Cargando…
Contemporary Debates in Epistemology.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley,
2013.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro
- Contemporary Debates in Epistemology
- Copyright
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Should Knowledge Come First?
- Knowledge First
- Note
- What Is Knowledge-first Epistemology?
- (Un)analyzability
- Justification and Excuses
- The Good and Bad Cases
- Regarding Indiscriminability
- Regarding Formal Methods
- Notes
- References
- Experience First
- Conclusion
- Notes
- References
- Knowledge Still First
- Still Nowhere Else to Start
- Acknowledgments
- References
- 2 Is Knowledge Closed under Known Entailment?
- The Case against Closure
- 1 Transmissibility
- 2 Closure
- 3 Heavyweight Implications
- Notes
- References
- The Case for Closure
- Introduction
- 1 Versions of Epistemic Closure
- 2 In Favor of Closure Principle (4)
- Argument (A): closure and distribution
- Argument (B): knowledge and assertion
- 3 Heavyweight Propositions and Conclusive Reasons
- Category 1: manifestly heavyweight with conclusive reasons
- Category 2: not manifestly heavyweight but lacking conclusive reasons
- 4 Residual Puzzles
- Notes
- References
- Reply to Hawthorne
- 3 Is Knowledge Contextual?
- Contextualism Contested
- Epistemic Contexualism
- Loose Talk
- Strict Truth
- A Delicate Balance
- Notes
- References
- Contextualism Defended
- 1 Contextualism and Skeptical Paradoxes
- 2 Alternative Accounts
- 3 Is the Contextualist Model Coherent?
- Note
- References
- Contextualism Contested Some More
- Brief Replies
- Notes
- Contextualism Defended Some More
- 1 When Should We Appeal to Contextualist Resolutions of Philosophical Paradoxes?
- 2 Explaining the Skeptical Paradox: Contextualism versus Invariantism
- 3 Objections to Contextualism
- Notes
- References
- 4 Do Practical Matters Affect Whether You Know?
- Practical Matters Affect Whether You Know
- Notes
- References
- Practical Matters Do Not Affect Whether You Know
- 1 The Case for Pragmatic Encroachment
- 1a Practical talk about knowledge
- 1b Knowledge as a safe reason
- 1c High stakes and low stakes
- 2 Objections to Pragmatic Encroachment
- 2a The variety of ways we criticize, justify, and excuse
- 2b Crazy counterfactuals
- 2c Knowledge and high stakes
- 2d The relativity of knowledge
- 2e Safe reasons and the risk of error
- 2f The Dutch book
- 2g Putting the cart before the horse
- 3 An Alternative Proposal
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
- References
- 5 Can Skepticism Be Refuted?
- The Refutation of Skepticism
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
- References
- The Challenge of Refuting Skepticism
- Defining the Skeptical Challenge
- Underdetermination
- Choosing from among Competitors
- The Analysis of Epistemic Probability
- Another Sort of Domestic Skepticism
- Reasoning to the Best Explanation
- Notes
- References