Cargando…
Constitutional Review in Europe : a Comparative Analysis.
This book offers a comprehensive, comparative analysis of how 11 representative European countries tackle the questions of who (should) uphold(s) the Constitution and how constitutional review is organised.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Oxford :
Hart Publishing Limited,
2013.
|
| Colección: | European and national constitutional law series.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; preliminary pages; Acknowledgements; Contents; Table of Cases; Table of European Treaties and European Legal Instruments; Table of Statutes; Introduction; Introductory Definitions: Constitutional Interpretation and Constitutional Review; Background: The Need for a Perspective Combining National and European Constitutional Law; Objectives; Method; Terminology; Structure; Chapter 1: The Role of Non-Judicial Actors inUpholding the Constitution; I. Introduction; II. Councils of State and Chancellors of Justice; III. Parliament and its Committees; IV. Heads of State; V. The People.
- VI. Concluding RemarksChapter 2: The Rise of Constitutional Adjudication; I. Introduction; II. The Notion of 'Constitutional Jurisdiction'; III. Exploring the Reasons Behind the Rise of Constitutional Adjudication; IV. Buckling the Trend? A Closer Look at the Approaches of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom; V. Concluding Remarks and Some Brief Reflections on the Two European Courts; Chapter 3: Purposes of Constitutional Adjudicationand Access to Constitutional Courts; I. Introduction; II. The Institutional Design of Constitutional Adjudication.
- III. Four Purposes that may be Served by Constitutional AdjudicationIV. Final Comparative Remarks and Reflections on the Court of Justice; Chapter 4: The Constitutional Bench; I. Introduction; II. Selection and Appointment Procedures; III. Number of Judges and Eligibility Criteria; IV. Tenure of Judicial Appointments and Termination Thereof; V. Final Comparative Remarks and Reflections on the Court of Justice; Chapter 5: Identifying the Sources of Standardsfor Constitutional Review; I. Introduction; II. Belgium: Cour Constitutionnelle; III. Czech Republic: Ústavní Soud.
- IV. Germany: BundesverfassungsgerichtV. France: Conseil Constitutionnel; VI. Hungary: Alkotmánybíróság; VII. Italy: Corte costituzionale; VIII. Trybunał Konstytucyjny; IX. Spain: Tribunal Constitucional; X. The Netherlands: Raad Van State; XI. United Kingdom: House of Lords Constitutional Committee; XII. Perustuslakivaliokunta; XIII. European Union: Court of Justice; XIV. Comparative Remarks; Chapter 6: Testing and Remedying Unconstitutionality; I. Introduction; II. Deference Rhetoric; III. Theory of the Living Law; IV. Constitution-Conform Interpretation.
- v. Types of Judgment and their EffectsVI. Concluding Remarks; Chapter 7: Interplay between ConstitutionalCourts and Other Actors; I. Introduction; II. Interactions between Constitutional Courts and (Constitutional) Legislatures; III. Interactions between Constitutional Courts and the Ordinary Courts; IV. Interactions among European Constitutional Courts; V. Interactions between Constitutional Courts and the Court of Justice; VI. Interactions between National Highest and Constitutional Courts and the European Court of Human Rights; VII. Concluding Remarks; Bibliography; Index.