Cargando…

Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German /

The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Langer, Nils, 1969-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Alemán
Publicado: Berlin ; New York : Walter de Gruyter, 2001.
Colección:Studia linguistica Germanica ; 60.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn868970058
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 010622s2001 gw ob 000 0 eng d
040 |a E7B  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c E7B  |d OCLCO  |d N$T  |d OCLCE  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCO  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCO  |d COCUF  |d AGLDB  |d MOR  |d PIFAG  |d ZCU  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d DEGRU  |d U3W  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d STF  |d VTS  |d ICG  |d OCLCQ  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d M8D  |d OCLCQ  |d HS0  |d UWK  |d ADU  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d AUD  |d OCLCQ  |d TUHNV  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 301008288  |a 604086247  |a 858282038  |a 922947509  |a 961591688  |a 962698365  |a 975207873  |a 975246128  |a 988499893  |a 991920339  |a 1013963453  |a 1037933163  |a 1042018757  |a 1043660593  |a 1058521326  |a 1065906816  |a 1081225663  |a 1084968157  |a 1097092324  |a 1109108552  |a 1110343088  |a 1112879080  |a 1119126218  |a 1119129934 
020 |a 9783110881103  |q (e-book) 
020 |a 3110881101  |q (e-book) 
020 |z 9783110170245 
020 |z 3110170248 
024 7 |a 10.1515/9783110881103  |2 doi 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000053309864 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043785436 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044053688 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 472809628 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 478285892 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 15626771 
035 |a (OCoLC)868970058  |z (OCoLC)301008288  |z (OCoLC)604086247  |z (OCoLC)858282038  |z (OCoLC)922947509  |z (OCoLC)961591688  |z (OCoLC)962698365  |z (OCoLC)975207873  |z (OCoLC)975246128  |z (OCoLC)988499893  |z (OCoLC)991920339  |z (OCoLC)1013963453  |z (OCoLC)1037933163  |z (OCoLC)1042018757  |z (OCoLC)1043660593  |z (OCoLC)1058521326  |z (OCoLC)1065906816  |z (OCoLC)1081225663  |z (OCoLC)1084968157  |z (OCoLC)1097092324  |z (OCoLC)1109108552  |z (OCoLC)1110343088  |z (OCoLC)1112879080  |z (OCoLC)1119126218  |z (OCoLC)1119129934 
037 |n Title subscribed to via ProQuest Academic Complete 
041 0 |a eng  |a ger 
042 |a dlr 
050 4 |a PF4521  |b .L36 2001eb 
072 7 |a PF  |2 lcco 
072 7 |a FOR  |x 028000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 437/.02  |2 21 
084 |a 18.08  |2 bcl 
084 |a GB 6521  |2 rvk 
084 |a GB 4055  |2 rvk 
084 |a GC 4983  |2 rvk 
084 |a GC 4672  |2 rvk 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Langer, Nils,  |d 1969-  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJm9dPVXqhxpvx8YdhkkXd 
245 1 0 |a Linguistic purism in action :  |b how auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German /  |c Nils Langer. 
264 1 |a Berlin ;  |a New York :  |b Walter de Gruyter,  |c 2001. 
300 |a 1 online resource (324 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Studia linguistica Germanica ;  |v 60 
500 |a Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2000. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 276-312). 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
506 |3 Use copy  |f Restrictions unspecified  |2 star  |5 MiAaHDL 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b [Place of publication not identified] :  |c HathiTrust Digital Library,  |d 2010.  |5 MiAaHDL 
538 |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.  |u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212  |5 MiAaHDL 
583 1 |a digitized  |c 2010  |h HathiTrust Digital Library  |l committed to preserve  |2 pda  |5 MiAaHDL 
505 0 |a Table of Content -- Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 The Problem -- 1.2 Grammarians -- 1.3 Tun in Standard German -- 1.4 Thesis -- 1.5 Method -- 2. Part I: The Distribution of Auxiliary Tun -- 2.0 Auxiliary Tun in Other Languages -- 2.1 The Origin of Tun -- 2.2 Tun in Frisian -- 2.3 Tun in Dutch -- 2.4 Tun in English -- 2.5 Tun in Low German -- 2.6 Tun in Older Stages of German -- 2.7 Tun in Early New High German -- 2.8 Tun in Modern German Dialects -- 2.9 Tun in ENHG -- a New Analysis -- 2.10 Conclusion of Part I 
505 8 |a 3. Part II: The Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun3.1 The Emergence of Standard German â€? Early Approaches and Current Thinking -- 3.2 The Emergence of Standard German and the Influence of Grammarians -- 3.3 Polynegation and Double Perfect -- 3.4 Syntactic Stigmatization by Prescriptive Grammarians -- 3.5 The Stigmatization of Polynegation and Double Perfect -- 3.6 Prescriptive Grammarians and the Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun -- 3.7 Conclusion of Part II -- 4. Conclusion -- 5. Appendix: Data and Bibliographies -- 5.1 Primary Data -- 5.2 Bibliographies 
520 |a The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect 
546 |a In English. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a German language  |y Early modern, 1500-1700  |x Auxiliary verbs. 
650 0 |a Tun (The German word) 
650 0 |a German language  |x Standardization  |x History. 
650 6 |a Allemand (Langue)  |y 1500-1700  |x Auxiliaires. 
650 6 |a Allemand (Langue)  |x Normalisation  |x Histoire. 
650 7 |a FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY  |x Yiddish.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a German language  |x Standardization  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Tun (The German word)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Frühneuhochdeutsch  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Verb  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Technik und Naturwissenschaft  |g Unterrichtsfach  |2 gnd 
650 1 7 |a Hulpwerkwoorden.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Duits.  |2 gtt 
650 0 7 |a tun.  |2 swd 
651 7 |a Frühneuhochdeutsch.  |2 swd 
648 7 |a 1500-1700  |2 fast 
655 7 |a History  |2 fast 
758 |i has work:  |a Linguistic purism in action (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGvFKyYmJvQJPxRJQhMgKd  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Langer, Nils,1969-  |t Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German.  |d Berlin ; New York : Walter de Gruyter, 2001  |k Studia linguistica Germanica ; 60  |z 9783110170245  |w (DLC) 2001042249  |w (OCoLC)47254249 
830 0 |a Studia linguistica Germanica ;  |v 60. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3044354  |z Texto completo 
936 |a BATCHLOAD 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9783110881103 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL3044354 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10782316 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 629315 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 10820078 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP