The European Human Rights Culture - A Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe?
The European Human Rights Culture - A Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe? analyses the political term "European Human Rights Culture", a term first introduced by EU Commission President Barroso. Located in the fields of comparative law and European law, this book analyses, throug...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Otros Autores: | , |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Leiden :
BRILL,
2013.
|
Colección: | Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- The European Human Rights Culture
- A Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe?; Copyright; Table of Contents; Acknowledgements; Foreword; Introduction; Aim and Purpose; Significance; Methodology; Outline; 1 Background of the Paradox (Looking Inside the Paradox Box)
- History, Procedure, Symbols and the Family; 1.1. CJEU and ECtHR: Brief Historical, Procedural Comparison; 1.1.1. ECtHR in a Nutshell; 1.1.2. Procedure at CJEU in a Nutshell; 1.2. "We Are Family!"
- Meet the Family: Judges, Advocates General and Clerks; 1.2.1. Two European Families
- ECtHR and CJEU in Figures.
- 1.2.2. Family Portraits (Judges and Advocates General)1.2.3. A Judge's Diary
- Schedule of a Week; 1.2.4. Becoming Part of the Family; 1.2.4.1. Selection; 1.2.4.2. The Judges
- Integration into the Family; 1.2.4.3. The Advocates General; 1.2.4.4. Clerks; 1.3. "Thou Shall Not Dissent
- And No Way in English!"; 1.3.1. French Structure
- No Dissent; 1.3.2. French Language; 1.3.2.1. Working Tool; 1.3.2.2. Influence on Legal Thought; 1.4. Sources and Anchors: Meeting Don Quixote, the Cyclopes and Marilyn Monroe at the Court
- No Court is an Island.
- 1.5. "Twelve
- A Lucky Number?": The Symbols and Architecture of (European) Justice1.5.1. Symbols; 1.5.2. Architecture
- The Look of Justice; 1.5.2.1. Visiting Strasbourg
- ECtHR; 1.5.2.2. Visiting Luxembourg
- CJEU; 1.6. Conclusion: Both the Same and Different; 2 The Margin of Appreciation in Strasbourg and Luxembourg; 2.1. General Points on the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine; 2.2. The Development of the Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation in ECHR Law; 2.2.1. The Origins of the Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation; 2.2.2. Emergence through the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.
- 2.2.3. Limitations and the Methodology of the European Court of Human Rights2.2.4. Three Core Elements; 2.2.4.1. Prescribed by Law / In Accordance with Law; 2.2.4.2. Legitimate Aim; 2.2.4.3. Necessary in a Democratic Society; 2.2.5. Varying Views on an Elusive Doctrine; 2.2.6. Theoretical Vision or Theoretical Gap?; 2.3. The Development of the Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation in EU Law; 2.3.1. Margin of Appreciation in EU Law; 2.3.2. The Doctrine of Deference; 2.3.3. Article 4(2) TEU and the Legalisation of National Ideology; 2.3.4. The Rise of Article 4(2) TEU Case Law.
- 2.3.5 The Doctrine of Deference and the EUCFR2.4. Conclusion; 3 Europe's Rich Diversity
- 27 Different Countries on the Bench: How Differences Matter in the Decision Making; 3.1. Vocation; 3.2. Historical-Political Division of Former East/West Bloc; 3.3. Legal Families, Legal Traditions; 3.3.1. Nationality Blindness on the Bench; 3.3.2. Styles; 3.3.3. Comparative Approach; 3.3.4. Testing the Pulse; 3.4. Consensus, Forging Minds Together; 3.5. Conclusion and Vision; 4 Human Rights
- Who Owns Human Rights in Europe?; 4.1. Luxembourg's Human Rights Competence: Opening a Pandora's Box.