Cargando…

Argumentation in Political Interviews : Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency.

In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Andone, Corina
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013.
Colección:Argumentation in context ; v. 5.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn853238829
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 130719s2013 xx ob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  2013013546 
040 |a IDEBK  |b eng  |e pn  |c IDEBK  |d EBLCP  |d MHW  |d E7B  |d CDX  |d CN3GA  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d CSJ  |d OCLCQ  |d LOA  |d N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d AGLDB  |d OCLCQ  |d ICA  |d OCLCQ  |d MOR  |d CCO  |d PIFAG  |d ZCU  |d XFH  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d COO  |d OCLCQ  |d U3W  |d D6H  |d STF  |d WRM  |d VTS  |d ICG  |d INT  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d OCLCQ  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d HS0  |d UKCRE  |d AJS  |d S2H  |d DST  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 857711590  |a 960201367  |a 961564642  |a 962646181  |a 988494802  |a 991921109  |a 994396436  |a 1037797351  |a 1038613412  |a 1077230104  |a 1109233322  |a 1153531287  |a 1162038681  |a 1241890362  |a 1259108216  |a 1288250171  |a 1290070786  |a 1300524815  |a 1303317363  |a 1303429714  |a 1329085117 
020 |a 1299736076  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781299736078  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9027271755  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9789027271754  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9789027211224  |q (hb ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 9027211221  |q (hb ;  |q alk. paper) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000055902972 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044176886 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 397588895 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 484714236 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000066758138 
035 |a (OCoLC)853238829  |z (OCoLC)857711590  |z (OCoLC)960201367  |z (OCoLC)961564642  |z (OCoLC)962646181  |z (OCoLC)988494802  |z (OCoLC)991921109  |z (OCoLC)994396436  |z (OCoLC)1037797351  |z (OCoLC)1038613412  |z (OCoLC)1077230104  |z (OCoLC)1109233322  |z (OCoLC)1153531287  |z (OCoLC)1162038681  |z (OCoLC)1241890362  |z (OCoLC)1259108216  |z (OCoLC)1288250171  |z (OCoLC)1290070786  |z (OCoLC)1300524815  |z (OCoLC)1303317363  |z (OCoLC)1303429714  |z (OCoLC)1329085117 
037 |a 504858  |b MIL 
050 4 |a P95.8 
072 7 |a POL  |x 032000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 030000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 320.01  |a 320.01/4 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Andone, Corina. 
245 1 0 |a Argumentation in Political Interviews :  |b Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. 
260 |b John Benjamins Publishing Company,  |c 2013. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Argumentation in context,  |x 1877-6884 ;  |v v. 5 
520 |a In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians' responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of win. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Argumentation in Political Interviews; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation; 1.3 Objectives and method of the study; 1.4 Organization of the study; 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency; 2.1 Introduction; 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency; 2.4 Conclusion. 
505 8 |a 3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews; 3.2 The initial situation; 3.3 Starting points; 3.4 Argumentative means; 3.5 The possible outcome; 3.6 Conclusion; 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview; 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency; 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion; Pattern 1: 'it depends'; Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear' 
505 8 |a Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference'4.4 Conclusion; 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview; 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering; 5.2 Soundness conditions; 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness; 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance; 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity; 5.3 Conclusion; 6. Conclusion; 6.1 Main findings; 6.2 Implications for further research; References; List of figures; Name index; Subject index. 
546 |a English. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Communication  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Persuasion (Rhetoric)  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Rhetoric  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Interviewing. 
650 0 |a Inconsistency (Logic) 
650 0 |a Conversation analysis. 
650 0 |a Reasoning. 
650 6 |a Communication  |x Aspect politique. 
650 6 |a Discours politique. 
650 6 |a Entretiens. 
650 6 |a Inconsistance (Logique) 
650 6 |a Analyse de la conversation. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x National.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Communication  |x Political aspects  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Conversation analysis  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Inconsistency (Logic)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Interviewing  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Persuasion (Rhetoric)  |x Political aspects  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Reasoning  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Rhetoric  |x Political aspects  |2 fast 
758 |i has work:  |a Argumentation in political interviews (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCH6vtYmcqwVYH8rKRqmfdP  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9781299736078 
830 0 |a Argumentation in context ;  |v v. 5.  |x 1877-6884 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1316678  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH28555848 
938 |a Coutts Information Services  |b COUT  |n 25840770 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL1316678 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10734240 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1422805 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis25840770 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 10870999 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP