Cargando…
Output-Driven Phonology : Theory and Learning.
This book presents the theory of output-driven maps and provides fresh perspectives in an accessible way for students and researchers.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2013.
|
| Colección: | Cambridge studies in linguistics.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Coverpage; Half-title page; Series page; Title page; Copyright page; Epigraph; Contents; Figures; Acknowledgments; 1 Characterizing surface orientedness in phonology; 1.1 Surface orientedness; 1.1.1 Surface orientedness in phonology; 1.1.2 Formalizing surface orientedness; 1.2 Surface orientedness in Optimality Theory; 1.2.1 Markedness violations as opacity; 1.2.2 Markedness constraints cause disparities; 1.2.3 Something more general; 1.3 Formalizing surface orientedness: output-driven maps; 1.4 Output drivenness and Optimality Theory; 1.5 Output drivenness and learning.
- 1.6 The relationship between learnability and linguistic theory2 Output-driven maps; 2.1 The main idea; 2.1.1 Terminology: candidates and correspondence; 2.1.2 Inputs of greater similarity yield the same output; 2.1.3 Unifying surface orientedness; 2.2 Relative similarity; 2.2.1 Relating the disparities of two candidates; 2.2.2 Individuating disparities; 2.2.3 Relative similarity is a relational notion; 2.2.4 The importance of input-output correspondence; 2.3 Output drivenness is not process opacity; 2.3.1 One map, multiple generalizations; 2.3.2 Epenthesis and assimilation in Lithuanian.
- 2.3.3 Closeness with processes2.4 Formal analysis with segmental IO correspondence; 2.4.1 Maps from inputs to candidates; 2.4.2 The internal structure of candidates; 2.4.3 Relating candidates to each other; 2.4.4 The non-uniqueness of input-input correspondence; 2.4.5 Removing disparities by changing the input; 2.4.6 The identical disparity requirement and surface orientedness; 2.4.7 Individuating disparities (again); 2.5 Expanding to other representational theories; 2.5.1 Non-identical corresponding representational elements; 2.5.2 Non-unique correspondence.
- 2.5.3 Autosegmental representation2.6 The map; 3 Output-driven maps in Optimality Theory; 3.1 Background: ERC entailment in Optimality Theory; 3.1.1 Elementary ranking conditions; 3.1.2 Single ERC entailment: L-retraction and W-extension; 3.1.3 Joint ERC entailment: fusion; 3.2 Relating output-driven maps to Optimality Theory; 3.2.1 Output-driven maps and optimization; 3.2.2 A designated competitor: aoy; 3.2.3 Relationships among the disparities; 3.2.4 As goes bpy, so goes aoy; 3.2.5 Output-driven maps and constraints; 3.3 Sufficient conditions for output-driven maps.
- 3.3.1 Properties of Gen: correspondence uniformity3.3.2 Properties of constraints: output-driven preserving; 3.3.3 Proof of sufficient conditions for output-driven maps; Proof; 3.4 Basic constraints: overview of the results; 3.4.1 Terminology: faithfulness and input-referring constraints; 3.4.2 Markedness constraints; 3.4.3 Value-independent input-referring constraints; 3.4.4 Value-restricted input-referring constraints; 3.5 Analysis of relationships between disparities; 3.5.1 The set-up; 3.5.2 Deletion disparities; Input segments with no input-input correspondents.