Cargando…
Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice.
This collection of essays explores the legal and moral questions that arise at the end of war and in the transition to less oppressive regimes.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2013.
|
| Colección: | ASIL studies in international legal theory.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice; Series; Title; Copyright; Contents; Contributors; Introduction; I.1. Jus Post Bellum Principles; I.2. Transitional Justice; I.3. Comparing Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice; I.4. Summary and Framing of the Chapters; 1 Just Military Occupation? A Case Study of the American Occupation of Japan; 1.1. Introduction; 1.2. Scope and Methodology; 1.3. Military Occupation of Japan: A Brief Outline; 1.4. American Policy toward Occupied Japan: The Theory and the Practice; 1.5. The American Occupation and Jus Post Bellum.
- 1.6. Retribution: The Case of the Emperor1.7. Conclusion; 2 Was damals Recht war ... ; 2.1.; 2.2.; 2.3.; 2.4.; 2.5.; 3 Community-Based Accountability in Afghanistan: Recommendations to Balance the Interests of Justice; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Complementarity as a Measure of Justice; 3.2.1. The Nature of Complementarity; 3.2.2. Complementarity and Community-Based Justice; 3.3. Article 53 and the "Interests of Justice"; 3.3.1. The Conceptual Roots of Integrating Community-Based Efforts into the Court; 3.3.2. The Prosecutor's Current Policy on the "Interests of Justice."
- 3.4. Community-Based Justice in Afghanistan3.4.1. Traditional Gap-Fillers; 3.4.2. State Justice in Afghanistan; 3.4.3. The Interconnectedness of Justice in Afghanistan; 3.5. Proposals for an Integrated Justice System; 3.5.1. The Existing Statutory Structure; 3.5.2. How to Achieve Legal Interrelatedness; 3.5.3. Deficiencies in the Draft Law on Dispute Resolution Shuras and Jirgas; 3.6. A Model Statute for Truly Interrelated Regimes in Afghanistan; 3.7. Conclusion; 4 (Re)Defining Crimes against Humanity for a Jus Post Bellum World; 4.1. Introduction.
- 4.2. Origins of the State or Organizational Policy Requirement4.3. The Uncertain Customary International Law Status of the State or Organizational Policy Requirement; 4.4. The State or Organizational Policy Requirement in the International Criminal Court Case Law; 4.4.1. The Meaning of "State" and "State Policy"; 4.4.2. The Meaning of "Organization" and "Organizational Policy"; 4.5. Conclusion; 5 Jus Post Bellum and Amnesties; 6 Earthquakes and Wars: The Logic of International Reparations; 6.1. Introduction; 6.2. The State of the Law; 6.2.1. War Crimes; 6.2.2. Incidental Wartime Damage.
- 6.2.3. Natural Disasters6.2.4. The Special Case of the Responsibility to Protect; 6.2.5. Proposals to Expand the Duty of Reparations for War and the Duty to Aid in Natural Disasters; 6.3. Harms from War, Harms from Natural Disasters; 6.3.1. Human Agency; 6.3.2. Type and Magnitude of Harm; 6.3.3. Distribution of Losses; 6.3.4. Cost Effectiveness; 6.3.5. Other Considerations; 6.4. The Possible Case for Extending Reparations; 6.4.1. Corrective Justice; 6.4.1.1. The Problem of "Wrongfulness"; 6.4.1.2. Responsibility; 6.4.2. Distributive Justice; 6.4.3. Samaritanism; 6.4.4. Transitional Justice.