4.4 Knowledge is Perception; 4.5 From Knowledge is Perception to Protagoras' Homo Mensura.
- 4.6 From Homo Mensura to the Secret Doctrines of Heraclitus4.7 A Preliminary Account of Perception and a Puzzle; 4.8 Heraclitean Ontology and a Secret Theory of Perception; 4.9 The Final Stage of the Secret Doctrine; 4.10 Some Preliminary Objections to Protagoras' Homo Mensura; 4.11 Protagoras' Homo Mensura and the Problem of Self-Refutation; 4.12 The Incompatibility of Heraclitean Ontology and Knowledge is Perception; 4.13 The Refutation of Knowledge is Perception; 4.14 Some Concluding Remarks.